Forum
Comments:
-
- on Mon 12 Oct 2009
- 06:47:02 AM UTC
I want them to comment...
I want Panda to comment here, and let us know the deal about this.
I saw the comment by them. I have heard A LOT of people judging the reliability of Panda for two years now. It is about time they get uncovered. So let's have it!
~DragonMaster Jay, malware researcher,
Admin, helpmyos.com -
- on Mon 12 Oct 2009
- 08:46:19 AM UTC
Re: Panda really?
There's a file hosted on google.com, which contains apparently user contributed content that matches a virus signature.
-
- on Mon 12 Oct 2009
- 10:48:04 AM UTC
then all legal file hosting
then all legal file hosting site should be blacklisted for hosting user contributed content coz any user can upload virus anytime they like & its impossible to be 100% clean so panda should not anyhow rate it poor...
-
- on Mon 12 Oct 2009
- 11:37:54 AM UTC
My point is...
Evaluating something fully should be done by Panda. The user contributed content idea has gotten so strong that the most, if not all, sites in the top 10 sites on the web, allow user contributed content.
Would that be Panda's opinion or verifiable research? Which is why I would like them to check in here with details, or if anyone has any articles/related material to present. I have a hard time believing the content is that bad, in which an underrated security company is blacklisting the #1 website on the web,
~DragonMaster Jay, malware researcher,
Admin, helpmyos.com


Panda really?
Because of their "malware blacklist" Google's scorecard
Has one Malicious content, viruses entry.
I am sure we all remember the scare tactics; thread
So how reliable are they?