Forum
Comments:
-
- on Sat 14 Feb 2009
- 09:29:59 AM UTC
Re: A list of many fraud website in a court order
You can use the mass rating tool to rate 100 sites at the time. It's a good idea to link to the source in the comment.
-
- on Sun 15 Feb 2009
- 02:31:48 AM UTC
Thank you
Dear Sami,
Thank you, that worked very well. I made sure to mention the judge, the date of the decision and provide a link to the court order. I see that there is a use for the metal-level membership status after all. This should make it easier to cover more of the internet in less time.
Yours
PHung
-
- on Sun 15 Feb 2009
- 06:30:22 AM UTC
hold on
why do you feel those websites are "dangerous"?
I went to your link, and you must realize that SNR - Student Network Resources WON the court case. Everyone of the 544 listed domains, example: actionpapers.net was transferred from Axact to SNR by court order during the final judgment. (entire court docket here) The court ordered Google to remove those names from it's search index not because something was dangerous about them but because they were physically named in a trial awaiting judgment. You know innocent until proven guilty - they are not guilty of anything.
Mass ratings sites you "hear" about from another page doesn't mean your ratings are correct or fair. You've just red flagged a bunch of sites. Did you invesitgate any of these? click on http://www.actionpapers.net/ it redirects to essaytown.com (WOT) another site you flagged for being in a "court order" as a scam.
The court order is complete and those domains have been released now. and back in Google's index
-
- on Mon 16 Feb 2009
- 01:09:35 PM UTC
Reading the court order legalese...
Dear g7w,
Of course I checked up on several of these sites, they are plagiarism 'services' and a moral hazard to young impressionable school children. I do not want children to waste their education by paying someone to do their schoolwork for them. I understand that my more conservative view on cheating may not be universal.
However I did make a mistake when reading the court order legalese. When the judgment talked about fraud, I thought that this referred to the website contents. I will have to go back and reflag the sites more accurately.
Thank you for pointing out my error. I will have to be very careful with the the mass rating tool.
Yours
Phung -
- on Mon 16 Feb 2009
- 04:02:02 PM UTC
with great power
with great power, comes great responsibility.
I will have to be very careful with the the mass rating tool
I suppose that being careful is all one should expect.peace,
G7W

A list of many fraud website in a court order.
Dear WOT,
In a US Court Order (D. New Jersey), I found a list of many essay fraud websites. It would be useful to put them into WOT. However I am not sure about the methods or procedures for such a bulk submission. The order is posted on http://www.chillingeffects.org/notice.cgi?sID=9146
How can we make use of this?
Yours
PHung