18+
Este site é para maiores de 18
18+

conservapedia.com é seguro?

Este site é suspeito

1.6
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
(621 Avaliações)
Reivindicar este site
Pergunte à nossa comunidade
Compartilhar:
Compartilhe seus pensamentos...
starempty-star
Medíocre
starempty-star
Razoável
starempty-star
Mediano
starempty-star
Bom
starempty-star
Excelente
621 Avaliações da comunidade
Ordenar por:
Recentes
A proteção online mais confiável
Sep 5, 2012
starstarstarstarstar
This, along with MANY conservative sites come up as dangerous on WOT.... clearly, people are pushing a liberal agenda. This site is not dangerous in any way, and MANY other conservative sites show up as the same... so, for the sake of WOT not being accused of pushing a liberal agenda.
Útil
Sep 5, 2012
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Absolute nonsense and fundamentalist Christian crap. If Jesus came back He would slap the p-ss out of these morons.
Útil
Sep 3, 2012
starstarstarstarstar
It is still sad for me to see Liberals using slander against people who do not see things as they do. This is typical of the tyrants on the left who seek to curtail free speech of opposing views.
Útil
Sep 2, 2012
starstarstarstarhalf-star
This is a good, safe site who's rating is tainted by a filthy hatred from liberals. Because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't make them dangerous. Trackers? None. Viruses? None. Biased viewpoint? Yes, as is allowed in any civilized country. Don't like it? Then get the heck out of America and go back to your Sharia country.
Útil
Aug 30, 2012
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Obviously it would be unfitting to give the website a bad review because it has a different point of view. However, as it poses as a legitimate encyclopedia, it may trick children into their views and thus deserving of a negative review.
Útil
Aug 27, 2012
Massive amount of misinformation and outright lies.
Útil
Aug 20, 2012
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
This site gives false information. Extremely contradictory to real science. Only good if you are Religious nutjob.
Útil
Aug 18, 2012
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
This "trustworthy encyclopedia" is telling nothing but nonsense, racism and hate. The "arguments" are hilarious, e.g. in the article about the theory of relativity they try to convince the reader that the "Jew Einstein" was totally wrong with his theories and they draw a bizarre connection between relativity, which is a fact of physics, with liberal politics in the United States.
Útil
Aug 17, 2012
starstarstarstarstar
Geez. Even if you don;t agree, it's another point of view. What happened to everybody being able to share their opinions?
Útil
Aug 15, 2012
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Largely nonsensical, biased, and misleading piece of sh** that can be constituted as misinformation to the highest degree attainable.
Útil
Aug 13, 2012
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
It's fun to read. The Stephen Colbert of wikis.
Útil
Aug 8, 2012
starstarstarstarhalf-star
Only those with intolerance of other points of view would rate this site bad. Therefore I rate it as good.
Útil
Aug 6, 2012
starstarstarstarhalf-star
Poor ratings for this site are not deserved just because you do not agree.
Útil
Aug 2, 2012
starstarstarstarstar
This site is fine. Just because you don't agree with someone doesn't make the information or website bad. Shame on people giving poor ratings as a form of censorship. While I may not agree with every point of view that does not mean the information is bogus. LOL @ the person in these comments refering to Wikipedia as a "reliable" source. You can't be serious.
Útil
Jul 31, 2012
starstarstarstarstar
It's silly to bash a site that you simply do not agree with... it is not a bad site... just extremely conservative.
Útil
Jul 13, 2012
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Conspiracy theories, wanton disregard of fact, provides direct impetus to the hatred of several groups of people.
Útil
Jul 11, 2012
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
This is not a question of whether we like it or not or disagree with opinions, this is about the fact that it is a site masquerading LIES and propaganda as FACTS. Blatantly spreading misinformation and misleading content and misconstrued stories, often with most of the ACTUAL information left out to make others look bad or to make themselves look GOOD. I recommend getting your information from a reputable site or getting news and information from sites in a different country, such as BBC news, as they will not be biased. It is never good to get information from a biased source, no matter what or who the bias is for. Spreading racist, hateful, bigoted and class discrimination content and lies is unethical and it is NOT American in any way, shape or form. Do your research on the facts of this country. Read about our forefathers, read the ACTUAL constitution WITHOUT commentary. Don't interpret it in any way, just read it for what it ACTUALLY IS. There are no grey areas there. It is all simple and laid out clearly enough for even a little kid to understand. Just because you don't LIKE things the way they are or LIKE certain people, does not mean you have the RIGHT to make laws based on that, discriminate against others, or say that it is YOUR right to discriminate against others or keep them down, OR that it is American, because America is about freedom, right? Freedom means everyone is free to be who they are, regardless of whether or not YOU like it. If they are not hurting you or anyone else (and I don't mean hurting your precious ideals and your homophobic views, or hurting your sensitive little mind because you find what they do to be gross or annoying. You are letting those things affect you, it is not these people affecting you, because they don't even care about you or what you think, they don't even know you exist. You are the one focusing on it/them and making it a big deal. Not them. Your ideals are YOUR ideals. Not everyone has to live by them. We ALL have the right to be free to be who we are and you do NOT have the right to keep anyone from being who they are.) then they should be free to do whatever they want with their lives and their bodies. In the end it's as simple as this: It's NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS. Stop making it!
Útil
Jun 27, 2012
starstarstarstarstar
WOT really needs to delete biased, political views from tainting ratings. All of the f-tard liberals mark this site with a poor rating because they disagree with its political viewpoints. Time to grow a pair WOT and find a way to deal with this inaccurate rating system. WOT was supposed to be used to collectively rate sites for browsing safety, from "child safety" to "no malware/phishing/scams". But it has turned into a cesspool of collectively bullying.
Útil
Jun 23, 2012
starstarstarstarstar
The poor ratings are politically motivated and dishonest. There is nothing wrong with Conservapedia.
Útil
Jun 20, 2012
starstarstarstarstar
Most people commenting here don't realize that it is a satirical humor site making fun of conservatives. It links from "Uncylopedia, the content free encyclopedia".
Útil
«
131415
...
32
»

Sobre este site

Confiabilidade
32
/100
Segurança da Criança
35
/100
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy
Accept