Forum
Comments:
-
- on Tue 15 Sep 2009
- 10:42:08 PM UTC
PHISH
Long before user: difrawi_defrawy was created and started informing the WOT Community about three stars, etc we had already recognized many websites for what they truely are; PHISHing sites.
Before this post was created medialogic sites were rated RED.
example:
MEDIALOGIC-AK.COM - Scorecard
changes to this in the address bar
medialogicak.com - Scorecard
View the two scorecards presented, then run through the other topic post and experiment with the other listed domains by removing the hyphen and verify if a site exists and has been rated.The thing about scam sites is for some reason they feel they need hundreds of domains to cross-link to (link farm) and Spam from.
MediaLogic would have more merit if there was 1 domain: medialogic.com but it has hundreds and they all look the same, just like the average Canadian Pharmacy scam.
Media Logic Inc. will be expanding its horizons beyond the status quo of today with an eye towards the next evolution of the internet -- Web 3.0 perhaps.
Not if they're still stuck in 1999 with the old link farm ideology, which BTW penalizes them in Google, but Google isn't the only search engine...- As for Web 3.0... let me quote:
- People keep asking what Web 3.0 is. I think maybe when
you've got an overlay of scalable vector graphics - everything
rippling and folding and looking misty - on Web 2.0 and access to a
semantic
Web integrated across a huge space of data, you'll have access
to an unbelievable data resource."
— Tim Berners-Lee, 2006
(click the link, listen to Tim).
medialogic is so not there...
-------
Against Intuition - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
Thank you all
- G7W -
- on Tue 15 Sep 2009
- 11:09:19 PM UTC
So are we to understand that
So are we to understand that the Three Stars name is now abandoned and they will be working under the Media Logic name instead?
It seems that threestarsinc.com, their main website, is dead, and the content on medialogicinc.com is pretty much identical except that "Three Stars" has been substituted for "Media Logic".
-
- on Wed 16 Sep 2009
- 12:04:07 AM UTC
Advertising copy?
Are you an advertising person, Debbie D.? In another thread you said "I wouldn't be very good at my job if I didn't"
I mean, was the advertising lingo in your original post here ad copy that you came up with, or something that was lifted from a Media Logic advertising pamphlet?
Just curious . . . certainly not asking you to reveal your identity. Though if you're not an advertising person for Three Stars/MonkeyJar/Media Logic, you sure are doing a good imitation of one.
-
- on Tue 22 Sep 2009
- 03:50:21 PM UTC
I'm an independent
I'm an independent contractor if you must know. But not in advertising.
-
- on Tue 22 Sep 2009
- 05:21:57 PM UTC
Stop feeding this trolling company shill, please
and see http://www.mywot.com/en/forum/4332-media-logic-inc... for relevant news about phishing scam site medialogicinc.com
=============================
WOT this is all about backgrounds
http://threestarswatch.blogspot.com/
http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/internetsolutions... -
- on Wed 23 Sep 2009
- 05:32:11 PM UTC
I don't understand this. Are
I don't understand this. Are you saying you don't want to have an open dialogue? That you'd rather just have a one sided conversation?
-
- on Wed 23 Sep 2009
- 07:36:08 PM UTC
Why is it pointless?
First, I'm not saying the company's business model is irrefutable and it's not open to change. However, it does seem like what you're saying here is that they should be doing all the change and you shouldn't have to do any of your own. That doesn't seem fair. Isn't it possible that you're wrong? Or at the very least they're not as bad as you seem to think they are? Aren't you willing to meet them halfway?
-
- on Wed 23 Sep 2009
- 10:09:53 PM UTC
~ Isn't it possible that you're wrong? ~
Yes. And when we are we admit it. But I don't think we are this time.
~Aren't you willing to meet them halfway?~
Me? No.
I'm done replying. Good day...
-
- on Wed 23 Sep 2009
- 10:17:13 PM UTC
It is pointless because we
It is pointless because we have facts to back up our impressions of Three Stars as "bad", a phishing operation and generally untrustworthy. Trying to spread doubt about those facts is something you've already failed to do, despite taking it to extreme lengths.
If Three Stars were to, for example, shut down the defamation campaign, and get off those blacklists, then we're getting somewhere. Until then, I agree any discussion is pointless.
-
- on Tue 22 Sep 2009
- 05:47:35 PM UTC
This is getting old...
Actually it got old a long time ago...
Stop feeding this trolling company shill, please
Agreed.
-
- on Wed 23 Sep 2009
- 03:42:30 AM UTC
But it's so much fun...
But it's so much fun... And who knows, she might actually have a reasonable argument buried under all that propaganda somewhere, and I'd like to dig it out.
-
- on Tue 22 Sep 2009
- 11:47:09 PM UTC
shill - new word for the day
I had to look that one up; it's closely related to a lobbyist isn't it? :-D
-------
Against Intuition - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
Thank you all
- G7W -
- on Wed 23 Sep 2009
- 10:12:21 PM UTC
There is no Web 3.0
This more than any other marketroid buzzword of 2009 really grates on my nerves.
Say it with me now...
THERE IS NO WEB THREE POINT OH
There, that feels better now, doesn't it.
-
- on Sat 26 Sep 2009
- 02:01:16 AM UTC
Wow
Kind of a weird thread, but interesting in away.
Didn't seem like she was an employee, but her first post wasn't dialog, it was some cut and paste.
WOT provides a valuable service, but we all have to be aware that sometime we can be wrong. In case of Medialogic - there is enough history and facts to support that it is badware at the least.
Still, there should be a process where a company can go about changing their rating. Is there such a process? Sorry for the n00b question.
-
- on Sat 26 Sep 2009
- 07:51:22 AM UTC
Maybe
Not sure if you could call it a "process", such as McAfee has (though I'm not so sure their email routine for owners is very good . . . most requests to rerate there get bogged down in the "administrative" pipeline), but here at WOT an owner who thinks s/he has been rated unfairly can post here. And many do.
And since WOT is NOT automated like McAfee, but rather derives the ratings from users, this is really the right place to question a rating. Responses are much more immediate.
-
- on Sat 26 Sep 2009
- 08:59:58 PM UTC
process
Think of WOT as a voting booth.
You vote for Mr. Smith
I vote for Mr. JonesMr. Smith "wins"
Should we try to convert Mr. Smith's votes over to Mr. Jones?
Visa versa?So the "process" of getting WOT members to change their ratings (votes) would require 1 on 1 interaction with them, via their profile board and then do so in a nonintrusive way to convince them they are "wrong" and you are "right."
The other alternative is to bring the discussion to this Forum and hope that all those who rated the site in question also participate on this forum.
Another thing, not everyone leaves comments, so it is unwise to assume that the only ones who rated are those who also commented, meaning, you really don't know who all rated a website, or how they rated it.
-------
WOT Services Ltd. - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
Thank you all
- G7W -
- on Sat 26 Sep 2009
- 10:00:37 PM UTC
n00bs questions are no
n00bs questions are no problem, but adding more misinformation is. First, Debbie D is most likely paid for her trolling activities, and second, Medialogic is not 'badware' (like f.i Cyberdefender), but part of a phishing-like data mining operation.
Could someone close this thread now?
=============================
WOT this is all about backgrounds
http://threestarswatch.blogspot.com/
http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/internetsolutions...
What Media Logic Inc. is
Since there will undoubtedly be lots of interest regarding Media Logic Inc, it's important for transparency sake to come forth with the basic information now.
Media Logic Inc. will be a web technology company that will explore new avenues for commerce on the internet. Some of the strategy will be marketing based, some will in the realm of social networking sites, and some will be focused on discovering the next big thing on the internet.
Media Logic Inc. will be expanding its horizons beyond the status quo of today with an eye towards the next evolution of the internet -- Web 3.0 perhaps.
Discussion about the company is welcome.