Rating reliability - Revision history

ScamKiller73 at 20:13, 28 October 2016

2016-10-28T20:13:49Z

Kukarekukukarekukukareku at 20:08, 28 October 2016

2016-10-28T20:08:14Z

BFeely: Revert major vandalism

2015-04-12T15:36:16Z

Revert major vandalism

Superlol103: Replaced content with "god"

2015-04-12T14:57:17Z

Replaced content with "god"

Myxt: Undo vandalism 13493 by Egor-kak-tebe (talk)

2014-06-22T17:49:05Z

Undo vandalism 13493 by Egor-kak-tebe (talk)

Egor-kak-tebe: Undo revision 12821 by Jesant13 (talk)

2014-06-22T05:38:51Z

Undo revision 12821 by Jesant13 (talk)

Jesant13: I added a period.

2014-03-08T05:33:43Z

I added a period.

Jesant13: I added three missing periods.

2013-01-13T17:37:28Z

I added three missing periods.

G7w at 20:11, 24 March 2012

2012-03-24T20:11:01Z

G7w at 02:36, 25 July 2011

2011-07-25T02:36:24Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+Many times people associate a user level, as represented by their [[Activity scores|activity score]], with a user's reputation, also known as their ''rating reliability''.
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+The rating reliability is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_hypothesis_testing computed estimate] based upon demonstrated talent and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ability ability], aka: [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/merit merit].
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+Basically, the system analyzes each user's rating behavior from several aspects in order to determine their reliability. When you start using WOT, your ratings have little [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight_function weight], but if you keep rating sites consistently, your ratings will be considered more reliable over time, re: [[FAQ#Ratings aren't equally reliable|ratings aren't equally reliable]].
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+For a simple explanation, read the blog post: [http://www.mywot.com/en/blog/differing-opinions Differing opinions] paying attention to ''Personal reputation''.
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+* I can see my activity score but where is my rating reliability score?
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+<blockquote>The reliability estimates aren't public to make gaming the system more difficult and to encourage everyone to rate honestly. Also, even though the estimates are automated and perfectly objective, I'm sure some users would take them personally and publishing them would create all kinds of unwanted friction in the community. I don't think anyone wants that.
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+<br />
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+- Sami ''18 January, 2010'' [http://www.mywot.com/forum/5322-an-individuals-rating-rookie-bronze-silver-gold-platnium?comment=26320#comment-26320 forum entry]</blockquote>
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+Some curious facts about rating reliability: [http://www.mywot.com/forum/21548-wot-is-a-dictatorship?comment=133164#comment-133164 cite].
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+* Most users whose ratings are considered highly reliable are not very active. You won't meet them at the forum and they don't rate unusually many sites.
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+* Since reliability estimates are not revealed to anyone, trying to game the system becomes more difficult. Most trusted users have no idea their ratings are more trusted than someone else's. If you don't know you have power, you also have no incentive to abuse it.
-Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+* Reliability estimates are not binary values that are either on or off. They are composed of several components, which are all combined in to a single value from 0-100 separately for each rating component. This means that your child safety rating may have a different weight than the ratings in other components, for example.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Many times people associate a user level, as represented by their [[Activity scores|activity score]], with a user's reputation, also known as their ''rating reliability''.
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
-The rating reliability is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_hypothesis_testing computed estimate] based upon demonstrated talent and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ability ability], aka: [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/merit merit].
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
-Basically, the system analyzes each user's rating behavior from several aspects in order to determine their reliability. When you start using WOT, your ratings have little [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight_function weight], but if you keep rating sites consistently, your ratings will be considered more reliable over time, re: [[FAQ#Ratings aren't equally reliable|ratings aren't equally reliable]].
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
-For a simple explanation, read the blog post: [http://www.mywot.com/en/blog/differing-opinions Differing opinions] paying attention to ''Personal reputation''.
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
-* I can see my activity score but where is my rating reliability score?
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
-<blockquote>The reliability estimates aren't public to make gaming the system more difficult and to encourage everyone to rate honestly. Also, even though the estimates are automated and perfectly objective, I'm sure some users would take them personally and publishing them would create all kinds of unwanted friction in the community. I don't think anyone wants that.
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
-<br />
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
-- Sami ''18 January, 2010'' [http://www.mywot.com/forum/5322-an-individuals-rating-rookie-bronze-silver-gold-platnium?comment=26320#comment-26320 forum entry]</blockquote>
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
-Some curious facts about rating reliability: [http://www.mywot.com/forum/21548-wot-is-a-dictatorship?comment=133164#comment-133164 cite].
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
-* Most users whose ratings are considered highly reliable are not very active. You won't meet them at the forum and they don't rate unusually many sites.
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
-* Since reliability estimates are not revealed to anyone, trying to game the system becomes more difficult. Most trusted users have no idea their ratings are more trusted than someone else's. If you don't know you have power, you also have no incentive to abuse it.
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС
-* Reliability estimates are not binary values that are either on or off. They are composed of several components, which are all combined in to a single value from 0-100 separately for each rating component. This means that your child safety rating may have a different weight than the ratings in other components, for example.
+Nick Vini ПИДАРАС

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:36, 12 April 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~god~~	+	Many times people associate a user level, as represented by their [[Activity scores\|activity score]], with a user's reputation, also known as their ''rating reliability''.
		+
		+	The rating reliability is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_hypothesis_testing computed estimate] based upon demonstrated talent and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ability ability], aka: [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/merit merit].
		+
		+	Basically, the system analyzes each user's rating behavior from several aspects in order to determine their reliability. When you start using WOT, your ratings have little [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight_function weight], but if you keep rating sites consistently, your ratings will be considered more reliable over time, re: [[FAQ#Ratings aren't equally reliable\|ratings aren't equally reliable]].
		+
		+	For a simple explanation, read the blog post: [http://www.mywot.com/en/blog/differing-opinions Differing opinions] paying attention to ''Personal reputation''.
		+
		+	* I can see my activity score but where is my rating reliability score?
		+	<blockquote>The reliability estimates aren't public to make gaming the system more difficult and to encourage everyone to rate honestly. Also, even though the estimates are automated and perfectly objective, I'm sure some users would take them personally and publishing them would create all kinds of unwanted friction in the community. I don't think anyone wants that.
		+	<br />
		+	- Sami ''18 January, 2010'' [http://www.mywot.com/forum/5322-an-individuals-rating-rookie-bronze-silver-gold-platnium?comment=26320#comment-26320 forum entry]</blockquote>
		+
		+	Some curious facts about rating reliability: [http://www.mywot.com/forum/21548-wot-is-a-dictatorship?comment=133164#comment-133164 cite].
		+	* Most users whose ratings are considered highly reliable are not very active. You won't meet them at the forum and they don't rate unusually many sites.
		+	* Since reliability estimates are not revealed to anyone, trying to game the system becomes more difficult. Most trusted users have no idea their ratings are more trusted than someone else's. If you don't know you have power, you also have no incentive to abuse it.
		+	* Reliability estimates are not binary values that are either on or off. They are composed of several components, which are all combined in to a single value from 0-100 separately for each rating component. This means that your child safety rating may have a different weight than the ratings in other components, for example.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 12 April 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~Many times people associate a user level, as represented by their [[Activity scores\|activity score]], with a user's reputation, also known as their ''rating reliability''.~~	+	god
−
−	The rating reliability is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_hypothesis_testing computed estimate] based upon demonstrated talent and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ability ability], aka: [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/merit merit].
−
−	Basically, the system analyzes each user's rating behavior from several aspects in order to determine their reliability. When you start using WOT, your ratings have little [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight_function weight], but if you keep rating sites consistently, your ratings will be considered more reliable over time, re: [[FAQ#Ratings aren't equally reliable\|ratings aren't equally reliable]].
−
−	~~For a simple explanation, read the blog post: [http://www.mywot.com/en/blog/differing-opinions Differing opinions] paying attention to ''Personal reputation''.~~
−
−	* I can see my activity score but where is my rating reliability score?
−	<blockquote>The reliability estimates aren't public to make gaming the system more difficult and to encourage everyone to rate honestly. Also, even though the estimates are automated and perfectly objective, I'm sure some users would take them personally and publishing them would create all kinds of unwanted friction in the community. I don't think anyone wants that.
−	~~<br />~~
−	~~- Sami ''18 January, 2010'' [http://www.mywot.com/forum/5322-an-individuals-rating-rookie-bronze-silver-gold-platnium?comment=26320#comment-26320 forum entry]</blockquote>~~
−
−	~~Some curious facts about rating reliability: [http://www.mywot.com/forum/21548-wot-is-a-dictatorship?comment=133164#comment-133164 cite].~~
−	* Most users whose ratings are considered highly reliable are not very active. You won't meet them at the forum and they don't rate unusually many sites.
−	* Since reliability estimates are not revealed to anyone, trying to game the system becomes more difficult. Most trusted users have no idea their ratings are more trusted than someone else's. If you don't know you have power, you also have no incentive to abuse it.
−	* Reliability estimates are not binary values that are either on or off. They are composed of several components, which are all combined in to a single value from 0-100 separately for each rating component. This means that your child safety rating may have a different weight than the ratings in other components, for example.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
---[[User:Egor-kak-tebe|Egor-kak-tebe]] ([[User talk:Egor-kak-tebe|talk]]) 05:38, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Many times people associate a user level, as represented by their [[Activity scores|activity score]], with a user's reputation, also known as their ''rating reliability''.
+Many times people associate a user level, as represented by their [[Activity scores|activity score]], with a user's reputation, also known as their ''rating reliability''.
 The rating reliability is a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_hypothesis_testing computed estimate] based upon demonstrated talent and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ability ability], aka: [http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/merit merit].
@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 - Sami ''18 January, 2010'' [http://www.mywot.com/forum/5322-an-individuals-rating-rookie-bronze-silver-gold-platnium?comment=26320#comment-26320 forum entry]</blockquote>
-Some curious facts about rating reliability: [http://www.mywot.com/forum/21548-wot-is-a-dictatorship?comment=133164#comment-133164 cite]
+Some curious facts about rating reliability: [http://www.mywot.com/forum/21548-wot-is-a-dictatorship?comment=133164#comment-133164 cite].
 * Most users whose ratings are considered highly reliable are not very active. You won't meet them at the forum and they don't rate unusually many sites.
 * Since reliability estimates are not revealed to anyone, trying to game the system becomes more difficult. Most trusted users have no idea their ratings are more trusted than someone else's. If you don't know you have power, you also have no incentive to abuse it.
 * Reliability estimates are not binary values that are either on or off. They are composed of several components, which are all combined in to a single value from 0-100 separately for each rating component. This means that your child safety rating may have a different weight than the ratings in other components, for example.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 24 March 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	<br />		<br />
	- Sami ''18 January, 2010'' [http://www.mywot.com/forum/5322-an-individuals-rating-rookie-bronze-silver-gold-platnium?comment=26320#comment-26320 forum entry]</blockquote>		- Sami ''18 January, 2010'' [http://www.mywot.com/forum/5322-an-individuals-rating-rookie-bronze-silver-gold-platnium?comment=26320#comment-26320 forum entry]</blockquote>
		+
		+	Some curious facts about rating reliability: [http://www.mywot.com/forum/21548-wot-is-a-dictatorship?comment=133164#comment-133164 cite]
		+	* Most users whose ratings are considered highly reliable are not very active. You won't meet them at the forum and they don't rate unusually many sites.
		+	* Since reliability estimates are not revealed to anyone, trying to game the system becomes more difficult. Most trusted users have no idea their ratings are more trusted than someone else's. If you don't know you have power, you also have no incentive to abuse it.
		+	* Reliability estimates are not binary values that are either on or off. They are composed of several components, which are all combined in to a single value from 0-100 separately for each rating component. This means that your child safety rating may have a different weight than the ratings in other components, for example