General discussion

User picture

Feedback

Its a good idea to show publicly number of people that rated the site in question. Its a good idea. The more people rated, the easier it is for the visitor to determine whether or not to proceed visiting the site.

User picture

Re: Feedback

We have the confidence value for telling you the reliability of the ratings. Just look at the number of little men next to the rating symbol.

User picture

That's irrelevant to the

That's irrelevant to the quality of the ratings.

What if the rating is from one person only? If it were from 100, it would
be more sound and accurate. It would be more "fact" than one person's
opinion of the site.

User picture

Re: That's irrelevant to the

Did you read the blog posting? Since ratings can be made anonymously, the number of ratings alone doesn't tell you if the rating is "sound and accurate". In fact, it could even be misleading. That's why the confidence value not only takes into account the number of ratings, but also their reliability.

User picture

WOT rocks

WOT is super! I feel safer...

Thanks n regards

http://www.womenpix.blogspot.com

User picture

Just a warning folks

Just a warning folks ......... the links posted by deep7up is NOT child safe ......... (I've not checked it further than a quick look but strongly recommend one of the MyWOT staff delete it from the comments)

User picture

Re: deep7up

I am confident that deep7up is a spammer or spambot.

I have just rated that site as 'adult'.

It should show red-child unsafe within 1/2 hour.

Happy to help.

User picture

What if the rating is from one person only?

"What if the rating is from one person only? If it were from 100, it would
be more sound and accurate. It would be more "fact" than one person's
opinion..."

I'm sorry to disagree.

What about 'everybody's' opinion that the Earth was fixed in space,
versus one man's opinion based on scientific investigation? -
"Eppur si muove" - Galileo Galilei

:-)

Copyright Against Intuition pendiente de patente