Forum
Comments:
-
- on Sat 15 Aug 2009
- 03:30:05 PM UTC
Probably it is not hacked,
Probably it is not hacked, probably I've got the definition of "hack" wrong, but I think that the person who had caused cbox.ws to be automatically redirected to 67.cbox.ws should not be doing so? It seems to me like a prank.
-
- on Sat 15 Aug 2009
- 03:36:53 PM UTC
Re: Probably it is not hacked
Sounds like a glitch in Cbox. The 67.cbox.ws subdomain loads the same site as cbox.ws, so it's most likely not controlled by one of their customers. When I visited the site, it didn't redirect me to a subdomain.
-
- on Sat 15 Aug 2009
- 03:40:17 PM UTC
probably because it doesn't
probably because it doesn't redirect you to a subdomain explains why I think the system managed by Cbox has been hacked by the creater of the 67.cbox.ws tagboard. http://adserving.cpxinteractive.com/st?ad_type=iframe&ad_size=46... might be the cause of the problem, but I'm just guessing.
-
- on Sat 15 Aug 2009
- 03:52:36 PM UTC
Re: probably because it doesn't
Have you asked about this from Cbox support?
-
- on Sat 15 Aug 2009
- 04:04:49 PM UTC
Yes I have, but apparently
Yes I have, but apparently they haven't given me a reply yet.
-
- on Sat 15 Aug 2009
- 05:58:02 PM UTC
Was at the "hackscene" for the entire show
A lot of people spamming and advertising using the chat box...LOL
☆¢σρчяιgђτ ©2009 ©®eαšтeяч™☆
Visit http://wintechpedia.co.cc for tech tips.
Note: http://wintechpedia.blogspot.com is our previous website. -
- on Sat 15 Aug 2009
- 07:08:39 PM UTC
I see, thanks for
I see, thanks for commenting. So Creastery, is this a piece of news that we ought to be concerned about? There are millions of people using Cbox everywhere and a short breakdown may cause chaos.
-
- on Sun 16 Aug 2009
- 06:32:47 AM UTC
Hmm..
Okay. Maybe we ought to be a bit concern, though generally its not a big impact.
If Cbox was to be hacked again, we can't really blame the developers of Cbox for their loopholes in their security.
Even if all data were gone, they will just rehost Cbox.
Nothing much we can do too..☆¢σρчяιgђτ ©2009 ©®eαšтeяч™☆
Visit http://wintechpedia.co.cc for tech tips.
Note: http://wintechpedia.blogspot.com is our previous website. -
- on Sat 15 Aug 2009
- 08:25:09 PM UTC
cpxinteractive r more
cpxinteractive r more dangerous than yieldmanger/doubleclick/adbrite coz their ads seem to appear more than all 3 of them...
-
- on Sun 16 Aug 2009
- 06:09:00 AM UTC
Image from the hack scene
(Right Click, View Image to Enlarge)
You'll Never Walk Alone -
- on Sun 16 Aug 2009
- 06:27:01 AM UTC
LOL!
I saw that..but i forgot to take a picture of the "hackscene".
☆¢σρчяιgђτ ©2009 ©®eαšтeяч™☆
Visit http://wintechpedia.co.cc for tech tips.
Note: http://wintechpedia.blogspot.com is our previous website. -
- on Tue 18 Aug 2009
- 12:39:23 AM UTC
RE: Tracking and tagging
Hello, my name is samuel Albury.
I 'am new to WOT, I have only return to the country in 06. My return was a shock, not all the guys wearing white hats are the good guys any longer. In fact I find most people in country are just plain problems.I don't know anyone here, my comments are pertaining to companies of all types.
I have met many scam artist on line. Generally I talk with them until I get some worthy information to confim their lie. File a report with local companies or Int'l companies, and authories.
Most will run away and you don't hear from them under that name or country. But, their
network , information exchange is poor, but they do work together.
They still make many mistakes in which they get caught.
As, a group of savy Internet watch personnel there is plenty you can do. The S.Service will not get involved unless its 100k or larger, Bureau Formal complaint and threat to domestic way of life (slow)
I will ontinue to do what I do and will mark site as I see them.
The othere day I came across a site, a mortgage company that was "Green" I hear this company is a very Bad boy, the Wall St Type. They are under investigation, so how did they get a GREEN TAG? Help -
- on Tue 18 Aug 2009
- 12:38:23 AM UTC
Hello, welcome to WOT Community Forum
The othere day I came across a site, a mortgage company that was "Green" I hear this company is a very Bad boy, the Wall St Type. They are under investigation, so how did they get a GREEN TAG? Help
what is the domain name?
(simple, non-live doamin reference please; i.e., example.com)
-------
Against Intuition - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
Thank you all
- G7W -
- on Wed 19 Aug 2009
- 04:03:26 AM UTC
"Bad boy" is relative
"The othere day I came across a site, a mortgage company that was "Green" I hear this company is a very Bad boy, the Wall St Type. They are under investigation, so how did they get a GREEN TAG?"
With the current economic meltdown, there are a lot of "bad boys" out there . . . Citigroup, AIG, and GM, just to name a few. However, that doesn't necessarily mean that their sites should be red.
OTOH, if it's clearly a scam (and doesn't require a congressional investigation to determine that), than it should be rated red.
We need, as g7w said, the domain name to look at it.
-
- on Tue 18 Aug 2009
- 12:45:55 AM UTC
RE: Tracking and tagging
Must walk softly D L B Mo co Add 1 letter for truth
-
- on Tue 18 Aug 2009
- 03:11:41 AM UTC
dlbmo.com
The truth is, one must be serious to be taken seriously...
-------
Against Intuition - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
Thank you all
- G7W
Cbox has been hacked
I was trying to create a new tagboard when I realised that Cbox had been replaced by one of its customers, 67.cbox.ws. Is this a piece of news that is worth worrying about?