General discussion
McAfee TrustedSource... not to trusted.
lun 21 sep 2009 09:18:50 UTC — sebsauvageI like WOT. Because people rate sites, not only stupid computers.
I see some people boo-hing WOT and praising McAfee TrustedSource/SiteAdvisor.
Truth is... I see more and more good sites with bad ratings on TrustedSource.
http://www.trustedsource.org/query/malekal.com
which is the french personal website of a guy who does a *lot* of good work regarding Windows security.
or http://www.trustedsource.org/query/sk1project.org
which is a very good vector drawing program.
mmm... I don't trust McAfee.
And you cannot have any details on the reasons of their rating.
I don't know how they rate sites. My guess is that they aggregate several sources, including DNS-BH (thus the sk1project.org misclassification).
I really prefer WOT.
This was my rambling of the day.
- Vous devez vous identifier ou créer un compte pour écrire des commentaires
Title typo
lun 21 sep 2009 10:13:48 UTC — sebsauvage"McAfee TrustedSource... not to trusted. " ---> "McAfee TrustedSource... not so trusted. "
Trusted Source is laughable
lun 21 sep 2009 10:16:26 UTC — LiVeRpUdLiAn932http://www.trustedsource.org/query/freelotto.com
Infamous spammer Freelotto spammed McAfee alot, according to their own charts, yet they rate it as Neutral.
lastmeasure, infamous shock site, Neutral
Laughable.
You'll Never Walk Alone
WOT >>>>> McAfee
lun 21 sep 2009 20:03:32 UTC — demonluoWOT >>>>> McAfee TrustedSource/SiteAdvisor - end of story -