Comments:

2. 

   • Demiann on Wed 10 Mar 2010
   • 05:08:12 PM UTC

   Change my previous message language

   Modify the language of my previous message that can be understood:

   Hello community I hope misunderstood to translate my message.

   Investigating as Wot as some malicious web recognized by age found online, I found that the level of reputation does not correspond to the danger of these sites, we are talking about belonging to distributors of malware, which all of your downloads contain variants Vundo, Virut and Sality sites, these web also put at risk the browser vulnerabilities which means don't even need to do a download to infect, with only vistar site is enough, then put them the link Wot and not sites for obvious security reasons valuation:

   http://www.mywot.com/scorecard/serials.ws
   http://www.mywot.com/scorecard/megaserials.com
   http://www.mywot.com/scorecard/astalavista.com
   http://www.mywot.com/scorecard/astalavista.ms

   The last longer laugh, if notice also affect the majority of the comments correspond to dangerous sites, which makes me think that those who use methods to circumvent the real reputation should have are the same cyber criminals, the site owners.

   Also note questionable qualifications in the sites siguienters:

   http://www.mywot.com/scorecard/portalhacker.net
   http://www.mywot.com/scorecard/foro.portalhacker.n...

   Does not lack making comments about it, which makes me wonder what is there any way the cybercriminals not circumventing qualifications that these sites should have?

   I leave for consideration and I hope that you have understood the meaning of my message.

   Thank you and greetings.

   •  Login or Register to post comments
• 

  • mntidagold on Wed 10 Mar 2010
  • 06:24:19 PM UTC

  affiliate networks

  Affiliate networks are the ones I worry the most about. Since I use them, you never know how safe your personal information is and if a site has a bad reputation is it because a user was simply pissed? You never can tell. I think WOT is on the right track and after more people become involved and use the add-on this should start separating the bad from the good sites.

  •  Login or Register to post comments
• 

  • Demiann on Wed 10 Mar 2010
  • 10:06:09 PM UTC

  Thanks for the comment.

  Said you that my English is almost zero and this can hinder that I want to express.

  I am not criticising Wot I believe excellent, or to the community, my point is that while the sites mentioned are malicious, and users have largely been negative ratings sites do not change to the qualification that should have.

  This suggests that there is some sort of intervention by the criminals who created that malicious site.

  For example this astalavista.ms in green and the dangerousness of the site not only by downloads in its entirety with malware, should be in red, besides many negative comments from users and even other means that values Wot as hpHosts.

  Also commented that the sites mentioned are tested by me, I know testing samples in search again malware.

  Best regards!

  •  Login or Register to post comments