For all of you who complains about this site well I think better think twice. If this is a hoax how come until now all of your negative feedback's are here? the fact that they gave you an option to comment meaning aside from the score you give you can justify or reinforce your given score.
WOT works the same way Scamadviser works they both sell us. They both sell all the combined information around the world simple as that.
website ini untuk mengetahui bahwa situs itu menipu atau tidak. Jadi tidak ada alasan untuk menilai buruk situs ini. Justru situs ini cukup membantu para net surfer agar tidak tertipu oleh website scam.
I find their results highly unreliable. Many counterfeit sites are rated as 'trustworthy'. I saw a "very safe" rating for http://www.scamadviser.com/check-website/factorypriceelectronic.com
factorypriceelectronic.com is clearly an electronics scam!
scamadviser.com isn't useless - it's dangerous if people trust their results.
I can find nothing wrong with the current incarnation of ScamAdvisor.com to justify the negative comments and complaints here at WOT.
After investigating many of the negative comments here, it turns out that the complaints that refer to ScamAdvisor.com as being an UK company (or otherwise operates or "appears" to operate there) are no longer accurate. If you run a WhoIs search now (as of 12-Feb-2013), it clearly shows that ScamAdvisor.com is based in Dallas, Texas, USA. (A probable explanation for the confusion of where the company is actually located is that ONLY the site's DOMAIN name is registered at "www.123-reg.co.uk", while the company is actually located in Texas).
The commenter "leofelix" writes of some spammer who happened to have the WOT username of "Scamadvisor", but I can see no evidence that that WOT user was actually officially associated with ScamAdvisor.com, but even if so, that probably would have been the UK-based operation rather than the Texas incarnation.
Commenter "rybird" complains about having to use a Facebook login to add comments, but -- sadly, very sadly! -- that's quite ubiquitous these days, and is no reflection on ScamAdvisor and has nothing to do with phishing attempts.
Furthermore, contrary to the experience of commenter "smackers", I was searching for complaints about a site that I suspect might possibly have had ethical issues, but ScamAdvisor says is 100% safe and reliable -- exactly what WOT and other ratings sites report.
If I were as suspicious as some of the negative commentators here perhaps seem to be, I'd wonder if perhaps it isn't WOT or WOT users who have tried to interfere with ScamAdvisor's business rather than the reverse. However, I'm not that suspicious, and I do not believe that.
I'm certainly open to new evidence, but it very much seems to me that the current Texas-based ScamAdvisor is legitimate, trustworthy, and safe.
Useful tool in weeding out possible fraudulent and less than trustworthy sites. All results should be combined with human judgement and cross checks with other widely available resources to check out a site.