Information from third-party sources (0)
This site doesn't appear in third-party sources. Read more about our trusted sources.
conservapedia.com user reviews (550)
Please Register / login to leave a comment.
Comment votes have been disabled for this site.
This website is a wiki-based online encyclopedia. It is written from a conservative Christian point of view, making it somewhat biased and unreliable as a research tool.
The encyclopedia claims to be a trustworthy source of information, when some of its pages--especially those with topics pertaining to politics--are plagued with bias and inaccuracies. Also, the website includes biased, controversial, or offensive content, such as content which states that "women are weaker than men".
However, most of the pages on the encyclopedia are child friendly.
Hilarious website. Recommended, but not for research. It's more biased than "Rational"Wiki (http://rationalwiki.org/). It's a good website for learning to troll, it's a good source if you're batshit crazy, if you don't want to be laughed at then don't use this as a reputable source.
Extremely biased and misleading. Articles are either uncited or come from unscientific sources such as right-wing opinion articles and creation science websites, rather than anything even remotely peer reviewed. Most facts are cited from articles on the website "creation.com" Here are some of the absurd claims:
"Homosexuality was accepted in Nazi Germany"
"Evolutionary belief is linked to bestiality"
"Liberals typically support child pornography"
On science, it pushes a feeling of oppression rather than peer-reviewed facts; that Evolutionary Biology is only taught because science has been controlled by atheists who want to brainwash children out of their religion. It is utterly absurd.
It also doesn't even try to hide its bias. In articles, the "liberal community" is often used and is preceded by terms like "licentious" and "immoral." The article on liberals itself is filled with specific presumptions about belief on modern laws, rather than the actual definition. It's hard to tell if this website is a joke or just plain crazy.
There is absolutely no way the bad ratings for the website are simply because of "liberal bias" or "liberals oppressing free speech." Both conservatives and liberals should be opposing this because it is one of the most deceptive websites on the internet.
The only explanation I have for this website is that it's an extremist parody of conservatives beliefs. There is no logical or rational reason for anybody to visit this site besides a chuckle. No conservative I know would visit this website with a serious mindset.
This is a wiki site which contains articles written from the standpoint of the American religious right. It includes uncritical references to pseudoscience (e.g. creationism, denial of general relativity, reparative therapy, and some others), political propaganda and bigotry against homosexuals and liberals. Not recommended for anything other than a few laughs.
While it does not contain sexually explicit images, the overtly political viewpoint presented on the site may not be suitable for all children.
Conservapedia presents itself as an encyclopaedia - a conservative Christian alternative to Wikipedia - yet it's anything but. This is more a fundamentalist conservative Christian blog, masquerading as a learning resource, that can only leave children baffled.
Many people have been to the site, with the intent of contributing to an encyclopaedia, and found themselves bullied and banned by the admins. Ironically, the only way to survive is to buy in totally to the mindset of the site owner, yet try not to be as extreme as him because they often mistake this for parody.
For some good examples of their lunacy and hate, read their articles on the following subjects: Obama (emphasis on Muslim heritage and noting that "Obama claims to have been born in Hawaii"), Homosexuality (one of the longest single articles they have, and just one of many relating to the topic, which reminds us that God will damn homosexuals to Hell), evolution (explaining how evolution is wrong and it lead to Hitler).
A pot of insanity where you'll find page after page of discrimination based on belief, sexual orientation and political orientation.
You will also find ludicrous statements and contortions of basic science, such as the word "radar" is "Conservative" and calling the theory of relativity "liberal claptrap"
I'm finally able to access Conservapedia. With that opportunity, I will rate this what it deserves. (also, this website is one massive Poe's Law)
The most untrustworthy encyclopedia ever. Full of lies, lies and more lies, Just read any article and you know what i'm saying. It's a personal blog and not a informative neutral source.
My first impression was one of bemusement. Was this Poe's Law gone mad? To my dismay, as I read further, I began to realize that these people were absolutely serious. Misinformation is one thing, but the temerity to lie so shamelessly is not only appalling, it's criminal.