Ist livingwhole.org sicher?

Unbekannte Website

Sicherheitsbewertung der Website

18%
Die Sicherheitsbewertung von WOT basiert auf unserer einzigartigen Technologie und den Bewertungen der Community-Experten.
Wird diese Website beansprucht?
Nein
Community-Rezensionen
★ 1.1
WOTs Algorithmus
21%
Jugendschutz
N/A

Was sagt die Gemeinschaft dazu?

Eine Bewertung hinterlassen

Wie würden Sie diese Website auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewerten?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Teilen Sie Ihr Feedback und helfen Sie der GemeinschaftBewertungen müssen aus mindestens 15 Zeichen bestehenWählen Sie die Tags, die diese Website am besten beschreiben
Malware oder Viren
Schlechter Kundenservice
Phishing
Scam
Potenziell illegal
Irreführend oder unethisch
Risiko für die Privatsphäre
Verdächtig
Hass, Diskrimination
Spam
Potenziell unerwünschtes Programm
Werbung / Pop-ups
Inhalte für Erwachsene
Zufällige Nacktheit
Grausam oder schockierend
Abbrechen
Bewertung veröffentlichen
1.1
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star

Basierend auf 12 Bewertungen

Sortieren nach:
Neuestes
Promotes dangerous pseudo-science (e.g. myths about fluoride, vaccines, chelation products, etc.). A thorough debunking can be found (among other places) in Paul Offit's books "Do You Believe in Magic" and "Bad Faith."
2
Sure, it may be anti-vaccine, but that doesn't mean it is untrustworthy. Do your research people and allow others to do the same. Not all vaccines are necessary. Follow the money, and see where you end up.
Hilfreich
I think this site and accompanying article have been marked as untrustworthy only because the content is contrary to popular opinion of pro-choice. The question whether this article is suitable for children is not exactly relevant, as young children that might be bothered by the subject matter would probably not follow it anyway, as it is written for a higher grade-level of reading comprehension. Just because the subject matter discusses some difficult topics such as realities of abortion, doesn't mean the website is unsafe. The article does not cause anything to happen when you click on it that any other website does, and does not redirect you to other sites. I think it is wrong for people to use WOT to target a website as bad, simply because they disagree with the content. This is still supposed to be a FREE INTERNET where people are entitled to their opinions, and WOT should not be used to censor those of a contrary opinion.
1
I found the article on measles from a non-vaccing parent quite informative, and since I'm familiar with much of the science on this issue, I was not taken aback. I have a feeling the negative reviews of the site are more "political" (trying to squelch non-mainstream views) than they are substantive, but that's just a suspicion.
3
This is a safe site to visit. No malware, or spyware. This is a great site. Great site for natural health, whole living.
2
There is nothing wrong with this site. There are no drive by downloads, no viruses, no spam, no malware, no deceptive marketing. Please stop using WOT as a tool to censor information you don't agree with. That is not it's purpose!
3
This site is well-written and contains valid opinion. It is being unfairly "red-listed" by people abusing WOT in an attempt to scare readers away from opinions with which they disagree... or perhaps are being paid to slander. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: WOT should be used the way I believe it was intended: to protect users from computer viruses, worms, & such, as well as to protect them from accidentally accessing pornographic material. IT SHOULD NOT BE USED TO CENSOR OPINION OR TO DISCOURAGE PEOPLE FROM READING THE WIDEST POSSIBLE RANGE OF OPINION. You pro-vaxxers who are behind this campaign to censor sites that you happen to disagree with - or are being paid to slander - should be ashamed of yourselves.
5
It mainly pushes junk-science and false claims, basically, do not believe anything they say.
6
This site is a direct threat to your life. Following advice given on this page increases your risk of serious illness and death.
5
Anti-vaccination propaganda. NO, there is zero link between vaccinations and autism. There is massive correlation between not being vaccinated and long lasting health damage, even death. Not vaccinating your children is child abuse. Telling others not to is accessory in child abuse. Also other unscientific rubbish like raw food (are they really trying to kill themselves?!?) Unashamedly spreads literal lies about health and food. I'm sure she believes it, but they are still lies.
5
This site promotes anti science, pro disease retoric
10
This site provides dangerously unscientific advice on health issues, particularly in relation to vaccination. If the advice is followed, it will lead to possible infant deaths, as very young children cannot be immunised against life-threatening diseases such as polio and pertussis.
9
Prüfen Sie, ob Sie kompromittiert wurdenVerbinden Sie sich mit Google, um Ihren Browserverlauf zu scannen.
Mit Google verbinden
Gesehen bei
Mit Ihrer Anmeldung stimmen Sie der Datenerfassung und -nutzung zu, wie sie in unserer Nutzungsbedingungen und Datenschutzrichtlinie
alternative-placeholder

Über WOT

Wir haben mehr als 2 Millionen Websites überprüft, Tendenz steigend. WOT ist eine leichtgewichtige Erweiterung, mit der Sie schnell und sicher surfen können. Es bereinigt Ihren Browser, beschleunigt ihn und schützt Ihre privaten Daten.

Ist das Ihre Website?

Melden Sie Ihre Website an, um Zugang zu WOTs Business-Tools zu erhalten und mit Ihren Kunden in Kontakt zu treten.
Diese Website beanspruchen
Diese Website verwendet Cookies für Analysezwecke und zur Personalisierung. Indem Sie fortfahren, erklären Sie sich mit unseren Cookie-Richtlinie.
Akzeptieren