Безопасен ли wikipedia.org?

По оценкам WOT этот сайт безопасен

4.7
starstarstarstarhalf-star
(624 отзывов)
Хороший сайт
Мнения, религия, политика
Альтернативная или нетрадиционная медицина
Другое
Популярные
Заявить права на сайт
Задать вопрос сообществу
Поделиться:
Поделитесь своим мнением...
starempty-star
Плохо
starempty-star
Нормально
starempty-star
Средне
starempty-star
Хорошо
starempty-star
Отлично
624 отзывов
Сортировать по:
Новые
Самая надежная онлайн-защита
8 апр. 2009 г.
starstarstarstarhalf-star
Unrestricted access to adult oriented contents
Полезный
9
6 апр. 2009 г.
starstarstarstarstar
good site
Полезный
8
31 мар. 2009 г.
starstarstarstarhalf-star
Great place for info, but don't their word on everything.
Полезный
8
29 мар. 2009 г.
starstarstarstarstar
Nützlich wenn man weiß was man damit anstellt.
Полезный
8
23 мар. 2009 г.
starstarstarempty-starempty-star
Be careful about what is read on this site. A large majority of what is written on the site may not be true, so it's best to be cautious.
Полезный
14
22 мар. 2009 г.
starstarstarstarstar
There is no censorship, so articles like, vagina, penis, pornography, etc... May have adult content, and there are no warnings.
Полезный
12
21 мар. 2009 г.
Useful, expansive information, though at times not always correct. Any factual errors or bias is usually resolved quickly, and little "warning" tags are given to let you know if it is believed to not have a neutral stance, etc. Despite this, usually not suitable for citing school papers and the likes.
Полезный
8
17 мар. 2009 г.
starstarstarstarhalf-star
Provides almost all information one can get from the internet.
Полезный
13
11 мар. 2009 г.
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star
Very good for providing overall general subject information but should always be cross checked with other sources for accuracy and note taken of areas where citation is not provided.
Полезный
9
3 мар. 2009 г.
starstarstarstarstar
false facts, NOT user friendly, useless, anoying, <??use Encarta instead??>
Полезный
4
28 февр. 2009 г.
starstarstarstarstar
index page of the most encyclopedia in the world
Полезный
9
24 февр. 2009 г.
starstarstarstarhalf-star
unrestricted access to adult matters.
Полезный
9
22 февр. 2009 г.
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star
This website is now run by "hobbyists" who delete information that is not in-line with their personal, and for the most part, very bias views. Wikipedia is NOT a source of reliable information.
Полезный
4
21 февр. 2009 г.
starstarstarstarstar
It has a vast structure of articles that can be helpful for school, homework and even university; however, it is not a one-hundred-percent, reliable site.
Полезный
13
20 февр. 2009 г.
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star
Lots of misinformation and lots of adult content (text and images) with no censorship or warning. Easily 'trolled'.
Полезный
2
15 февр. 2009 г.
starstarhalf-starempty-starempty-star
too much bad information, inappropriate references
Полезный
10
14 февр. 2009 г.
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star
Wikipedia is not censored so if a child types blowjob on wiki, he'll probably see some explicit pictures.
Полезный
11
13 февр. 2009 г.
starstarstarstarhalf-star
best encyclopedia and its free. written and controlled by everyone. includes almost everything.
Полезный
10
13 февр. 2009 г.
I think that many people see Wikipedia as this encyclopedia that anyone can edit, which would make it unreliable as a source of information. This is not the case. Most articles have a detailed section showing references and citations used in the creation of the article.
Полезный
9
13 февр. 2009 г.
starstarstarstarhalf-star
best place to see things that will come out in the future
Полезный
12
«
282930
...
32
»

О сайте

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.

Благонадёжность
94
/100
безопасность для детей
94
/100
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy
Accept