(The quickest way to register)

Forum

Dear visitor! The webpage is only available in English. We're sorry for the inconvenience.
  1. User picture
    • sebsauvage on Mon 21 Sep 2009
    • 09:18:50 AM UTC

    McAfee TrustedSource... not to trusted.

    I like WOT. Because people rate sites, not only stupid computers.

    I see some people boo-hing WOT and praising McAfee TrustedSource/SiteAdvisor.
    Truth is... I see more and more good sites with bad ratings on TrustedSource.

    http://www.trustedsource.org/query/malekal.com
    which is the french personal website of a guy who does a *lot* of good work regarding Windows security.

    or http://www.trustedsource.org/query/sk1project.org
    which is a very good vector drawing program.

    mmm... I don't trust McAfee.
    And you cannot have any details on the reasons of their rating.
    I don't know how they rate sites. My guess is that they aggregate several sources, including DNS-BH (thus the sk1project.org misclassification).

    I really prefer WOT.

    This was my rambling of the day.

Comments:

  2. User picture
    • sebsauvage on Mon 21 Sep 2009
    • 10:13:48 AM UTC

    Title typo

    "McAfee TrustedSource... not to trusted. " ---> "McAfee TrustedSource... not so trusted. "
  3. User picture
    • LiVeRpUdLiAn932 on Mon 21 Sep 2009
    • 10:16:26 AM UTC

    Trusted Source is laughable

    http://www.trustedsource.org/query/freelotto.com
    Infamous spammer Freelotto spammed McAfee alot, according to their own charts, yet they rate it as Neutral.
    lastmeasure, infamous shock site, Neutral
    Laughable.
    You'll Never Walk Alone
  4. User picture
    • demonluo on Mon 21 Sep 2009
    • 08:03:32 PM UTC

    WOT >>>>> McAfee

    WOT >>>>> McAfee TrustedSource/SiteAdvisor - end of story -