The liberal editors of Wikipedia are giving Conservapedia bad reviews because it points out their own political bias.
Look at what they are showing on the "Examples of Bias in Wikipedia". It is only the truth. While they give Wikipedia good votes and Conservapedia bad votes, they are only throwing mud against the truth. They can't fight the message of truth so they attack the messenger that exposes them for the fraud that they are!
Seriously, why bash this site and give it bad ratings?
It's a conservative version of Wikipedia and it makes no bones about it's political leanings. Why is it unsafe? I'm not an American style Ultra-Christian conservative by any means, but that doesn't give me a reason to downrate the site.
I've recently rated this site, but of the 4 metrics on the scorecard the only one I've given it a dim view on was Trustworthiness, where I gave it a Yellow mark because of its extreme editorial slant.
Then again, anyone who comes here knows what they will be getting.
This site is so funny on one hand, scary on the other. so many articles are just full of false information or leads so much out. Read the article on the moon for a good example. Kids shouldn't be allowed to access this site, don't want to screw them up
Dittos Vradic; Conservapedia is an online repository of information that is written and supported by individuals with a conservative viewpoint. It does not contain entries that are hate-filled, vulgar, pornographic or offensive, unlike its liberal counterpart Wikipedia. Funny...I wonder if the ones that "champion" free speech are the ones that use WOT to take that away from others, specifically the ones that exercise free speech in Conservapedia ...
Very informative site.
Being rooted in conservatism, it seems to have come under attack by liberals who believe everything is right, except saying some things are wrong; which liberals call "hate speech".
If WOT lets these false allegations stand, then it will become a pretty much useless tool.
I've been using Conservapedia for quite some time and have never seen any "hate speech", nor violent or illegal content, nor lies. It's just become a target for homosexual activists and other extreme liberals to attack.