Is richardcharnin.wordpress.com Safe?

Untrusted by WOT

Website security score

43%
WOT’s security score is based on our unique technology and community expert reviews.
Is this website claimed?
No
Community reviews
★ 2.5
WOT’s algorithm
50%
Child Safety
N/A

What does the community say?

Leave a review

How would you rate this website from 1 to 5?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Share your feedback and help the communityReviews must consist of at least 15 charactersChoose the tags that best describe this website
Malware or Viruses
Poor customer service
Phishing
Scam
Potentially illegal
Misleading or unethical
Privacy Risk
Suspicious
Hate, discrimination
Spam
Potential unwanted program
Ads / Pop-ups
Adult Content
Incidental nudity
Gruesome or shocking
Cancel
Post Review
2.5
starstarhalf-starempty-starempty-star

Based on 2 reviews

Sort by:
Newest
One of the very few sources of an independent analysis of voting in US. 12 to 14 states use electronic voting without paper ballots such that auditing voting results is impossible. Inquiring minds are always open to challenges to conventional wisdom. Closed minds not so much. Charnin's analyses are straight forward and appear transparent to this old engineer. Read much and think. EVERYONE is entitled to their opinions and we should respect them whether one accepts their validity or not. If one does not like an analysis then provide an alternative for comparison. Ad hominem attacks are so last century!
Helpful
The only positive thing I can say about this site is that it does not use an unusual number of trackers. My Stands browser plug-in only found three items to block. Other than that, the site is full of the ravings of a tendentious crank, the kind of person who always knows The Truth before he sets out to "prove" it. His statistical equations are designed to overawe visitors who don't have a background in statistics, but his errors in reasoning can be detected without such a background. Whatever the issue -- JFK's assassination, elections, the Las Vegas mass shooting -- he always assumes there's a conspiracy. For example, he advances a malicious theory that survivors of the Las Vegas shooting are being murdered. How does he reach that conclusion? By counting every death, by any cause whatsoever, as a "homicide." Never mind that police and coroners found no evidence of homicide. Richard Charnin knows better! Just ask him. This website is only useful for providing examples of dishonest conspiracy-mongering. It may also serve as a litmus test: If a person finds any of Charnin's arguments convincing, that person urgently needs to learn how to think. If Charnin seems convincing, the convinced person will fall for anything and is likely to be repeatedly cheated.
Helpful
Check If You’ve Been CompromisedConnect with Google to scan your browsing history.
Connect with Google
As seen on
By signing in, you agree to data collection and use as described in our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy
alternative-placeholder

About WOT

We reviewed more than 2 Million website and counting. WOT is a lightweight extension designed to help you browse quickly and securely. It will clean your browser, speed it up, and protect your private information.

Is this your website?

Claim your website to access WOT’s business tools and connect with your customers.
Claim This Website
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalization. By continuing, you agree to our cookie policy.
Accept