Is thehealthyhomeeconomist.com Safe?

Suspicious website

Website security score

57%
WOT’s security score is based on our unique technology and community expert reviews.
Is this website claimed?
No
Community reviews
★ 3
WOT’s algorithm
59%
Child Safety
60%

What does the community say?

Leave a review

How would you rate this website from 1 to 5?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Share your feedback and help the communityReviews must consist of at least 15 charactersChoose the tags that best describe this website
Malware or Viruses
Poor customer service
Phishing
Scam
Potentially illegal
Misleading or unethical
Privacy Risk
Suspicious
Hate, discrimination
Spam
Potential unwanted program
Ads / Pop-ups
Adult Content
Incidental nudity
Gruesome or shocking
Cancel
Post Review
3
starstarstarempty-starempty-star

Based on 42 reviews

Sort by:
Newest
I found nothing on the site to be Dangerous or unhealthy. Why the warning?
Helpful
That people actually believe the drive on this site is cause for concern. Highly misleading claims.
Helpful
This site is utter garbage spewing fear-mongering, proven bogus pseudoscience
Helpful
Crazy site, full of nonsense and pseudoscience, guaranteed to make you LESS healthy. Absolutely loathes vaccination, and spreads all the lies and disinformation of the anti-vax death cult.
1
Writer has no experience about what she writes - it is even stated in the disclaimer. Gives dangerous and misleading advices.
1
I can't don't see why this site should be red flagged. It may be controversial, but I don't think that is enough to rate it as untrustworthy.
Helpful
I have absolutely NO PROBLEMS with this site. There are no viruses, no improper language, perfectly fine for children. I don't know why there would be any complaints.
Helpful
***** Snopes says it's PROBABLY FALSE Don't believe everything you read.
Helpful
I've read many of her blogs and watched many videos for recipes and suggestions that are relevant to my Paleo/Primal lifestyle. I cannot believe the negative feedback this site is receiving. No doubit it is THIS negative feedback which is based on a misunderstanding/misinterpretation of what it takes to be healthy in this country. I read one reader's remarks on her site where she apparently seemed shocked to read "eggs and cream," and quickly asserted, "unhealthy." Just one more example of CW's (conventional wisdom) grasp on the collective psyches of so many Americans who are utterly shocked to learn that, yes, FAT (the right types, of course) are healthy for you! Has she or have others looked around at the results of our low/no-fat, processed foods, grain-fed obsession thanks to the FDA's guidelines. Yet, I don't see any mention of the FDA's history of rampant misinformation and unprofessionalism. I am not pleased that those who are so blatantly uninformed can so skew the ratings of such a valuable site. Perhaps she may be off-base now and then (don't know since I've found what she's had to say and instruct quite valuable), but those who wish to put their trust in a "professional"? What does this mean? I have been researching health and nutrition for 40 years, but my degrees are in English and Clinical Psych. Do all these years of "UNprofessional" wisdom mean nothing without the official title of...what? a certified nutritionist. I can tell horror stories about the health advice given to my clients by respected "nutritionists." Please...
Helpful
It is not just that the claims on this site are unfounded and unproven by any senssible scientific testing. It is that there is no scientific, logical or common sense underpinning for the whole scam. It is pre-scientific nonsense being sold for profit and it is a disgrace that people in charge of large organisations such as the NHS and Boots are involved with it.
2
Found the site through a post about Gardsil. Was dissapointed to find the level of misinformation, scaremongering and demonstrably false claims that are on it. There's a great takedown of the article on the NZ SciBlogs site.
1
I think this is a good site. It appears to generate bad ratings because of philosophical differences. M aybe WOT needs some kind of rating for this kind of controversy on values, just to clarify when you see the rating what it's for.
Helpful
Once again the trolls and the brainwashed are doing their best to censor information that is opposed to their own diss' and misinformation. That's not what WOT is for and it threatens the value of WOT as a security tool.
Helpful
I have no idea why this site would have a less than green rating...I have been learning from them for years. There are 27 positive comments and 3 negative comments so far.....I'm totally about to give up on WOT!
Helpful
Very informative look on the other side if one chooses not to have a vaccine. It is nice to know the chemicals in a vaccine first before making the decision.
Helpful
Alternative or controversial medicine...but not as the explanatory tag says ( controversial in nature..) on the contrary, Sarah is backing up the most natural medicine! Rich in nutrients food is our medicine.
Helpful
fear mongering and mis-information
Helpful
reminds us that sometimes what our forefathers used to do it was better for our health
Helpful
i find this site to have good information.
1
Looks like a good site with valuable information.
1
123
Check If You’ve Been CompromisedConnect with Google to scan your browsing history.
Connect with Google
As seen on
By signing in, you agree to data collection and use as described in our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy
alternative-placeholder

About WOT

We reviewed more than 2 Million website and counting. WOT is a lightweight extension designed to help you browse quickly and securely. It will clean your browser, speed it up, and protect your private information.

Is this your website?

Claim your website to access WOT’s business tools and connect with your customers.
Claim This Website
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalization. By continuing, you agree to our cookie policy.
Accept