Forum
Comments:
-
- on Tue 06 Oct 2009
- 01:02:04 AM UTC
live links!
please edit your post; edit is on the right side, top of page.
and remove the "http://"It's not courteous to place live links on unrated domains, what if they're not Trustworthy?
- Proper domain listing is:
- example.com
example.net
example.org
...
Why are they unrated?
Why have you not rated them?-------
WOT Services Ltd. - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
Thank you all
- G7W -
- on Sat 10 Oct 2009
- 09:16:01 PM UTC
re: which contained links to the site indicated
Make sure you read the headers of your email carefully, not all links in Spam are from the Spammer or the true destination for that Spam, if any. Sometimes Spam is sent to try to cause an honest site problems and lower it's reputation (in WOT or in Spam blacklist services).
-------
WOT Services Ltd. - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
Thank you all
- G7W -
- on Tue 06 Oct 2009
- 06:57:33 AM UTC
wot should give us a full
wot should give us a full list of unrated site...
on the main site not the forum...
-
- on Wed 07 Oct 2009
- 12:50:28 AM UTC
Hahaha
Do you know how many unrated domains there are? Mostly, the scorecards are automatically generated, then the WOT user rates or comments it. I have seen websites that are no longer up, have ratings and comments on them. The list would be too much for anyone to handle. Just rate sites as you go, and be relaxed about it. It is the easiest way to go about it. This place is not a race, it is a community where we keep each other safe, based on our own opinion/experience. Other user's do not have to heed advice from each other, but that is their risk - or opportunity - to proceed anyway.
~DragonMaster Jay, malware researcher,
Admin, helpmyos.com -
- on Tue 06 Oct 2009
- 06:20:13 PM UTC
g7w: I posted these links
g7w: I posted these links with http:// so they can be visited and rated.
About not having rated the sites, I stated that "My anti-virus isn't updated, so I better leave the rating to the security pros out there." I'm don't want to run the list of having this new laptop ruined by viruses, and I'm not really the person to be rating sites for their Trustworthiness.Warxas: I'm not a machine, and as such pick sites that I have found while surfing.
demonluo: That is a good idea.
-
- on Wed 07 Oct 2009
- 12:19:10 AM UTC
re: so they can be visited and rated
copy and paste google.com into your browser address bar, click enter and you have a live load; append mywot.com at the end of www.mywot.com/scorecard/ and you pull the scorecard.
Easy to visit or rate from the preferred safe domain name syntax of: example.com
-------
WOT Services Ltd. - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
Thank you all
- G7W -
- on Wed 07 Oct 2009
- 07:15:14 PM UTC
Re: re: so they can be visited and rated
The scorecard can be accessed by simple hovering over the link and pressing the button that pops up. If I were to make all these links link to the scorecard, visiting them for rating (which is what this topic is about) would be much harder.
Also, I clearly stated that clicking these links is a risk you only take if you want to.
[I apologize if I am sounding rude, but my English is not really the best] -
- on Thu 08 Oct 2009
- 12:49:55 AM UTC
"My anti-virus isn't updated"
Excuse me for asking such a simple question,
but nevertheless: Why not updated..? -
- on Sat 10 Oct 2009
- 03:00:11 PM UTC
Re: "My anti-virus isn't updated"
I haven't gotten around to registering it yet. Don't ask.
-
- on Sat 10 Oct 2009
- 03:29:05 PM UTC
A lot of these are taken
A lot of these are taken from a list that I posted a short time ago, then took down. I'm not usually bothered about credit, especially when it comes to small things such as this, but, for some reason... your lack of credit disturbs me.
-
- on Sat 10 Oct 2009
- 05:58:45 PM UTC
It's all right;l you may use
It's all right;l you may use it without credit. I apologize for my earlier comment; I was too aggressive.
-
- on Wed 02 Dec 2009
- 10:44:08 PM UTC
OK seriously now
Don't you realize how pointless this is?
Either rate them or go away.
And like was said before, it's not very nice to live-link to sites with an unknown reputation.
You could just create a program that cycled through every alphanumeric character to forty characters in length, using all top level domains, and come up with a gargantuan list of sites that have no WOT ratings.
Get to it. We'll see you in ten years.
-
- on Wed 20 Jan 2010
- 03:38:17 AM UTC
galaxyfox.com
http://galaxyfox.com
-
- on Wed 20 Jan 2010
- 04:14:36 AM UTC
Seems not to understand the
Seems not to understand the comments above...
Kill the links!________________________________________________________________
............Tattered Wings and a Tarnished Halo........... -
- on Sat 01 May 2010
- 02:48:52 AM UTC
re: Hey
Interesting...
- The OP and the immediate reply (2nd post) were edited and the links were removed:
- POST REMOVED
Fri 30 Apr 2010 10:17:46 PM UTC — ABCRic NewPOST REMOVED
- Your post - the one this reply is to - states:
- Hey
Fri 30 Apr 2010 10:52:14 PM UTC — PrO AcTiVe ViTaMi... RecentI rated all your sites that wasnt rated.
How did you rate a domain list that was deleted 35 minutes before you could view / rate them?
My guess is:
ABCRic = PrO AcTiVe ViTaMiABCRic was last active (viewing profile) 26 January 2010 until the two edits on this thread.
coincidentally
PrO AcTiVe ViTaMi started in Jan 2010 and the 1st scorecard comment was 27 January 2010.Forum guidelines
8. Only register one account
You may register only one account. -
- on Sat 01 May 2010
- 08:13:06 AM UTC
Hmmmmm . . .
No offense intended to ProActiVe VitaMi, but ABCRic writes much better English. If they are one and the same, then the ABCRic personality seems almost schizo in differences. Those differences in expression are substantial.
This by no means discounts your theory, Dave, but if it's true then this person has a serious case of a split personality syndrome.
-
- on Sat 01 May 2010
- 08:49:03 AM UTC
Re: Hmmmmm . . . . .
No offense intended to ProActiVe VitaMi, but ABCRic writes much better English. If they are one and the same, then the ABCRic personality seems almost schizo in differences. Those differences in expression are substantial
That´s also what i believe.Although i have to admit that a good actor can change his way of appearing.But why should he?
Blueberrycake Level Member of the WOT Community
-
- on Mon 03 May 2010
- 02:05:06 AM UTC
Rating is OK
No problem with rating a site. More power to you on that.
But the issue this topic has morphed into is whether or not you and ABCRic are one and the same. Are you?
Wait a minute, wait a minute . . . now I'm getting confused.
There was a "PrO AcTiVe ViTaMiN..." screen name, to which g7w was referring to, you are "VP-ViTaMiN PrOtEcTiOn-VP" (and apparently changed from "ViTaMiN PrOtEcTiOn CoMpAnY") and then there's "ABCRic". Two of those screen names are not only transposed, but one is "PrO AcTiVe . . . " and the other is "PrOtEcTiOn . . ."
This is all very confusing, especially with the lower case/caps stuff.
So, are you also "PrO AcTiVe ViTaMiN..." in addition to "ABCRic"?
We need to get all these identities/screen names correct in order to determine who is responding to what.
-
- on Mon 03 May 2010
- 02:41:45 PM UTC
hehehe
NOOOO Im PrO AcTiVe ViTaMiN D13...I was first .BaLoK. but than changed name to PrO AcTiVe ViTaMiN D13 and than to VP-ViTaMiN PrOtEcTiOn-VP...Im not ABRCIC...and I dont know who he is...only that he post here unrated sites...and I have rated they...and asked have he new...I dont know whats there bad...
-
- on Thu 12 Aug 2010
- 01:23:11 PM UTC
After reading the
After reading the criticizing replies, I went and removed my posts.
I do not want this discussion to continue. It is clear that I made a mistake by posting this topic, and I hereby close it.About VP-PrO AcTiVe ViT, (I believe) it was a coincidence that he/she posted right after I removed the list. Like he/she said, he looked on Google, which probably had a cache of this page that was not yet updated.
Alternatively, he/she could have had the topic open before my edit.Sorry for bumping this topic. I still have this link bookmarked and visited it by accident, and was confronted with these replies.
I did not and never will create another account on the same site, specially because I don't see what's the use in doing so.
Furthermore, I am not even capable of writing such English (no offense intended).Sig: Stay safe. Use WOT.
List of Unrated websites
POST REMOVED
Sig: Stay safe. Use WOT.