Is stdcarriers.com Safe?

Suspicious website

Website security score

10%
WOT’s security score is based on our unique technology and community expert reviews.
Is this website claimed?
No
Community reviews
★ 0.6
WOT’s algorithm
12%
Child Safety
N/A

What does the community say?

Leave a review

How would you rate this website from 1 to 5?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Share your feedback and help the communityReviews must consist of at least 15 charactersChoose the tags that best describe this website
Malware or Viruses
Poor customer service
Phishing
Scam
Potentially illegal
Misleading or unethical
Privacy Risk
Suspicious
Hate, discrimination
Spam
Potential unwanted program
Ads / Pop-ups
Adult Content
Incidental nudity
Gruesome or shocking
Cancel
Post Review
0.6
half-starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star

Based on 9 reviews

Sort by:
Newest
This site is a part of a network of sites which are a part of the "slander industry" which at once hosts libel about people and makes money from its removal. See: ***** Very untrustworthy.
1
malicious domains hitting spamtraps JSS list
Helpful
This site can list you as an STD Carrier. Source: ***** See also: *****
2
Member site of the Cyrus Sullivan extortion network which solicits and publishes libelous reports about individuals with detailed personal information based on hearsay, offers to remove them including from Google for $1,000 each (there is currently a 50% "March Madness Sale"), and offers pornography and sex toys. Reference: *****
8
As explained by other WOT users, anyone can list YOU as a STD carrier without proof, and maybe even for hateful reasons.
7
Reprehensible; allows anonymous posting of private information of other people along with libelous accusations.
9
"They have even allowed false reports about children, and refused to remove." - What you don't know is that the report featuring the picture of someone with who the woman claimed to be her 9 year old son had actually been removed by the author just over a week before the taping. Shortly before leaving for the airport I spoke with a producer that mentioned the woman's first name and did quick search of the registry because it jogged my memory about her complaint, I didn't see the picture. When I got home I confirmed that although the picture was still on the file system that the report itself was not an issue when the show was taped. I probably should of said something, but I wanted the show to be as entertaining as possible. I also wanted to make the point that due to the ability of delinquents to post stuff all over the web resolving issues with the author is always best. I also wanted to stress user education over all else because people believe what they read online all too much and they should not. If people stopped believing what they read on the internet people wouldn't have to worry about lies being posted about them. I know that goal might not sound realistic, but it is the only way that free speech can thrive on the web. I now have new policy against images with third parties that appear to be young children. All such images will be removed if found on old reports and they are banned on new reports.
1
This guys websites are just plain unethical. Allows users to make extremely damaging claims against other individuals with no proof needed. *****
16
Check If You’ve Been CompromisedConnect with Google to scan your browsing history.
Connect with Google
As seen on
By signing in, you agree to data collection and use as described in our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy
alternative-placeholder

About WOT

We reviewed more than 2 Million website and counting. WOT is a lightweight extension designed to help you browse quickly and securely. It will clean your browser, speed it up, and protect your private information.

Is this your website?

Claim your website to access WOT’s business tools and connect with your customers.
Claim This Website
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalization. By continuing, you agree to our cookie policy.
Accept