https://www.mywot.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=AGT+%28Gustar%29 2026-05-01T15:54:21Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.31.1 https://www.mywot.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Activity_scores&diff=16021 2015-06-01T20:12:05Z

<p>AGT (Gustar): /* = */</p> <hr /> <div>Should there really be adverts on this page?<br /> <br /> == Wot a pay site? I DON'T THINK SO! ==<br /> <br /> Why is it I'm seeing so many reviews with people writing that Wot is charging a fee now, monthly or otherwise? I have never been asked to pay a fee for Wot and WOT is a great site that needs people to know it's FREE!<br /> <br /> ____<br /> <br /> I agree with above<br /> <br /> AGT<br /> <br /> <br /> ===<br /> Possible another point of discussion:<br /> <br /> - it seems (to me) the amount of given (re)views (with at least one comment?) is more important, reliable then the quality probably of view. With other words, a WOT-viewer with more then 1.500 given (or more) reviews is more reliable then a WOT-viewer, with less then 1.500 given reviews. I'm not 100% complete sure about my -own- statement. So its probably a discussion worth? What counts more quality of reviews or quantity of reviews, what is the best mix?<br /> - the comments and this complete site is atm of writing this post, so seems it to me, more for only english understanding and reading surfers. However a lot of site's has their own language and with translating/ translated site's, the interpretation of words/frases could be very otherwise mented/intented for certain groups of visitors. Reviewers should be aware of the intentions of the makers, who are more volunteers, then quick-money-earners. This site is now only available for 2 languages. Instead of asking cash for their own reviews, it could be more wise to participate in translating this (WOT-)site to other languages??<br /> <br /> With kind regards,<br /> A.G. Terpstra<br /> <br /> p/s<br /> I'm a Dutch visitor, so probably my english isn't excactly what you think/expect it should be. My apologises for how I express myself in a not my own, native, language, ... .</div>

AGT (Gustar) https://www.mywot.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Activity_scores&diff=16017 2015-06-01T20:11:25Z

<p>AGT (Gustar): /* = */</p> <hr /> <div>Should there really be adverts on this page?<br /> <br /> == Wot a pay site? I DON'T THINK SO! ==<br /> <br /> Why is it I'm seeing so many reviews with people writing that Wot is charging a fee now, monthly or otherwise? I have never been asked to pay a fee for Wot and WOT is a great site that needs people to know it's FREE!<br /> <br /> ____<br /> <br /> I agree with above<br /> <br /> AGT<br /> <br /> <br /> ===<br /> Possible another point of discussion:<br /> <br /> - it seems (to me) the amount of given (re)views (with at least one comment?) is more important, reliable then the quality probably of view. With other words, a WOT-viewer with more then 1.500 given (or more) reviews is more reliable then a WOT-viewer, with less then 1.500 given reviews. I'm not 100% complete sure about my -own- statement. So its probably a discussion worth? What counts more quality of reviews or quantity of reviews, what is the best mix?<br /> - the comments and this complete site is atm of writing this post, so seems it to me, more for only english understanding and reading surfers. However a lot of site's has their own language and with translating/ translated site's, the interpretation of words/frases could be very otherwise mented/intented for certain groups of visitors. Reviewers should be aware of the intentions of the makers, who are more volunteers, then quick-money-earners. This site is now only available for 2 languages. Instead of asking cash for their own reviews, it could be more wise to participate in translating this (WOT-)site to other languages??<br /> <br /> With kind regards,<br /> A.G. Terpstra<br /> <br /> p/s<br /> I'm a Dutch visitor, so probably my english isn't excactly what you think it should be. my apologises for how I express myself in a not my own, native, language, ... .</div>

AGT (Gustar) https://www.mywot.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Activity_scores&diff=16013 2015-06-01T20:08:12Z

<p>AGT (Gustar): /* Wot a pay site? I DON'T THINK SO! */</p> <hr /> <div>Should there really be adverts on this page?<br /> <br /> == Wot a pay site? I DON'T THINK SO! ==<br /> <br /> Why is it I'm seeing so many reviews with people writing that Wot is charging a fee now, monthly or otherwise? I have never been asked to pay a fee for Wot and WOT is a great site that needs people to know it's FREE!<br /> <br /> ____<br /> <br /> I agree with above<br /> <br /> AGT<br /> <br /> <br /> ===<br /> Possible another point of discussion:<br /> <br /> - it seems (to me) the amount of given (re)views (with at least one comment?) is more important, reliable then the quality probably of view. With other words, a WOT-viewer with more then 1.500 given (or more) reviews is more reliable then a WOT-viewer, with less then 1.500 given reviews. I'm not 100% complete sure about my -own- statement. So its probably a discussion worth? What counts more quality of reviews or quantity of reviews, what is the best mix?<br /> - the comments and this complete site is atm of writing this post, so seems it to me, more for only english understanding and reading surfers. However a lot of site's has their own language and with translating/ translated site's, the interpretation of words/frases could be very otherwise mented/intented for certain groups of visitors. Reviewers should be aware of the intentions of the makers, who are more volunteers, then quick-money-earners. This site is now only available for 2 languages. Instead of asking cash for their own reviews, it could be more wise to participate in translating this (WOT-)site to other languages??<br /> <br /> With kind regards,<br /> A.G. Terpstra</div>

AGT (Gustar)