18+
Ce site est réservé aux adultes
18+

Le site conservapedia.com est-il sûr ?

Ce site est suspect

1.6
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
(621 avis)
Je détiens ce site
Demander à notre communauté
Partager :
Partagez votre avis...
starempty-star
Mauvais
starempty-star
Correct
starempty-star
Moyen
starempty-star
Bon
starempty-star
Excellent
621 avis dans la communauté
Classer par :
Le plus récent
La protection en ligne la plus fiable
4 sept. 2009
starstarstarstarempty-star
seems that some don't like the message and rate it accordingly
Utile
1
30 août 2009
Typical liberals... If something doesn't adhere to their viewpoints, they must suppress it. So much for free speech, huh? Besides, this page is nothing but conservative tongue in cheek humor anyways.
Utile
1
27 août 2009
starstarstarstarstar
Not liking the truth doesn't make the truth wrong. The person that rails against the truth will always be wrong. 3,000 years of history is certainly more useful than ideas conjured by those that refuse to recognize they don't definitively know the truth. I will continue to look for the "lies" at the website but the only ones I have seen so far are those listed on this page where there is a red ball marking the lie.
Utile
1
25 août 2009
starstarstarstarstar
Very good and useful site. Not at all a hate site. Lots of trolls calling it hateful because they are the haters. Sad.
Utile
10
25 août 2009
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star
The site is being downrated for the content, yet it is obviously a website dedicated to the far right wing.
Utile
2
23 août 2009
starstarstarstarstar
Someone has to put Wikipedia in it's place for being so liberal biased. All I want is the truth, not filtered or politically correct. A good example of bias is how we can no longer vote on this page.
Utile
1
20 août 2009
starstarhalf-starempty-starempty-star
This site has a lot of problems but it doesn't deserve a red rating. I would prefer to see red reserved for malware, phishing, and scam sites. If one is into unintentional irony, this site is hilarious.
Utile
1
19 août 2009
starstarstarstarhalf-star
Why are they giving this site poor ratings and bad comments? This is definitely like Uncyclopedia. It's a joke. They all need to think it over before they rate this site as hate. There is no hate or spam on this site. This site is not phishy.
Utile
3
6 août 2009
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
essentially a right wing conspiracy site. You have to be an absolute moron to believe that Obama wasn't born in the US, these nuts simply won't face reality that his birth has been proved over and over again.
Utile
29 juil. 2009
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Typical hate site, spewing religious propaganda and obscurantism, Taliban-style. You need an answer? Open the Bible. Yeah, right...
Utile
2
29 juil. 2009
This is an anti-hate site, but many people with differing opinions will inevitably find its factual information offensive. There is nothing wrong with the site when it comes to security, trustworthiness, or child safety, and yet people continually spam rate the site to give it a bad reputation. This site reminds me of Obama, it's not evil, but it seems different so ignorant people discriminate and hate it. There is a need for sincere and honest efforts such as this in cyberspace.
Utile
2
25 juil. 2009
starstarstarstarstar
lets enact the fairness doctrine to rid ourselves of this hate site...oh and free speech...and everything that doesn't agree with the left
Utile
24 juil. 2009
starstarstarstarstar
Is a careful and extensive collection of referenced material. Obviously brings vicious comments from extreme leftists.
Utile
10
12 juil. 2009
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Untrustworthy, homophobic, religiously and ideologically blinded hate site.
Utile
1
8 juil. 2009
Filled with hateful content. Keep the kids away from this one.
Utile
1
4 juil. 2009
starstarstarstarstar
Been going to this site for years, no problems. Some people are just intolerant.
Utile
27
4 juil. 2009
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Hateful
Utile
1
26 juin 2009
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Horribly bias.
Utile
24 juin 2009
starstarstarstarstar
The site is fine. Negative ratings are politically motivated. Such will destroy WOT credibility as a "protection" technology.
Utile
1
12 juin 2009
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
This site not only lies on nearly all subjects that they disagree with, but actively glorify subjects they agree to be right. This page was written only for christian super right wing conservatives.
Utile
1
«
282930
...
32
»

À propos de ce site

Indice de Confiance
32
/100
Sécurité pour les Enfants
35
/100
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy
Accept