(The quickest way to register)

Forum

  1. User picture
    • Stylw on Tue 29 Sep 2009
    • 09:17:10 AM UTC

    New domain rated red.

    I registered amusinggames.net a few days ago and have only recently found out it was rated red, could anyone help me rate it up to green so I don't lose visitors?

    :(

Comments:

  2. User picture
    • Sami on Tue 29 Sep 2009
    • 02:39:29 PM UTC

    Re: New domain

    Send a support request and we'll take a look. Usually, if the domain really is newly registered, no longer hosts the same content as it did before, and the ratings or comments clearly no longer apply to it, we'll make a note of this to the scorecard and reset the domain's reputation to unknown.
  3. User picture
    • g7w on Tue 29 Sep 2009
    • 09:05:29 PM UTC

    looks green to me

    Odd, one would think the site would be unrated; not having enough activity to display "colors" yet since it's registration was created on 20 SEP 2009

    But there are no blacklist references, checking mxtoolbox and hpHosts

    Site appears clean, has a Privacy Policy
    Games not working for me, standard or full screen

    Also got a few errors, here's one:

    A QUERY FAILED: UPDATE `AMCMS_ads` SET `status`='exhausted' WHERE `primkey`=;
    DETAILS: 1064 You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '' at line 1

    -------
    WOT Services Ltd. - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
    WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
    Thank you all
    - G7W
  4. User picture
    • tinfoil on Wed 30 Sep 2009
    • 05:19:51 PM UTC

    I'm getting suspicions that

    I'm getting suspicions that there are bots using WOT. I created a free redirecting domain on a subdomain that had no rating, and rated it. By the next day, there had been enough rates to get it a colour.
    • User picture
      • Sami on Wed 30 Sep 2009
      • 05:43:00 PM UTC

      Re: I'm getting suspicions that

      The system is pretty resistant to bots, so that's not the reason. There's no minimum number of ratings that a previously unknown site needs to have before it gets a reputation. Instead, there's a minimum level of confidence in the reputation. One rating from a trusted user can be enough, while at the same time any number of untrusted users can rate a site and it still won't get a reputation. In other words, the rating system is meritocratic.
      • User picture
        • tinfoil on Thu 01 Oct 2009
        • 03:01:02 PM UTC

        Thank you; I apologise.

        Thank you; I apologise.
        • User picture
          • difrawi_defrawy on Thu 01 Oct 2009
          • 04:37:09 PM UTC

          No need to

          You have the plight to question anything, whatever, whoever. It earns you trust :)
    • User picture
      • LiVeRpUdLiAn932 on Thu 01 Oct 2009
      • 10:42:32 AM UTC

      Gold level member

      You're a gold level member, so your rating weighs heavily on the site, unlike before when you were in lesser ranks. There arent any bots.
      You'll Never Walk Alone
      • User picture
        • Sami on Thu 01 Oct 2009
        • 11:03:34 AM UTC

        Re: User levels

        You're a gold level member, so your rating weighs heavily

        Actually, the user level is based on the activity score, which has nothing to do with how much weight your ratings have. As the name implies, the activity score only measures activity, not trust. There's sometimes correlation between the two, but not always.
  5. User picture
    • demonluo on Wed 30 Sep 2009
    • 09:06:11 PM UTC

    may be someone rate ur site

    may be someone rate ur site red w/o posting any comment...