Forum
Comments:
-
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 02:17:06 PM UTC
Scorecard: Comments: Editing
If I check "agree" on someone's comment, and they edit it, what happens? Do I still "agree" with it?
Here's my suggestion: Upon edit, all "agree" marks should be invalidated. Users would have a place to re-validate their agreement with edited comments. (No need to keep old versions of comments -- just allow users to say "Yeah, I still agree" or "No, I don't agree.")
-
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 02:23:56 PM UTC
RE: Scorecard: Comments: Editing
I agree.. but don't edit your post otherwise I might have to change my mind. :P But seriously, that is a good idea.
-
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 03:47:20 PM UTC
Good idea!
Editing comments is always a tricky thing to deal with. That's a good idea! Though if "agree" marks are to be invalidated, shouldn't "Flag" marks be cleared as well?
-
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 06:18:01 PM UTC
Editing Comments
It does seem as though all previous agreements (or not) should be invalidated after an edit. However, how are the WOT ratings themselves handled when a web site is found to have changed substantially? At one time it may have gained a trusted rating but, for example, it comes under new management and begins containing spyware.
-
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 07:33:00 PM UTC
Re: Editing Comments
You're right, it's very much possible for a site to change from trustworthy to unreliable over time as companies go bankrupt, for example. I think I might have covered this in one of very first blog posts, but I could be wrong.
So basically, the problem is that users rate a website, the site dies a few years later, users move along and forget about ever rating it. Then the domain name is sold to a highest bidder and the new owner turns out to be a scammer.
WOT solves this by considering old ratings to be less valuable than new ones, which are naturally based on fresh experiences. Of course, there are a large number of other factors involved too, but this allows ratings to adapt in a situation where a site's trustworthiness suddenly changes.
Just in case anyone is wondering about their ratings losing value, there's no need to worry, ratings are refreshed every time the add-on loads them from our server.
-
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 04:40:22 PM UTC
Re: Scorecard: Comments: Editing
All valid points. Thanks for the feedback!
-
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 05:11:55 PM UTC
Scorecard:adding comments
Hello, i Russian speaking user, so i tried to add comment in cyrrilic symbols, since this site localized also in Russian ans using UTF-8 codepage i expected no problem at all....but after adding commen i see it as "?????????? ?????????? ????????? ???????", you can see it here - http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/webmoney.ru
This is just a bug or whole system no created to accept comments in non-latin languages?
I.m using Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9pre) Gecko/2008041406 Minefield/3.0pre -
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 05:15:00 PM UTC
Re: UTF-8
Yes, it's a bug. We'll look into it, thanks for reporting the problem!
Edit: Btw, this is exactly why we need your help testing the site. Keep the reports coming!
Edit 2: UTF-8 issues with comments are now fixed. Let us know if they're not.
-
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 05:57:51 PM UTC
"I agree" not working
As topic says, the function "I agree" in scorecard does not seem to work ATM. Gives a small popup about service not being available.
-
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 06:11:32 PM UTC
Comment editing not functioning
Tried to edit my comment (9down.com) in Fx 2. Pressing the Edit button didn't do a thing. Using NoScript with scripts allowed for this site. <-- Ignore this :) Seems to work now
-
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 06:34:19 PM UTC
Re: "I agree" not working
Press Ctrl+Shift+R to reload the page and try again. It's probably just someone tweaking things at our end.
-
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 06:45:20 PM UTC
"I agree" issue
That Ctrl+Shift+R seems to have solved the issue.
-
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 06:36:50 PM UTC
I want a russian language at your forum!
Why not include to a forum sections with different languages? It would be very convenient! On a Russian-speaking forum to put moderator Russian, and that badly turns out, the interface Russian, and a forum English! ? :-(
(Sorry, i now english language not good...) -
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 07:14:55 PM UTC
Artemij, it is better to
Artemij, it is better to give some time for developers to fix UTF-8 support in WOT commenting system. I think there will be russian forums too but you should wait a bit.
PS: I'm russian too.
-
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 07:34:25 PM UTC
Re: Hmm...
Yes, it should be fixed. Thanks for the confirmation though!
-
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 09:02:11 PM UTC
Scorecard comments and postcount
Small oddity: the number of my scorecard comments seem to be added to my postcount. However when accessing My posts in My Page, it only shows my entries in blog comments and forum. I don't seem to be able to see a list of my comments anywhere. Only when again viewing scorecard for some site I can see the comment for that specific site.
-
- on Tue 15 Apr 2008
- 09:29:14 PM UTC
Scorecard comments
You are right, the scorecard comments are added to the postcount in My page, but they are not shown at My posts. It's good idea to add the scorecard comments to My posts as well. Thanks for the idea.
-
- on Wed 16 Apr 2008
- 12:54:25 AM UTC
Fairly good but..
I like wot 3.0, but I think there are some things that should be changed/added
1. You can only view comments if you view the scorecard. Something showing part of the message followed by read more in the actual rating window would be helpful. For example a comment might look like this.
This site is somewhat spammy, it..... Read more
Second of all, it should be more clear what the people icons by the rating are. Putting a reliability, or number of raters, would be helpful
Another important feature i think would be to include whats on the demo page in the actual rating window, so you can check a site quickly and easily. In other words, put the same search box that's on the demo page, right under activity score, or really anywhere on the rating window.
Finally, a lighter colored rating window like before would be better. The green section indicating excellent, the red section indicating unsafe, etc are much darker than in wot 2.0, however at least a little lighter would be nice.Overall however, I like wot 3.0. The scorecard is very nice, and I'm happy to see you encorporated my suggestion that I posted: http://www.mywot.com/en/forum/98
Thanks!
Ben -
- on Wed 16 Apr 2008
- 01:40:58 AM UTC
Happy with colors?
Some will like the colors - others will not - some users are completely color blind...
Perhaps having a choice of 2 or 3 options for colors, and a choice that can be used independent of color (maybe black and white or different icons).
Each user can pick a style (locally) that suits - and almost all users will be more satisfied. Some will like dark, some bright, some alternate colors entirely.
Maybe different shades picked out by the user from a color palette for a custom mix.
-
- on Wed 16 Apr 2008
- 03:23:18 AM UTC
Colorblindness is important!
Something like 6 to 8 percent of men are red-green colorblind. The linear trust scales are probably fine, but the color-only indicator is not going to be very useful to a goodly chunk of WOT's userbase.
I'd recommend using a dial-type indicator, or a pie wedge that can go from 0 degrees to 360 degrees. It could be specified as an alternative in the settings.
-
- on Wed 16 Apr 2008
- 04:00:00 AM UTC
Re: Colorblindness is important!
We hear you and in fact, we have something very cool in the works to make both the add-on and the scorecard more accessible. I was quite impressed by the work of our design people myself and I'm not easily impressed. Unfortunately, there just wasn't enough time to include it in the v3 beta, but it's coming.
-
- on Wed 16 Apr 2008
- 04:14:00 AM UTC
Re: Fairly good but..
Thanks for the comments. The colors on the rating bar are intentionally darker in this version to focus your attention from your own rating to the community rating, because that's what most users are looking for when they open the window. As you notice, the rating bar is even darker if you have already given a rating. If you haven't rated a site and move your mouse over the rating bar, it becomes brighter. I know the colors may need some getting used to after the old version though.
-
- on Thu 17 Apr 2008
- 02:46:17 AM UTC
Colors
Still, an option allowing you to choose your brightness would be nice.
Ps: PLEASE look at this http://www.mywot.com/en/forum/1220 I posted it a second time as the first time it was completely ignored -
- on Sun 20 Apr 2008
- 02:36:02 AM UTC
WOT 3
Yes! I really like the vers. 3 WOT. The comments section makes a lot of sense.
If my rating varies from the overall rating, I should explain WHY. Also great sites should be rewarded, and dangerous ones should be explained. Some users may ignore a red circle, but if they see that the site is known for a specific problem, they may be more careful about visiting.
WOT 3 works & feels great. I have been revisiting some previously rated sites just to add a comment. I feel that it makes my ratings more relevant.
WOT 3 beta testing team
Welcome to the WOT 3 beta testing team! This is the place to discuss the new version of WOT, make suggestions and leave feedback. Thanks for being a part of this important group.