Ist icr.org sicher?

Vertraut von WOT

Sicherheitsbewertung der Website

66%
Die Sicherheitsbewertung von WOT basiert auf unserer einzigartigen Technologie und den Bewertungen der Community-Experten.
Wird diese Website beansprucht?
Nein
Community-Rezensionen
★ 3.5
WOTs Algorithmus
69%
Jugendschutz
70%

Was sagt die Gemeinschaft dazu?

Eine Bewertung hinterlassen

Wie würden Sie diese Website auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewerten?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Teilen Sie Ihr Feedback und helfen Sie der GemeinschaftBewertungen müssen aus mindestens 15 Zeichen bestehenWählen Sie die Tags, die diese Website am besten beschreiben
Malware oder Viren
Schlechter Kundenservice
Phishing
Scam
Potenziell illegal
Irreführend oder unethisch
Risiko für die Privatsphäre
Verdächtig
Hass, Diskrimination
Spam
Potenziell unerwünschtes Programm
Werbung / Pop-ups
Inhalte für Erwachsene
Zufällige Nacktheit
Grausam oder schockierend
Abbrechen
Bewertung veröffentlichen
3.5
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star

Basierend auf 36 Bewertungen

Sortieren nach:
Neuestes
Another religious cult site. Contains bible-literalism, speaks against some sexual orientations, and has anti-science theology. It is another right-winged religious site.
1
This website promotes pseudoscience, defiling real science to preserve both personal and religious agendas.
1
Pseudoscience, nonsense. Diplomas by this institute are not accepted by regular universities.
1
How does a site this fraught with fraud maintain a "good" rating? ICR promotes nonsense as science, and fights to undermine the education of our children.
2
An "Institute for research," of any kind, should not write articles full of emotionally charged language that seek to force the data to fit one pre-determined solution. Good research starts with information and then evaluates theories in the light of the data. However, this site evaluates data in the light of a theory. Due to the ethical issues of this website's reporting, I cannot vote it trustworthy or safe for children. At first glance, the site appears to be free of spyware though, so the other scores will remain high.
4
Slows down rational thoughts and condemns anything colliding with written literature created long ago to fill our gap of basic human curiosity of life's meaning. All this and claiming it to be a professional scientific site. In other words dangerous and self fulfilling nonsense is written all over it.
4
Lies and misinformation. A disgusting pile of political propaganda.
4
Psuedoscience & lies.
8
This parades as a scientific resource, when in fact is a religious website. I don't mind a religious website per se, but to parade as a resource of scientific rigor is ethically wrong.
10
The site could have been a good site for an alternate viewpoint if not for the fact that the articles are misleading and lacking research. The header uses such misleading words as "accurate" and "certain", but the articles do not provide any accurate or certain proof. The proof typically is based on the author's opinion. Example (from an author who prefaces his article with the disclaimer that he's "not particularly up on human anatomy"): "A person can function quite adequately without the gallbladder under normal conditions, but it's better to keep it. Mine was infected and damaged and is now gone, and I haven't missed it . . . but I wonder. ...Ever since sin entered the perfect creation and all systems began to deteriorate, sometimes things don't perform optimally." The author offers no proof to dispute the argument that the gallbladder is a vestigial organ, aside from the notion that "sin" has deteriorated our bodies, causing some things to not perform "optimally". He can give no reason as to why humans have tailbones, wisdom teeth, or other parts of the body considered unnecessary. If we follow his assumption that sin has caused things to "not perform optimally", how does he explain death from old age? Sin does not cause organs to deteriorate and age. The flesh is simply not immortal.
11
Sitio Creacionista. muy buena información para los que creen en la Biblia y la defienden desde su primer versiculo. Claro, a los RELIGIOSOS EVOLUCIONISTAS no les gusta, pues son INTOLERANTES a cualquiera que piense distinto a ellos y nos califican como "mentes débiles". "
2
Shows the science behind creation.
4
Great devotional for each day.
5
The organization has been a great source for scientific information concerning the origins of the universe for many years.
12
This organization has been accused of being an unaccredited diploma mill, which offers degrees that would not be accepted by other institutions.
13
Great science aspect apologetic site for Christian research.
10
12
Prüfen Sie, ob Sie kompromittiert wurdenVerbinden Sie sich mit Google, um Ihren Browserverlauf zu scannen.
Mit Google verbinden
Gesehen bei
Mit Ihrer Anmeldung stimmen Sie der Datenerfassung und -nutzung zu, wie sie in unserer Nutzungsbedingungen und Datenschutzrichtlinie
alternative-placeholder

Über WOT

Wir haben mehr als 2 Millionen Websites überprüft, Tendenz steigend. WOT ist eine leichtgewichtige Erweiterung, mit der Sie schnell und sicher surfen können. Es bereinigt Ihren Browser, beschleunigt ihn und schützt Ihre privaten Daten.

Ist das Ihre Website?

Melden Sie Ihre Website an, um Zugang zu WOTs Business-Tools zu erhalten und mit Ihren Kunden in Kontakt zu treten.
Diese Website beanspruchen
Diese Website verwendet Cookies für Analysezwecke und zur Personalisierung. Indem Sie fortfahren, erklären Sie sich mit unseren Cookie-Richtlinie.
Akzeptieren