Server location is determined by the server closest to your geographical location. 
| Trustworthiness | |||
| Vendor reliability | |||
| Privacy | |||
| Child Safety |
Good site | |
Useful, informative | |
Good customer experience | |
Child friendly | |
Spam | |
Bad customer experience | |
Phishing or other scams | |
Browser exploit | |
Useless | |
Other |
| Date | Source | Category | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
11/03/2009 | Hamza-Islam | Good customer experience | This site is more trusted than WOT, i will give you an examp ... 2 This site is more trusted than WOT, i will give you an example: [ link to this comment ] |
08/22/2008 | MattLee | Useless | sorry siteadvisor has become a joke since mcafee took over. ... 27 sorry siteadvisor has become a joke since mcafee took over. its very biased. if there is a competitor they think ppl know very little about, they give the site a red rating until enough people complain. [ link to this comment ] |
08/25/2008 | BLiNdZoRz | Useless | Most of the time some dangerous or malicious site is rated g ... 24 Most of the time some dangerous or malicious site is rated green, and an unsuspecting user downloads a virus without even knowing, the good thing is that there's a lot of users, and most often a lot of comments. I would still prefer MyWot. [ link to this comment ] |
04/16/2008 | connorscomputershow | Useful, informative | |
04/15/2008 | Reprotected | Useful, informative | Can be a competition to WOT now. Now since WOT 3 Beta is rel ... 20 Can be a competition to WOT now. Just MyWOT and SpywareBlaster, I guess... Found a malicious or fraudulent website? Rate it at WOT ASAP! Found a game hacker? Report it to the game's anti-cheat team! Infected with a virus? Delete it with an antivirus =P
[ link to this comment ] |
11/06/2008 | xzing | Useless | |
01/04/2009 | Jon R | Useless | Its a nice idea (kind of like WOT) but its become utterly us ... 15 Its a nice idea (kind of like WOT) but its become utterly useless. The user reviews are full of people who know nothing. The rating system has become a popularity contest and not a way of telling a reviewers trustworthyness. Their auto-rating system is flawed, several good sites have een flagged red or yellow. Several very bad sites are green, probably due to the fact that Mcafee is terrible at catching anything. Stick with WOT it actually works. [ link to this comment ] |
09/06/2008 | DiM1319 | Useful, informative | Site Advisor by McAfee is good in adition to WOT 15 Site Advisor by McAfee is good in adition to WOT ---------------------------------------------------------------
Signatur:
Prevention is best protection...Stay safe.
/any questions? -leave a message thx\
[ link to this comment ] |
10/13/2008 | PHMan | Useless | I have used SiteAdvisor and I'm disappointed to say that it ... 14 I have used SiteAdvisor and I'm disappointed to say that it has a lot of false positives and less accurate detection (i.e. freescreensaver.com and antispyware.org). [ link to this comment ] |
09/08/2008 | adavis | Other | McAfee SiteAdvisor frequently shows malware-laden sites to b ... 14 McAfee SiteAdvisor frequently shows malware-laden sites to be clear of threats, and for some domains, ignores any negative comments from its users. That said, the SiteAdvisor Firefox extension remains a semi-useful tool with which to supplement other, better utilities. Having run both SiteAdvisor and WOT in parallel, I can say that WOT has picked up on more real threats than has SiteAdvisor. [ link to this comment ] |

xvcxv
xxxx
xvcxv
xxxx
xvcxv
xxxx
xvcxv
xxxx