18+
Сайт для лиц 18 лет и старше
18+

Безопасен ли conservapedia.com?

Это подозрительный сайт

1.6
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
(621 отзывов)
Заявить права на сайт
Задать вопрос сообществу
Поделиться:
Поделитесь своим мнением...
starempty-star
Плохо
starempty-star
Нормально
starempty-star
Средне
starempty-star
Хорошо
starempty-star
Отлично
621 отзывов
Сортировать по:
Новые
Самая надежная онлайн-защита
21 янв. 2009 г.
starstarstarstarstar
The liberal editors of Wikipedia are giving Conservapedia bad reviews because it points out their own political bias. Look at what they are showing on the "Examples of Bias in Wikipedia". It is only the truth. While they give Wikipedia good votes and Conservapedia bad votes, they are only throwing mud against the truth. They can't fight the message of truth so they attack the messenger that exposes them for the fraud that they are!
Полезный
8
9 янв. 2009 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
complete rubbish. this website is so biased it must be a sick joke!
Полезный
8
8 дек. 2008 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
I just the article on Barack Obama, and it's just mudslinging him.
Полезный
8
7 дек. 2008 г.
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star
I would say Entertaining, but that would mean the site is good. >_> I give it an Ed "Poor" rating.
Полезный
13
4 дек. 2008 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Factually inaccurate and extremely biased.
Полезный
12
11 нояб. 2008 г.
I don't get why there are so many bad reviews, this is obviously a "mockapedia" like Encyclopaedia Dramatica and Uncyclopedia. It is a joke, why so serious?
Полезный
4
2 нояб. 2008 г.
starstarhalf-starempty-starempty-star
Hateful content in this case. How dare it call itself an encyclopedia?! It is extraordinarily biased! Did you know they actually threaten *jail* time for vandalism?
Полезный
13
31 окт. 2008 г.
starstarstarempty-starempty-star
Seriously, why bash this site and give it bad ratings? It's a conservative version of Wikipedia and it makes no bones about it's political leanings. Why is it unsafe? I'm not an American style Ultra-Christian conservative by any means, but that doesn't give me a reason to downrate the site. I've recently rated this site, but of the 4 metrics on the scorecard the only one I've given it a dim view on was Trustworthiness, where I gave it a Yellow mark because of its extreme editorial slant. Then again, anyone who comes here knows what they will be getting.
Полезный
7
29 окт. 2008 г.
starstarhalf-starempty-starempty-star
Bad site.
Полезный
16
20 окт. 2008 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
False information, defamatory content, misleading articles, unverifiable rubbish presented as facts. Steer clear, people. Make sure your kids never come near this site.
Полезный
41
19 окт. 2008 г.
starstarhalf-starempty-starempty-star
A site so hopelessly biased that I can't think of any meaningful use for it. I only have it bookmarked because it's frequently so bad it's funny.
Полезный
32
17 окт. 2008 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
This site is so funny on one hand, scary on the other. so many articles are just full of false information or leads so much out. Read the article on the moon for a good example. Kids shouldn't be allowed to access this site, don't want to screw them up
Полезный
26
26 сент. 2008 г.
starstarstarempty-starempty-star
Great site for the truths.
Полезный
11
26 сент. 2008 г.
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star
DELIBERATELY MISLEADING
Полезный
30
23 сент. 2008 г.
starstarstarstarstar
Dittos Vradic; Conservapedia is an online repository of information that is written and supported by individuals with a conservative viewpoint. It does not contain entries that are hate-filled, vulgar, pornographic or offensive, unlike its liberal counterpart Wikipedia. Funny...I wonder if the ones that "champion" free speech are the ones that use WOT to take that away from others, specifically the ones that exercise free speech in Conservapedia ...
Полезный
13
22 сент. 2008 г.
starstarstarstarstar
Very informative site. Being rooted in conservatism, it seems to have come under attack by liberals who believe everything is right, except saying some things are wrong; which liberals call "hate speech". If WOT lets these false allegations stand, then it will become a pretty much useless tool. I've been using Conservapedia for quite some time and have never seen any "hate speech", nor violent or illegal content, nor lies. It's just become a target for homosexual activists and other extreme liberals to attack.
Полезный
12
22 сент. 2008 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
An incredibly biased view on things here. All homosexuals/witches/anyone having a religion that isn't Christianity is automatically evil, according to this site.
Полезный
39
22 сент. 2008 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Contains numerous articles filled with hate speech.
Полезный
54
13 сент. 2008 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Just spreading hate ....
Полезный
51
20 авг. 2008 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Total joke, "trustworthy"? Too many lies and half-truths,
Полезный
45
«
303132
»

О сайте

Благонадёжность
32
/100
безопасность для детей
35
/100
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy
Accept