Forum
Comments:
-
- on Sat 27 Feb 2010
- 05:17:07 PM UTC
Welcome to wot
I tried to enter your site but it doesn´t work. So i can´t rate it
Blueberrycake Level Member of the WOT Community
-
- on Sat 27 Feb 2010
- 06:00:36 PM UTC
blocked by wot :))) after
blocked by wot :)))
after rating green i was able to visit.I won´t say there´s child safety so i won´t rate it green, everything else is acceptable.
Blueberrycake Level Member of the WOT Community
-
- on Sat 27 Feb 2010
- 05:55:14 PM UTC
Adult content
- Adult content means, content not suitable for young
children
It does not mean "child porn"
It's simply any material that may be pornographic in nature. - por·nog·ra·phy
(pôr-nŏg'rə-fē)
n.
1. Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.
2. The presentation or production of this material.
3. Lurid or sensational material: "Recent novels about the Holocaust have kept Hitler well offstage [so as] to avoid the ... pornography of the era" (Morris Dickstein).
And I agree, you have images of full nudity, such as in the Varanasi gallery. Some could arguably be deemed as "art" while other images may be questionable.
FYI, I offer your site high rating, but I have left an Adult comment as well. This site if viewed by young children should be done so with parental guidance to answer questions that will arise.
-------
WOT Services Ltd. - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
Thank you all
- G7W -
- on Wed 10 Mar 2010
- 10:21:18 PM UTC
Thanks (-:
Hi to all people who who read this.
Thanks for your written feedback and the many (good) votes.
Now my rates for Trustworthiness, Vendor reliability and Privacy is green (instead of red/orange like before).
Also the 2 comments which deprecated as child porn are removed.
So now I'm completely happy and want to take a bow - thanks!P.S.
Additionally I want to note, that I respect low values for the Adult section. I think it's a good thing to protect children from adult content. This was not the reason for this discussion. -
- on Sat 13 Mar 2010
- 12:05:28 PM UTC
Raded, Green, Green, Green
Raded, Green, Green, Green and Yellow.
-
- on Sat 13 Mar 2010
- 03:43:40 PM UTC
For me the fact that the
For me the fact that the last gallery (Nude in glass factory) clearly states that there is content that some may find offensive is enough for me to say ok I either will or won't look. I have rated all category Green
--
Scott Evans VK7HSE
http://www.vk7hse.hobby-site.org
PGP/GPG Key ID 437E00F9 -
- on Sun 14 Mar 2010
- 02:07:02 AM UTC
Not Great Art
Whilst the images are not High Art (I am Academically qualified to make that judgement), the site doesn't contain anything that I would describe as dangerous or overtly offensive. However, young children ought to be supervised if viewing some of the images.

My website has a bad reputation and wrong comments (child porn)
Hi,
many years ago I created a personal website to show my photos (about 500 pieces). Most are from my India travel, art or daily life.
Additionally on my website I published lyrics and the diary of my India travel. (Both in the german section only.)
This is my website:
http://www.beauty-of-darkness.de
Today I recognized that my website has very bad reputation (yellow-red-red-red).
There are 2 WOT comments. I translated them and saw that bot comments means I would offer "child porn". I never ever owned or published child porn! I hate people that like to touch childs.
I don't understand why people write such comments. Or is that a kind of spam?
A few of my photos shows nude art photography (no childs, no porn!).
This gallery "Nude in glass factory" shows a girl and a boy which age was about 25 years.
Here you can have a look:
http://www.beauty-of-darkness.de/fotos/09_akt_in_g...
I suppose because of this the Child Safety value of my website is bad.
In my eyes this is no bad content. Pictures like this are even in public magazines (without age restriction) and in public TV.
But I accept the Child Safety classification of WOT users.
The other ratings are:
Trustworthiness = 41
Vendor reliability = 36
Privacy = 34
I don't understand why this ratings are so bad.
Maybe some people had read the wrong comments about "child porn" and gave bad votes to all cathegories in revenche?
On the news page I added a form for a newsletter. But I never send even one e-mail to the people. (Because I had no time for scanning and adding more photos.)
Is this a reason for a bad vote?
Is there something wrong with my website?
Does somebody has an idea what are the reasons for the bad votes? (related to Trustworthiness, Vendor reliability and Privacy)
Is it possible to remove the wrong comments about child porn?
Feel free to check my websiste:
http://www.beauty-of-darkness.de
Note: Additionally I have a sub website on my domain.
It contains information about disco events of my student club and pictures of my self created flyer advertisement. It contains no bad and no nude content.
Look here: http://www.beauty-of-darkness.de/mld/alte_flyer.ht...