Is sepp.org Safe?
Trusted by WOT
Website security score
33%
Is this website claimed?
No
Community reviews
★ 1.9
WOT’s algorithm
39%
Child Safety
N/A
What does the community say?
Leave a review
Share your feedback and help the communityReviews must consist of at least 15 charactersChoose the tags that best describe this website
Malware or Viruses
Poor customer service
Phishing
Scam
Potentially illegal
Misleading or unethical
Privacy Risk
Suspicious
Hate, discrimination
Spam
Potential unwanted program
Ads / Pop-ups
Adult Content
Incidental nudity
Gruesome or shocking
Cancel
Post Review
1.9
Based on 10 reviews
Sort by:
Newest
This site and organization are a deliberate attempt by corrupted scientists and a tobacco PR firm to advance the false notion that climate change is not really occurring or that it is not driven by monied interests.
See: *****
Helpful
The site provides accurate, detailed and well supported assessments of climate science.
Helpful
The only reason sepp is Woted is because so many of those people pushing the global warming scare are sufficiently unethical to deliberately silence their opponents- as opposed to engaging in open debate.
Helpful
Disregard any WOT rating on sites not sharing the ideology of anthropogenic climate warming. WOT has been taken over by global warming fundamentalists and the WOT admins seems not to care... WOT should not be involved with value/expert judgements, but with factual dangers that sites pose to one's computer...
1
The weekly summary of news on this site, critical of the official UN's IPCC politicised and dogmatic approach to climate science, is factual. Some might not like the message, but that gives them no right to try and deny free speech.
2
I am weary of having radical environmentalists claim that sites with which they disagree are providing inaccurate or misleading information. The subject of catastrophic global warming is among the most controversial of all environmental issues. This site provides reasoned and accurate analysis of data and provides a valuable counter point to the sometimes inaccurate and overstated conclusions of the IPCC. I wish that the radicals would quit lying; I think that they would if they realized that by lying they are sacrificing their credibility.
2
Leftists hate the real science reported here - they prefer junk science to support their economic and political agendas.
2
WOT should not be used for political reasons by left wing agitators. This site provides a sceptical response to the orthodoxy of left wing politicised science.
5
In 1990, they were claiming that asbestos is safe, pesticides are safe and there is no problem with ozone layer...
It is not a reliable source of information.
5
Hello All,
These are some sites that present the other side of the global warming argument.. That it is essentially a big scam etc..
3
Check If You’ve Been CompromisedConnect with Google to scan your browsing history.By signing in, you agree to data collection and use as described in our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy
Connect with Google
As seen on
About WOT
We reviewed more than 2 Million website and counting. WOT is a lightweight extension designed to help you browse quickly and securely. It will clean your browser, speed it up, and protect your private information.Is this your website?
Claim your website to access WOT’s business tools and connect with your customers.Claim This Website
INSTALL WOTThis site uses cookies for analytics and personalization. By continuing, you agree to our cookie policy.
Accept