Protect Your Online Reputation From Cyber Threats With StopTheHacker's Free Daily Blacklist Monitoring.
Sign Up Now !WOT Reputation Scorecard
foxnews.com
![]() foxnews.comDescription:Breaking News, Latest News and Current News from FOXNews.com. Breaking news and video. Latest Current News: U.S., World, Entertainment, Health, Business, Technology, Politics, Sports.
|
CommentsSupplement your rating by leaving a comment. Comments provide more information, but do not affect the reputation. Read more Register / login to leave a comment. |



Ethical issues
Biased, untrustworthy, and often misleading news source. "
Bad customer experience
Blatant propaganda. "
Annoying ads or popups
Lots of ads but thankfully adblock plus blocked them all. "
Ethical issues
Faux news gets caught in lies all the time (google it). They claim to be news but they just provide entertainment that looks like news. You can't trust them for real news so go to a real news company like the BBC. I guess their weather is probably as accurate as the other news shows that air a couple hours earlier than it. "
Spyware or adware
This site contains Omniture Analytics which can be used to access all of your personal information if you don't have your system configured to block certain areas. "
Ethical issues
Slanted at Best "
Ethical issues
When double checking current and past stories, I have seen that the information presented is meant to play to a particular audience. Unfortunately, this site is mainly used for propaganda to fuel this audience. "
Ethical issues
Mouth piece of the Extream right of America - Lots of pop-ups and ads. Bad in every way - just my bias fair and balanced view. "
Ethical issues
Fox News is mostly filled with commentators and not actual news reporters, who state the world events. Even though their messages are clear and understandable, they become a staple of their reporting.
Fox News is conservatively biased; however, it definitely displays meaningful material. "
Ethical issues
In 2003, Fox news successfully argued they had the right to make untrue statements (admitting that this was their practice - source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Akre#Whistleblower_lawsuit) to the public and claim it is news. How can their "vendor reliability rating" be anything but bad?
While it is WOT's policy to go purely on votes, Fox has publicly admitted that their stock in trade is falsifying informaiton dispensed to the public as journalism, fully aware that public assumes that Fox has made good and honest efforts to validate the factualy accuracy of the information they promulgate. When in fact in a federal court of law in 2003 they made known publicly that this is not what they do.
In the case of a vendor that publicly admits falsifying information, WOT should leave the "vendor reliability' rating bottomed out, whth a note to the federal ruling supporting their practice of falsifying informaiton to the public. "
Total comments, including comment votes, by user chosen categories: