I thought it was funny and did not take it seriously...
I found nothing malicious with the site as far as causing my AV to alarm; though I didn't stay long, I scanned through it, got a good laugh and went on my way.
There are hundreds of sites that are not serious and are not harmful.
Do you really think that they're going to eat Fuzzy?
I suppose the true test would be to go back to the site after the "deadline" and if there are images of cut up half-cooked kitty... then it would be worth rating - it would have cause.
I remember an old site was brought up 8 months or so ago (I can't remember the name now) and it had a few younger members thinking it was going to hack their PC... when it was all a joke. Maybe this site is a joke too?
-------
WOT Services Ltd. - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
Thank you all
- G7W
I pretty much agree with amishrabbit and g7w. While this may be a tremendously TWISTED joke (and I hesitate to even call it a "joke" . . . more like amishrabbit's "publicity stunt"), it still is not cause to rate red.
g7w put it well. If it turns out there are (sickening) images of a tortured/dying/mangled animal, then that might be cause to rate red, or at least mark down low for "Child Safety". Personally, if that happened I might even make a red comment on "Ethical" issues. But until then it just remains a twisted . . . publicity stunt.
This just reinforces my low opinion of social networking sites (not all, but most).
I seriously hope this is a joke and even if it isn't that the guy goes to some god-forsaken hellhole and kills himself. This is an evil thing to do and I cant understand or even begin to imagine the sickness of this guy. I hope he dies.
not much difference there IMO.
-------
WOT Services Ltd. - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
Thank you all
- G7W
this dude is seriously
Срд 04 Ноя 2009 13:52:57 — stonefistthis dude is seriously f***ed up in his head.
Rated,agreed and commented
Shocking
Срд 04 Ноя 2009 15:09:50 — XP GuardThat guy has some sanity issues.
Rated, agreed and commented.
Oh please
Птн 06 Ноя 2009 23:54:57 — amishrabbitThis is a publicity stunt. Ignored.
agreed
Сбт 07 Ноя 2009 01:32:23 — g7wHilarious...
-------
WOT Services Ltd. - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
Thank you all
- G7W
Either
Сбт 07 Ноя 2009 01:41:01 — WarxasWay, why shouldn't it be rated red?
I mean really the whole site, is threatening someone.
threaten?
Сбт 07 Ноя 2009 02:07:42 — g7wto cook a cat unless there are more tweets?
I thought it was funny and did not take it seriously...
I found nothing malicious with the site as far as causing my AV to alarm; though I didn't stay long, I scanned through it, got a good laugh and went on my way.
There are hundreds of sites that are not serious and are not harmful.
Do you really think that they're going to eat Fuzzy?
I suppose the true test would be to go back to the site after the "deadline" and if there are images of cut up half-cooked kitty... then it would be worth rating - it would have cause.
I remember an old site was brought up 8 months or so ago (I can't remember the name now) and it had a few younger members thinking it was going to hack their PC... when it was all a joke. Maybe this site is a joke too?
-------
WOT Services Ltd. - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
Thank you all
- G7W
Maybe a sick joke, but
Сбт 07 Ноя 2009 06:09:09 — BobJamI pretty much agree with amishrabbit and g7w. While this may be a tremendously TWISTED joke (and I hesitate to even call it a "joke" . . . more like amishrabbit's "publicity stunt"), it still is not cause to rate red.
g7w put it well. If it turns out there are (sickening) images of a tortured/dying/mangled animal, then that might be cause to rate red, or at least mark down low for "Child Safety". Personally, if that happened I might even make a red comment on "Ethical" issues. But until then it just remains a twisted . . . publicity stunt.
This just reinforces my low opinion of social networking sites (not all, but most).
This isn't funny. At all.
Сбт 07 Ноя 2009 07:57:08 — manictigerAlso, I already hear plenty of "Chinese people eat dogs and cats", with out this nut case reinforcing that stereotype.
I'm going to rate this as ethical issues and give it a poor child rating.
This isn't funny. At all.
Сбт 07 Ноя 2009 07:57:43 — manictigerOops. Double post, my bad.
Sick joke
Вск 08 Ноя 2009 03:58:10 — phantazmAnd not suitable for children...
Nice
Вск 08 Ноя 2009 04:31:03 — Warxasand red now. Thanks for all those have rated. Yes I too seriosuly hope it is a "joke".
Rated
Вск 08 Ноя 2009 21:19:37 — endless90Rated
I seriously hope this is a
Втр 10 Ноя 2009 17:22:59 — bonobo4I seriously hope this is a joke and even if it isn't that the guy goes to some god-forsaken hellhole and kills himself. This is an evil thing to do and I cant understand or even begin to imagine the sickness of this guy. I hope he dies.
Silver Level Member of WOT
Drastic
Втр 10 Ноя 2009 17:41:44 — BobJam"I hope he dies."
That's a little too drastic for me. Better to have him undergo root canals without numbing agents.
re: I seriously hope this is a
Втр 10 Ноя 2009 21:08:05 — g7wHe wants kitty cakes...
you want him dead...
not much difference there IMO.
-------
WOT Services Ltd. - gives us safety through Web of Trust.
WOT Community - gives us security through unity.
Thank you all
- G7W
Ok, maybe I was a little
Срд 11 Ноя 2009 20:02:20 — bonobo4Ok, maybe I was a little drastic. But at the very least imprisoned and banned from having animals for life.
Silver Level Member of WOT
Unfortunately
Срд 11 Ноя 2009 23:33:40 — BobJamSadly, we don't have enough prisons for all the morons like that that are on the Internet these days.