Inaccurate data "

Site is entirely fundamentalist Christian propaganda with much incorrect or unproven information and highly biased against scientific facts and evolution. References are unreliable and does not account for both sides of the argument. Such information when taken literally is dangerous.

Please do not believe anything on this site. Use Wikipedia or other reliable sources for facts. "

I may not agree , but is another point of view = "

Racists and hate site, Racism is a very bad attitude. "

Rassistische Thesen und rechtsradikales Gedankengut werden hier verbreitet. Unglaublich, daß es das im 21. Jahrhundert noch gibt.

Racistic prejudices are spread here, incredible that this is possible in the 21st century "

Obviously the liberals hate this site, since none of the poor ratings are deserved. "

Hate site. "

Hateful content in this case. How dare it call itself an encyclopedia?! It is extraordinarily biased! Did you know they actually threaten *jail* time for vandalism? "

Seriously, why bash this site and give it bad ratings?

It's a conservative version of Wikipedia and it makes no bones about it's political leanings. Why is it unsafe? I'm not an American style Ultra-Christian conservative by any means, but that doesn't give me a reason to downrate the site.

I've recently rated this site, but of the 4 metrics on the scorecard the only one I've given it a dim view on was Trustworthiness, where I gave it a Yellow mark because of its extreme editorial slant.

Then again, anyone who comes here knows what they will be getting. "

Bad site. "