Is nytimes.com Safe?

Trusted by WOT

Website security score

89%
WOT’s security score is based on our unique technology and community expert reviews.
Is this website claimed?
No
Community reviews
★ 4.7
WOT’s algorithm
93%
Child Safety
93%

What does the community say?

Leave a review

How would you rate this website from 1 to 5?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Share your feedback and help the communityReviews must consist of at least 15 charactersChoose the tags that best describe this website
Malware or Viruses
Poor customer service
Phishing
Scam
Potentially illegal
Misleading or unethical
Privacy Risk
Suspicious
Hate, discrimination
Spam
Potential unwanted program
Ads / Pop-ups
Adult Content
Incidental nudity
Gruesome or shocking
Cancel
Post Review
4.7
starstarstarstarhalf-star

Based on 319 reviews

Sort by:
Newest
нормальный развлекательный ресурс, но редко пользуюсь им
Helpful
I like the purpose of RE!fundbacknet it’s a good one and people can make use of it
Helpful
the always have some agenda i dont like it
Helpful
For sure, I know that this company don`t need to bother me, because I'm living in another country. But, lemme tell you one thing, NY times isn`t worth calling themselves an unbiased news agency. Maybe, I dunno the real things, cuz I`m an insider or sort of, but from the third party side, it looks absolutely foolish. I know something about politics and can claim that some news companies are bribed to use their communication channels for sympathizing with a certain party. How it`s possible to trust them and their broadcast information after that, even though they reach promptly.
Helpful
I think everyone enjoys reading the NYtimes. This is simply the pinnacle of the news industry. There are absolutely zero issues with their website.
Helpful
Had to stop reading it. It is written for an audience with one political view. It does not make an effort to present both sides.
Helpful
Don't want to claim that New york times are the best medium out there, but it's definitely better than other medium like the Guardian. Abundance of topics makes me binge-read articles, get essential information and absorb it, like... to understand where I can potentially apply receive knowledge and this is inspiring for real. Some people prefer reading books to get knowledge, others, like myself, prefer to read newspapers and various articles from experts of the industry. IDK, for me th latter approach is better.
Helpful
нормальный развлекательный ресурс
Helpful
American newspaper website.
Helpful
safe site. International news but tons of propaganda
Helpful
Читаю почти каждый день,новости тут хорошие
Helpful
I think everyone enjoys reading the NYtimes. This is simply the pinnacle of the news industry. There are absolutely zero issues with their website.
Helpful
Driving is misleading and without information, they masterfully write fake news.
1
газета номер один для меня. каждый раз читаю с большим удовольствием
Helpful
One of the main newspaper for me. Subscribed for 5 years already.
Helpful
Posting true news. If you are writer then you can get chance to post your opinion.
Helpful
Вполне не плохой сайт, абсолютно безопасен
Helpful
I used to have a better opinion of this site until the recent (2016) demonstration of editorial bias that has eclipsed their role as reporting news and put them squarely into the role of attempting to create news and shape public opinion for the sake of a political agenda (the blatant campaigning for Hilary Clinton and subsequent demeaning reportage of Senator Sanders). As it is, this paper is now more in the mold of a Hearst-style, dynastic mouthpiece for special interests, thus is not an unbiased source of news. Editorial oversight is problematic in that reporting on current events is too often tainted with issues of libel and character assassination, for example, the initial reporting on Alec Baldwin's involvement in a fatal on-set shooting with an alleged prop-gun which pointedly described Baldwin's previous unrelated encounters with the police. Article comments are not just heavily moderated, the editors selectively pick comments from a select group of commentors who are a de facto part of the NY Times editorial oversight while ignoring other comments or deleting them hours after being posted. This site uses an aggressive paywall as well. Much of the reporting is still of higher quality than many papers, only one should read it carefully and be aware of these problems regarding bias.
1
12345
...
16
Check If You’ve Been CompromisedConnect with Google to scan your browsing history.
Connect with Google
As seen on
By signing in, you agree to data collection and use as described in our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy
alternative-placeholder

About WOT

We reviewed more than 2 Million website and counting. WOT is a lightweight extension designed to help you browse quickly and securely. It will clean your browser, speed it up, and protect your private information.

Is this your website?

Claim your website to access WOT’s business tools and connect with your customers.
Claim This Website
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalization. By continuing, you agree to our cookie policy.
Accept