Ist breitbart.com sicher?

Vertraut von WOT

Sicherheitsbewertung der Website

77%
Die Sicherheitsbewertung von WOT basiert auf unserer einzigartigen Technologie und den Bewertungen der Community-Experten.
Wird diese Website beansprucht?
Nein
Community-Rezensionen
★ 4
WOTs Algorithmus
81%
Jugendschutz
80%

Was sagt die Gemeinschaft dazu?

Eine Bewertung hinterlassen

Wie würden Sie diese Website auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewerten?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Teilen Sie Ihr Feedback und helfen Sie der GemeinschaftBewertungen müssen aus mindestens 15 Zeichen bestehenWählen Sie die Tags, die diese Website am besten beschreiben
Malware oder Viren
Schlechter Kundenservice
Phishing
Scam
Potenziell illegal
Irreführend oder unethisch
Risiko für die Privatsphäre
Verdächtig
Hass, Diskrimination
Spam
Potenziell unerwünschtes Programm
Werbung / Pop-ups
Inhalte für Erwachsene
Zufällige Nacktheit
Grausam oder schockierend
Abbrechen
Bewertung veröffentlichen
4
starstarstarstarempty-star

Basierend auf 103 Bewertungen

Sortieren nach:
Neuestes
This is a pseudo-news site that offers political disinformation, pseudoscience, rumor, conspiracy and extremely biased opinion-based articles. The site is a deliberate attempt to manufacture political disinformation instead of reporting news in a factual manner with little or no bias. The site provides a platform for anonymous commenters who promote and amplify known conspiracy theories, disinformation, etc. and is not a reliable source of information whatsoever. This site continually fails fact-checks and is fraudulent in its intentions. See: ***** ***** ***** ***** A wise person would avoid this site – untrustworthy.
14
Truthful and accurate. A good source of FACTUAL information.
Hilfreich
This is a safe site. No malware, I think that WOT safety ratings are being abused for political reasons. I look to WOT to tell me if visiting a certain website is dangerous for my computer. WOT should add a rating for actually safe or dangerous sites FOR MY COMPUTER and another rating for I'M TRYING TO CENSOR THIS WEBSITE FOR ITS POLITICAL VIEWS.
Hilfreich
Excellent source of misinformation. Numerous failed fact checks almost all related to extreme right political propaganda. Loyal comrades here. The quality and reliability of this source has fallen precipitously since Andrew Breitbart's death.
2
Biased alt-right web page with misinformation.
2
Excellent source of news. Breitbart was founded by Andrew Breitbart who was not afraid of telling the truth no matter how much the Government & the Media Industrial Complex hated him for it. Sadly he is not around anymore as he passed away March 1, 2012.
Hilfreich
No political correctness or censorship. It is a real journalism.
1
If WOT is going to be used to rate sites based on political affiliations, then it will lose its credibility. Breitbart is a web site that is unashamedly right leaning on the political playground. The Left will hate it, the Right will love it. But Wot is not here to serve any political agenda.
3
Dreadful site pedalling far-right misinformation, pseudo-science and extremist views - not to be trusted!
5
Objective, trustworthy news site.
1
Conservative 5 star news site.
1
Right wing disinformation and incitement to violence
3
It's a website which promotes lies, hatred and fascism. I really don't want to exist such websites based on lies, false and biased information
3
Breitbart carries out right-wing misinformation campaigns.
3
It's a shame that such a bad site as Breitbart can influence American politics ( better said Trump ). In a free country like the USA ( ???? ) you can't censor this unfortunately. But the site spreads fake news, rumour, lies, gossip and deliberate disinformation for the sake of politics and money.
4
Disinformation at its worst. Pure hate speech.
3
If WOT is going to be used to rate sites based on political affiliations, then it will lose its credibility. Breitbart is a web site that is unashamedly right leaning on the political playground. The Left will hate it, the Right will love it. But Wot is not here to serve any political agenda.
1
Almost as bad as inforwars
3
Breitbart came to existence sometime during the 90s or early 2000’s as a conservative way to convolute every message that has to do with politics, women’s health, and just about anything you can think of. I read them before anyone else even knew they existed and found that they did things like go undercover to underhandedly trick certain organizations into looking bad. This was on the news all over the place and I’m sure someone there has heard about it and the things that followed. Breitbart is full of misrepresentations and missed leading if not out right lies and as such should not be given a good review by anyone who actually cares about America instead of just one party and there anti-everything stance
6
I don't know how this site can have a green rating. It is complete propaganda, makes no sense, and is wildly unethical.
5
12345
...
6
Prüfen Sie, ob Sie kompromittiert wurdenVerbinden Sie sich mit Google, um Ihren Browserverlauf zu scannen.
Mit Google verbinden
Gesehen bei
Mit Ihrer Anmeldung stimmen Sie der Datenerfassung und -nutzung zu, wie sie in unserer Nutzungsbedingungen und Datenschutzrichtlinie
alternative-placeholder

Über WOT

Wir haben mehr als 2 Millionen Websites überprüft, Tendenz steigend. WOT ist eine leichtgewichtige Erweiterung, mit der Sie schnell und sicher surfen können. Es bereinigt Ihren Browser, beschleunigt ihn und schützt Ihre privaten Daten.

Ist das Ihre Website?

Melden Sie Ihre Website an, um Zugang zu WOTs Business-Tools zu erhalten und mit Ihren Kunden in Kontakt zu treten.
Diese Website beanspruchen
Diese Website verwendet Cookies für Analysezwecke und zur Personalisierung. Indem Sie fortfahren, erklären Sie sich mit unseren Cookie-Richtlinie.
Akzeptieren