Is sjwiki.org Safe?

Trusted by WOT

Website security score

43%
WOT’s security score is based on our unique technology and community expert reviews.
Is this website claimed?
No
Community reviews
★ 2.5
WOT’s algorithm
50%
Child Safety
N/A

What does the community say?

Leave a review

How would you rate this website from 1 to 5?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Share your feedback and help the communityReviews must consist of at least 15 charactersChoose the tags that best describe this website
Malware or Viruses
Poor customer service
Phishing
Scam
Potentially illegal
Misleading or unethical
Privacy Risk
Suspicious
Hate, discrimination
Spam
Potential unwanted program
Ads / Pop-ups
Adult Content
Incidental nudity
Gruesome or shocking
Cancel
Post Review
2.5
starstarhalf-starempty-starempty-star

Based on 9 reviews

Sort by:
Newest
DO NOT TRUST THIS WEBSITE. FALSE-FLAG SCAMMING AHEAD. This is a false-flag operation, and is purposely misleading. They are spreading proven lies, while pretending to be a fact-based site in the style of Wikipedia (though they are entirely unaffiliated with Wikipedia). This sight is FAR-FAR-Right propaganda, pretending to be "SJWs" (Social Justice Warriors) in order to: a) Misrepresent and defame those who may be sympathetic to social justice causes, and b) To bait and exploit those who are right-of-center in order to deepen the destain some may have for left-leaning ideas. Regardless of politics, this is an entirely falsified scam-site.
Helpful
Website by dumbasses for dumbasses. That doesn't mean that I'll rate it a yellow, it's just politically biased.
1
I am rating this at 'yellow'. It's a political website, and technically safe to use (no viruses or malware) but since it's a politically motivated website, the information on here suffers from severe bias at best, and qualifies as propaganda at worst. For example, most of the information on this website seems to be based on the intersectionality theory. This theory originates in the social sciences, and is highly controversial among social scientists. However, this website fails to address the controversy and instead chooses to present the theory as fact. This is misleading, and due to the nature of the website (presented as factual information with educational value), this is an unacceptable twisting of the truth. To be clear: I am not giving this website a bad rating based on the politics behind the website, not do I have an agenda of my own. I am giving this website a bad rating because it presents controversial, unproven theories as fact, which makes it untrustworthy. I'm rating it as 'be cautious' in regards to child-friendliness, because it's a politically motivated website, and children should not be exposed to political propaganda without proper guidance by an adult. The website is not inherently dangerous, but it's not trustworthy and everything on here should be taken with a big grain of salt.
1
I'm anti-feminist and very against SJW issues, but I don't see this as good enough reason to have this site labeled as un-trustworthy, especially from a security stand point which is how I primarily use WOT. I wouldn't buy into what they're selling you, but all the same, it's not a dangerous or malicious website. Let's cool the jets on the dog-piling.
Helpful
A wiki talking about Social Justice issues. Those here and in the future who see fit to use WOT to rate a site they politically don't like, is rather alarming as they're being straight up biased and not rating a website objectively. Because I don't agree with religion, does not mean I wish to make every Christian site a yellow or red rating on WOT, only children with agendas do that, though they claim the opposite, actions speak louder than words.
1
Basically a wiki for SJW's. I mean just take a look at the Anita Sarkeesian page for it(how can anyone take her seriously), it's ridiculous.
3
wiki for social justice issues.
8
It's just a wiki about social issues. It might need to be given some scrutiny, but there's nothing offensive on there.
8
The prime example of the SJW menace. I'm not sure whether this site is trolling or serious (Poe's law at it again), but it appears to be so completely and utterly deluded that I question the sanity of its authors. Even as a independent progressive liberal libertarian, I find this to be total horseshit.
6
Check If You’ve Been CompromisedConnect with Google to scan your browsing history.
Connect with Google
As seen on
By signing in, you agree to data collection and use as described in our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy
alternative-placeholder

About WOT

We reviewed more than 2 Million website and counting. WOT is a lightweight extension designed to help you browse quickly and securely. It will clean your browser, speed it up, and protect your private information.

Is this your website?

Claim your website to access WOT’s business tools and connect with your customers.
Claim This Website
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalization. By continuing, you agree to our cookie policy.
Accept