(The quickest way to register)

Forum

Dear visitor! The webpage is only available in English. We're sorry for the inconvenience.
  1. User picture
    • g7w on Fri 19 Mar 2010
    • 11:10:18 PM UTC

    stopzilla.com

    I, along with several other Community members have been spammed the same comment by user: stopzilla
    Re: Your STOPzilla review.
    We are the owners and operators of STOPzilla & STOPzilla.com. Your posted comments about our product and website are absolutely false, libelous and misleading.

    Below are multiple links from reputable sources which prove that our company acts responsibly and does not engage in any of the activities you described. Furthermore, STOPzilla has won numerous awards and has been certified by the well respected West Coast Labs testing organization. STOPzilla is 100% clean of any malicious code or behavior whatsoever. Any comment contrary to this is an absolute fabrication and is considered libel.

    We are reaching out to you amicably and we trust that you will act responsibly and remove all these libelous comments immediately.

    Regards,
    The STOPzilla Team!
    seo@stopzilla.com
    1-877-877-9944

    · Anti-Virus Scan Reports:
    http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/e56cffac4ce76c0......
    http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/scanresult/5658bf478......

    West Coast Labs Certification:
    http://www.westcoastlabs.com/about/press/release/?...

    STOPzilla Awards:
    http://www.is3.com/media/awards.do

    How STOPzilla Works:
    http://www.stopzilla.com/learning/HowSTOPzillaWorks.do

    Finalist in 2008 for “Stevie Award” for excellence in customer:
    http://www.stevieawards.com/pubs/awards/403_2436_17725.cfm

    I posted the above message to me on the Forums, since it was not a privately sent PM.

    When ever anyone claims:
    Your posted comments about our product and website are absolutely false, libelous and misleading.

    While those claims are backed up by other reputable websites, such as:
    At a glance - reviews by PC Magazine
    STOPzilla has a cute name, but it costs more than the best standalone antispyware programs and does less. Yes, it offers some bonus features for Internet Explorer, but they're things that IE already does...and does better.

    So-so performance protecting a clean system; allowed several rootkits and Trojan horses to install. Phishing protection is significantly less effective than what's built into IE and Firefox.

    Wikipedia Stopzilla article
    Several sources note STOPzilla is ineffective or even rogue anti-spyware. The "web of trust" ("WOT") community has claimed that STOPzilla is malicious rogue software.

    PC Magazine's review references (in the "Cons" section) issues with effectiveness and notes that the "Bottom Line" was that "STOPzilla has a cute name, but it costs more than the best standalone antispyware programs and does less. Yes, it does offer some bonus features for Internet Explorer, but they're things that IE already does...and does better."

    Forums on the website for competitor Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware contains some criticism of STOPzilla that is even more unenthusiastic, such as "I believe that this one has been classified as scraping the edge of rogue for a while but not quite crossing it . Certainly it is not a recommended antimalware application ." "I know that it turns up" ... "a lot" ... "when I go looking for new rogues."

    The iS3 website shows the vendor is aware that their program has been unscrupulously marketed by tactics that include "tampering with searches, adware, hijacking, use of Trojans" by members of their affiliate program.

    On the other hand, in September 2008, STOPzilla received antispyware certification from West Coast Labs.

    If you examine the Scorecard for stopzilla, you will find good comments posted mostly by users with low involvement in WOT and some of them even rate host-files.net low because it references stopzilla in it's hosts file database.

    Is3 / Stopzilla references, "West Coast Labs certification".
    Actually West Coast Labs only states that Stopilla "installs" and has the "check mark" to prove it.
    You need to ask yourself, just who is West Coast Labs, and who makes them the "authority" of security software review?
    Admitedly, West Coast Labs is owned by a media company called:
    Haymarket Publishing Limited / haymarket.com
    If you visit their website, and scroll to the bottom of the page, it has a copyright notice:
    (c) 1957 - 2010
    1957? The Internet didn't exist in 1957 and if this media company is so established, why did it not get it's domain name before Aug 14, 2006
    You can see by the site's scorecard that though not many have rated it, it doesn't seem to hold a good reputation.

    I guess to be "certified" by West Coast Labs, you need to pay them to say your are "legitimate" They have other rogue brand names on their site, but I couldn't fid many reputable names, like any of the AV / anti-malware products I personally use...

    ------- WOT Services Ltd. - gives us safety through Web of Trust. WOT Community - gives us security through unity. ∞

Comments:

  1. User picture
    • g7w on Sat 20 Mar 2010
    • 03:12:38 AM UTC

    the rabbit hole

    I have chosen to rate these as a scam since the product(s) are rogue-like.
    My scorecard comments will merely point to this forum topic.
    Your rating and or comments may disagree with me as it should be within a Community where everyone doesn't see things the same way.

    List of domains/hosts:

    38.117.8.194
    38.117.8.196
    38.117.8.91
    38.117.8.92
    877help.com
    877help.net
    877lead.net
    877leads.net
    a-vzilla.net
    adwarezilla.net
    ahp4u.net
    ahserv.net
    auctioncommercepro.com
    av-zilla.net
    avzilla.net
    best-popup-blocker-download.net
    bigfateasy.net
    bigfatez.net
    cantbuyforless.net
    cleanthatpc.net
    clickverify.net
    cookiezilla.net
    danielocity.net
    desktopdefender.net
    digitalidvault.net
    downloadzilla.net
    dr3media.net
    fatglobe.net
    fatorb.net
    fatsea.net
    fatsee.net
    hijackzilla.net
    historyzilla.com
    home.is3.com
    internetsecurityzone.net
    is3.com
    is3antifraud.net
    is3deal.net
    is3deals.net
    is3media.com
    is3media.net
    is3search.net
    is3siteguard.net
    is3systems.net
    is3techsupport.com
    isss.com
    loan-zone.net
    macsecurityzone.net
    mail.is3.com
    mail2.is3.com
    merc10.com
    merc10.net
    nanniezilla.net
    nannyzilla.net
    noclickspam.net
    ns1.isss.com
    ns2.isss.com
    ns3.isss.com
    ns4.isss.com
    parasitesearch.net
    pcsecurityshield.com
    pcsecurityzone.net
    pcss.com
    popup-blocker-download.com
    popup-blocker-download.net
    popup-killer-download.net
    popup-stopper-download.net
    popupkillersreviewed.net
    postzilla.com
    postzilla.net
    privacyzilla.net
    repairzilla.net
    rhinodeal.net
    rhinodeals.net
    rinodeal.net
    rinodeals.net
    rocketzilla.net
    scanzilla.net
    searchverify.net
    sensory1.com
    siteguardsearch.net
    spamzilla.net
    spywarefreenetwork.net
    spywaresquasher.net
    spywarezilla.net
    squadzilla.net
    stopzilla.com
    stopzilla.net
    stopzillapro.net
    threatlevel.com
    toolbarzilla.net
    tophatloans.net
    tophatmortgage.net
    tophattax.net
    tophattech.net
    toptechpicks.net
    updatesdomain.com
    winshredder.com
    zilaclean.net
    zilaform.net
    zilasquad.net
    zilatrain.net
    zillabar.net
    zillabase.net
    zillablog.net
    zillabox.net
    zillaclaus.com
    zillaclean.net
    zilladeal.net
    zilladeals.net
    zilladealz.net
    zillafind.com
    zillafind.net
    zillaform.net
    zillasafe.com
    zillasafe.net
    zillascan.net
    zillascanner.net
    zillasense.net
    zillashare.net
    zillashield.net
    zillasites.net
    zillasmart.com
    zillasmart.net
    zillasoftware.net
    zillasquad.net
    zillastore.net
    zillastuff.net
    zillasuite.net
    zillasweep.net
    zillatrain.net
    zillatune.net
    zillatunes.net
    zillawall.com
    zillawall.net
    zillaware.net

  2. User picture
    • evilfantasy on Sat 20 Mar 2010
    • 02:55:41 PM UTC

    Your claims of good reviews

    Good reviews are bought all of the time. STOPZilla will have to come with much more evidence than reviews to change my rating. Start with removing the false findings that scare users into buying a license.

    Is it showing as a virus at VirusTotal and other file scanners? No. That's because a rouge and a virus are two different things. You should know that! I said your software is a rouge, not a virus.

    • User picture
      • g7w on Sat 20 Mar 2010
      • 03:15:11 PM UTC

      re: virustotal

      It had positive results in the past, back when the "installer" was around 384kb in size, it has been modified and reduced to approx 64kb and no longer returns positive results from VT.

  3. User picture
    • IssViews on Sat 20 Mar 2010
    • 03:43:45 AM UTC

    I just had the same message

    I just had the same message from STOPzilla and I have to say I regarded it as rather threatening considering I was stating my view/option of the product based on my experience and reliable sources. I will not change my rating or comments untill STOPzilla address many issues with the product and their marketing plus get other accreditatiion from companies other than West Coast Labs.

    I agree with the above posters especially g7w and WOT users who rated this product poorly. You should seriouisly look at why your product is failing in the eyes of many people.

    HpHosts have you listed as FSA (Bogus or fraudulent software) which goes to confirm my own findings and view as it is far too invasive on privacy and fails to give adequate protection compared to many leading brands.

    www.issviews.com for views and news of the starte of digital security. Add your comments/.feedback on your existing security software to help others choose what's right for them and what isn't. Read up on the latest rogue software and threats too.

  4. User picture
    • shazza on Sat 20 Mar 2010
    • 12:33:06 PM UTC

    Thanks g7w,

    All sites rated / commented.

  5. User picture
    • TheBonobo4 on Sat 20 Mar 2010
    • 02:14:09 PM UTC

    All sites rated

    All sites rated appropriately.

    Platinum Level Member of the WOT Community.

  6. User picture
    • IssViews on Sat 20 Mar 2010
    • 05:42:52 PM UTC

    Thanks for the info g7w :D

    Thanks for the info g7w :D Rated and commented.

    I have blogged this, if anyone wants a read. http://issviews.com/blog/?p=352

    Having seen exactly what domains STOPzilla is hosting and associated to, I am even more convinced that there are malicious intentions within that company.
    www.issviews.com for views and news of the starte of digital security. Add your comments/.feedback on your existing security software to help others choose what's right for them and what isn't. Read up on the latest rogue software and threats too.

  7. User picture
    • Zammy67rocks2 on Sat 20 Mar 2010
    • 06:51:53 PM UTC

    Don't forget this when your reminded of FAIL-zilla:

    That Rouge Anti-Viruses are evil!

  8. User picture
    • jpvip on Sun 21 Mar 2010
    • 01:33:30 AM UTC

    Awards...

    I have talked to IS3 in the past, and have asked them to apply links to those awards on their website of STOPzilla.com. Check out the Award pictures on the front page and the awards page.

    Right now, I am neutral about IS3. Although, their products are not rogue.

    Current VT url: http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/12cf8f23b0f3d14...

    1. It can not be classified as "rogue" because there is no unsolicited intrusion/penetration into the system
    2. There is no explicit enforcement to buy a higher/pro version of the same program.
    3. Detection of the mentioned program is based on behavior (such as registry changes)
    4. Can not find any illegitimate advertisements/offers in program.

    ~DragonMaster Jay - Malware Analyst - admin of Advanced Malware Analysts.

    • User picture
      • g7w on Sun 21 Mar 2010
      • 11:38:14 AM UTC

      re: classified as "rogue"

      It can not be classified as "rogue" because there is no unsolicited intrusion/penetration into the system
      Sure there is, you just never downloaded the installation and checked.

      First, the download file: STOPzilla_Setup.exe (~385kb) is an installer.
      The 14.52MB (real) file is downloaded via the installer, you can not install StopZilla off line, you must have internet access for the basic installation.

      During the install, chose "Custom - for advanced user" you are presented with 2 prechecked options for "homepage protection" and for "StopZilla Safety Network"

      Deselect those options and continue with installation.

      In your startups you'll see: sziebho.dll re: file.net
      This is an internet Explorer browser helper object, designed to stop websites from changing your homepage settings, and to eliminate popups.

      This option was deselected during install, and it's a persistent little devil; causes WinPatrol to popup often asking to confirm addition to startups; naturally I said "no"
      It's not a malicious file, winpatrol has a page for it:
      http://www.winpatrol.com/db/plus2009/sziebho.html?...

      I don't use IE for one...
      IE has a built-in popup blocker since IE7 - IE6 is officially dead

      So what do you call adding startup service for BHO's assigned to a browser you do not use when you deselected it's functionality during the install process?
      I call that rogue

      Now, this is not freeware and I have no problems with paid for AV software...
      But my problem with this is that you downlaod a 385kb installer file, which downloads a 14 1/2 MB setup file, that installs system processes you elected not to use, then after reboot, you run a system scan and then you are informed of "problems" that do not exist on your machine, and you can only "see" them - you need to pay to unlock, to remove what is not there. That is called scareware BTW.

      Sorry I did not take screen captures of every event, I didn't feel it was worth my time.

      One other little thing: tpsvc.dll - bleeping startup - bleeping HJT
      O20 Section

      AppInit_DLLs

      This section corresponds to files being loaded through the AppInit_DLLs Registry value and the Winlogon Notify Subkeys

      The AppInit_DLLs registry value contains a list of dlls that will be loaded when user32.dll is loaded. As most Windows executables use the user32.dll, that means that any DLL that is listed in the AppInit_DLLs registry key will be loaded also. This makes it very difficult to remove the DLL as it will be loaded within multiple processes, some of which can not be stopped without causing system instability. The user32.dll file is also used by processes that are automatically started by the system when you log on. This means that the files loaded in the AppInit_DLLs value will be loaded very early in the Windows startup routine allowing the DLL to hide itself or protect itself before we have access to the system.

      This method is known to be used by a CoolWebSearch variant and can only be seen in Regedit by right-clicking on the value, and selecting Modify binary data. Registrar Lite, on the other hand, has an easier time seeing this DLL.

      Registry Key: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows\\AppInit_DLLs

      • User picture
        • jpvip on Mon 22 Mar 2010
        • 01:46:29 PM UTC

        Analysis

        Sure there is, you just never downloaded the installation and checked.

        Umm, yes I did. I don't make foolish statements like that.

        Just like the malware researchers at all the security companies, tested just like I did, and did not find anything wrong.

        Security programs are known to hook the system, so it can protect the system. Many security programs do not even protect, some just detect and remove.

        The research that you have done, is not enough information to present it as rogue.

        Rogues commonly inject itself in to Windows processes, install malware on to the system, perform unsolicited popup advertisements and harsh warnings on the
        system to enforce that the program needs to be purchased.

        STOPzilla posts one advertisement to buy the higher version. There is no penetration in the System, the program only hooks certain Windows areas, just like other anti-spyware programs do.

        I did not say I was a fan, but I am neutral about it.

        ==================================

        :::Actual analysis::: 3-19-2010

        >-Install process begins... all options checked and ready to go.
        ---C:\12057665.exe unique file connects to download STOPzilla and install it automatically.---

        !-Kaspersky Internet Security 9: All protection enabled. Checking all files, !! PROMPT !!: "STOPzilla Setup (iS3, Inc.) wants to connect to the Internet"!

        -Action: ALLOW! - STOPzilla has now begun installing. !!! BEGIN CHECK !!!
        -> KNOWN PROCESSES BEGIN RUN: C:\12057665.exe (Reason: install), C:\Windows\System32\Services.exe (Reason: software configuration management), C:\Windows\System32\svchost.exe (Reason: DCOM), and C:\Windows\System32\svchost.exe (Reason: SVCHOST).

        +++++++++++++BEGIN QUESTIONING ACTIONS++++++++++
        -Downloads executable files? Verdict: NO! Files required for the program to run were downloaded.
        -Downloads to System32 or Windows folders? Verdict: NO!
        -Copies to Windows folder? Verdict: NO!
        -Creates hidden executable files? Verdict: NO!
        -Connects via WinSock? Verdict: YES!
        -WinLogon Registry Key set creation? Verdict: NO!
        -Creates or starts executable files? Verdict: YES! STOPzilla.exe began, and added a tray icon.
        -Deletes files in the System? Verdict: NO!
        -Kills security software? Verdict: NO!
        -Hooks keyboard or mouse? Verdict: NO!
        -Unauthorized change of home page? Verdict: NO!
        -Creates mutex object? Verdict: YES!
        -Sends data via DNS/IP? Verdict: NO!
        -Deletes original sample? Verdict: NO!
        -Kills processes? Verdict: NO!
        -Injects code in to any file? Verdict: NO!
        -Sends email? Verdict: NO!
        -Alters Windows Firewall? Verdict: NO!
        -Queries driver or service information? Verdict: NO!
        -Attempts to autostart at Windows Boot? Verdict: NO!
        -Opens or modifies the HOSTS file? Verdict: NO!
        -Changes Internet Explorer or other browser proxy? Verdict: NO!
        -BHO Installed? Verdict: YES! It is part of the program.
        -More than 5 processes? Verdict: NO!
        -Checks for debugger? Verdict: NO!
        -Loaded or unloaded drivers? Verdict: NO!
        -Windows API Calls? Verdict: NO!
        -Infected? Verdict: NO!
        -MD5 checked against all engines? Verdict: YES! Result: 1/48 ENGINE MCAFEE ARTEMIS
        -SHA1 checked against all engines? Verdict: YES! Result: 1/48 ENGINE MCAFEE ARTEMIS

        ==== MALWARE ANALYSIS COMPLETE ====

        ~DragonMaster Jay - Malware Analyst - admin of Advanced Malware Analysts.

        • User picture
          • MassimilianoF on Thu 22 Apr 2010
          • 11:58:32 PM UTC

          What analysis tool did you

          What analysis tool did you use to obtain such results?
          -----
          MF IT-UESC - Protecting your Digital Experience. Now.

          • User picture
            • jpvip on Fri 23 Apr 2010
            • 01:49:40 AM UTC

            ...

            That is an analysis process, not a tool.

            ~DragonMaster Jay - Malware Analyst - admin of Advanced Malware Analysts.

            • User picture
              • MassimilianoF on Fri 23 Apr 2010
              • 01:42:31 PM UTC

              Yes, but how did you obtain

              Yes, but how did you obtain it. I'm asking you because I'm really interested and I would know more about it.
              -----
              MF IT-UESC - Protecting your Digital Experience. Now.

              • User picture
                • jpvip on Fri 23 Apr 2010
                • 07:10:12 PM UTC

                Tons of tools.

                There are a lot of tools used for the analysis, but not just one tool.

                Using objects like WireShark, virus scanners (non-mainstream), malware analysis tools (non-reverse), VirusTotal/virScan, Kaspersky file scanner, sandbox, file analysis tools, driver analysis tools, Kaspersky Internet Security, Windows Registry, Windows Task Manager, and several other small tools.

                ~DragonMaster Jay - Malware Analyst - admin of Advanced Malware Analysts.

  9. User picture
    • hotdoge3 on Sun 21 Mar 2010
    • 09:49:23 AM UTC

    bing it “STOPzilla”. sucks 1,710 results

    http://hosts-file.net/?s=download.stopzilla.com (Classification:FSA) "rogue" security

    http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/stopzilla.com/sum...

    http://www.antispyware-softwarereviews.com/reviews...

    hasn't updated there software in a few years …and it shows.

    http://download.cnet.com/Stopzilla/3640-8022_4-106...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stopzilla

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Stopzilla

    http://www.crystalidea.com/uninstall-stopzilla

    Many users complain of difficult removal process of STOPzilla Anti-Spyware product.

    http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0%2C2817%2C2162968%2... (Read the STOPzilla 5.0 full review)
    Hiding negative complaints is only a Band-Aid.

  10. User picture
    • Steven Avery on Sun 21 Mar 2010
    • 11:53:15 PM UTC

    stopzilla - usual motley crew of scamware, shamware & scareware

    Hi Folks,

    Thanks for the rogue documentation g7w.

    The programs that are not what they seem are really a problem, be it Regcure, StopZilla or the Uniblue registry and speedup or 100 others. And think of those TV and radio ads too for other bogus "speed up" stuff. Some are worse than others, all are bad news, the semi-legit ones are in a sense MORE of a problem, because of all their efforts to manipulate forums, surveys, awards ... and journalists. They require more due diligence, such as WOT-awareness.

    As for StopZilla, the Wilders Security folks are well aware of the worthlessness of the product as well.

    STOPzilla as AV?
    http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=21...

    You can find a number of threads.

    Shalom,
    Steven Avery

  11. User picture
    • The Technical Expert on Thu 22 Apr 2010
    • 02:37:45 PM UTC

    Stopzilla, a scareware and a crapware

    You see that Stopzilla says our comments are libelous. It asks to remove or comments, but don't listen!, because our comments are TRUE!
    You can mail the Stopzilla team at seo@stopzilla.com .

    • User picture
      • IssViews on Thu 22 Apr 2010
      • 05:00:30 PM UTC

      Thanks but I feel it would

      Thanks but I feel it would only fall on deaf ears and subject me to legal threats etc. Will pass on any contact with them other than in this forum and thread.

      www.issviews.com for views and news of the starte of digital security. Add your comments/.feedback on your existing security software to help others choose what's right for them and what isn't. Read up on the latest rogue software and threats too.

  12. User picture
    • Meat_Wagon on Thu 22 Apr 2010
    • 10:52:24 PM UTC

    StopZilla.

    Tried it, & it IS bad news! 3 of my A/V progs pegged it as hi-threat malware during their 1st sweeps thru it & all the other places it plonks a file/dependency outside Prog-Files. Even the install file showed hot!
    Managed to rid myself of it in XP safe mode and regedit.
    Kill the Zilla!

    M_W

  13. User picture
    • AlphaCentauri on Thu 22 Apr 2010
    • 11:40:08 PM UTC

    Stopzilla

    It sounds like bad marketing has made a mediocre product come off as malicious. Our tech support people suggested installing the paid version on a machine at work that had a rootkit. The installed AV program, Avira, wouldn't update and didn't recognize any problem files when it scanned. Malwarebytes Antimalware refused to install at all. Stopzilla was suggested as a program that sometimes succeeded when other failed. In this case, since the problem was the malware was disabling other programs, Stopzilla's obscurity was a plus and it was successful. Did it remove all the malware? No. Once it ran a couple times and was coming up clean, we were able to update Avira, and it found several more files. Then Malwarebytes would finally install, and it found still more. There have been no annoyances since it's been installed, but we purchased the program in the first place rather than using a free trial. I wonder if people's opinions would be different if Stopzilla's marketing practices were different?

    • User picture
      • MassimilianoF on Fri 23 Apr 2010
      • 12:01:49 AM UTC

      In these case, try an

      In these case, try an Emergency Live-CD. It's better.
      -----
      MF IT-UESC - Protecting your Digital Experience. Now.

  14. User picture
    • blf0804@yahoo.com on Thu 10 Jun 2010
    • 03:29:03 PM UTC

    stopzilla

    I just had a spyware on my home computer and called the tech support. The gentlemen I talked to was alot of help and understanding. He helped me get what I needed and he went beyond what any tech person would have done for me. I will use stopzilla for my computers.

    • User picture
      • Danerd9 on Thu 18 Nov 2010
      • 07:44:52 AM UTC

      IGNORE HIM

      This guy is trying to boost the rep of Stopzilla. This constant mixing of opinions confuse the person.
      Listen to me people!
      Stopzilla is a rouge!
      It's bogus protection covered in bogus ads!
      Don't get it!
      You'll REGRET IT!

  15. User picture
    • dustywarrior on Sat 07 Aug 2010
    • 07:29:04 PM UTC

    stopzilla question

    ok well im confused about stopzilla, i've read in a few places that its no use, but then i've read several places (including this http://www.computinghelp.info/stopzilla-anti-spyware-review/ ) that's its very effective. If it offers real time protection I figured it must be quite good? but reading through these posts im not sure!

    anybody got the real truth behind it?

    • User picture
      • mentalist3d on Sat 07 Aug 2010
      • 08:12:12 PM UTC

      Reviews can be bought by

      Reviews can be bought by companies so I wouldn't trust them much (I never looked at the review that you have posted). From what I have seen on the Forum users such as G7W and ISSViews, do usually do an indepth review of sites that they are rating, so I am more inclined to trust their reviews knowing that the claims they have made are usually well researched first.

    • User picture
      • g7w on Sun 08 Aug 2010
      • 12:59:33 AM UTC

      re: stopzilla question

      hxxp://www.computinghelp.info/stopzilla-review/

      Naturally this site is going to offer a "good review"
      It offers an affiliate link, so you click it, and purchase SZ and they get paid.
      Here's the destination link:
      hxxp://www.stopzilla.com/products/stopzilla/spywareremover-white.do?aid=10731&cid=43111

      Thanks for referencing this domain; rated - ethical issues: promotes known rogue software.
      computinghelp.info
      -------
      WOT Services Ltd. - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
      WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
      Thank you all
      - G7W

  16. User picture
    • glil on Mon 18 Oct 2010
    • 11:57:07 AM UTC

    stopzilla-Rogue not ROUGE!!

    Please people learn to spell!!~ Stopzilla claims it is not a ROUGE! Rouge is what your (great) grandma put on her face. I wonder if the scum at stopzilla misspelled it purposely!! "We aren't makeup.. Why do people keep calling us makeup???":

    Sarah Palin made the opposite mistake. When she first saw her book that was written for her, she picked it up, and read the title and said, "Going ROUGE... This must be about my beauty queen career!!"..... if you don't get it... don't lose any sleep over it....

  17. User picture
    • Danerd9 on Thu 18 Nov 2010
    • 07:41:24 AM UTC

    Download.com reviews

    GUYS LOOK!
    At download.com, there are so many fake reviews that 5 star and glorify Stopzilla like crazy!
    I did a 1 star rating and I got 1/29 people agreed with me.

    Those 28 other people must've been the staff members of the company that make this bogus antivirus. They wanted to make my review look bad.
    This is bad, they're deceiving other people! It's not right! They pay to promote a bad product.
    http://download.cnet.com/Stopzilla/3000-8022_4-101...

  18. User picture
    • top124 on Thu 25 Nov 2010
    • 06:19:39 PM UTC

    ROGUE!!!!

    ROGUE!!!!!

    Bronze WOT member. please post on my forum if you find a false positive in one of my comments. thank you