Is gov.uk Safe?

сайты которые они регистрируют оказываются аферистами,а именно BTC Traders и .другие,складывается впечятление что им всеравно за кого вписыватся,да относительно ненадежности трейдеров мне все извесно,но есть какието приделы и там.для вашей же безопасности не сильно доверяйте.для рускоязычников есть сайты понадежней.да и помните нас там не уважают.

Nietshade is correct, but referring to the Employment Service or whatever they call it these days (a section of this massive 'umbrella' government site): "Prospective employers are poorly vetted, if vetted at all, and users are vulnerable to scams. " Yes, because all the government's b.s. 'employment service' is, is a box-ticking exercise, designed to generate statistics so that the government can state it got x number of people into work. Whether that work is a 12-month contract or a 12-day contract (!) doesn't matter to them, and thus this is highly-unethical yet again. Women have apparently been told about becoming an 'escort' via this site and service. Go figure...

Tax payers are lied to by the government via the 'news' (propaganda) sections of this site. See: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/khat-to-be-made-a-class-c-drug "Although the ACMD did not recommend banning khat, it acknowledged an absence of robust evidence in a number of areas" a Ministers are expected to take these broader concerns ('protection of vulnerable members of the community', whilst criminalising drugs makes ANY drug problem worse, and the evidence is MASSIVE for that!) - Meaning deciding based on a (delusion, therefore) LACK OF EVIDENCE is more important in the Ministers' decision than the EVIDENCE. How is that anything but an insult to the taxpayer and the very rule of law? The judicial process is inherently based on evidence, and is full of legal principles based on 'reasonable evidence and reasonable probability'. Who are the mere government to override all the legal processes since our way of law was established nearly 1000 years ago?! The only one is the most disgusting - being dictated to by the DEA and the US / UN Narcotics CONTROL Board. THEY (who cause countless suffering via their unelected, undemocratic 'rules') are who the decision is for. Them and them ALONE. "The government will ban qat so that we can protect vulnerable members of our communities and *send a clear message to our international partners* and qat smugglers that the UK is serious about stopping the illegal trafficking of qat." But the trafficking of Qat isn't illegal, wasn't illegal. Oh, sorry, the USA doesn't like QAT, so everyone else in the globe must follow or be imprisoned! That's literally how it works. Why tolerate Nazism-by-stealth, which this definitely is?! "and our international responsibilities." - Theresa May - is referring to that, and playing-down the importance of US dication on this matter, too! Why is there a need to lie/hide/play-down the decision-making hierarchy? I'll tell you why! 'None are more hopelessly-enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free'. If you can't control drugs (enforcement) then you can't control the profit from them. Think about that for a minute. This is nothing to do with harm-reduction and all to do with money and control of that money. 'For what purpose?' is a question for another day... But there's much evidence and opinion that the CIA is heavily-involved in drug-running. Have a think about the dots I've tried to join for you above, and what it means for freedom and democracy on this planet... Whether you use drugs or not (I think literally every human does in one form or another), this issue is PROFOUND. Peace.