Ist sciencebasedmedicine.org sicher?

Vertraut von WOT

Sicherheitsbewertung der Website

89%
Die Sicherheitsbewertung von WOT basiert auf unserer einzigartigen Technologie und den Bewertungen der Community-Experten.
Wird diese Website beansprucht?
Nein
Community-Rezensionen
★ 4.7
WOTs Algorithmus
93%
Jugendschutz
92%

Was sagt die Gemeinschaft dazu?

Eine Bewertung hinterlassen

Wie würden Sie diese Website auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewerten?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Teilen Sie Ihr Feedback und helfen Sie der GemeinschaftBewertungen müssen aus mindestens 15 Zeichen bestehenWählen Sie die Tags, die diese Website am besten beschreiben
Malware oder Viren
Schlechter Kundenservice
Phishing
Scam
Potenziell illegal
Irreführend oder unethisch
Risiko für die Privatsphäre
Verdächtig
Hass, Diskrimination
Spam
Potenziell unerwünschtes Programm
Werbung / Pop-ups
Inhalte für Erwachsene
Zufällige Nacktheit
Grausam oder schockierend
Abbrechen
Bewertung veröffentlichen
4.7
starstarstarstarhalf-star

Basierend auf 36 Bewertungen

Sortieren nach:
Neuestes
Methodical approach to parroting the official narritave
Hilfreich
Good science blog.
1
This site is an excellent source for science and health-related issues that rely upon science. I recommend this site as being eminently trustworthy.
1
Linus Pauling was a threat and had evidence to suggest that modern medicine was not science based at all. Then these debunker sites called exactly "science based medicine" pop up. Oh dear, the irony. Your naming convention imply's you are not that confident that medicine is actually science based.
1
This site claims to be "science-based medicine", but this is just a code for an excuse to attack forms of medicine that they don't like, including the obvious quackery (which is good to attack) as well as the attempts at modernizing the medical system, or applying more personal approaches (no reason to attack these.) Unfortunately, these attack dogs can't distinguish good vs. bad.. New and experimental = bad according their fixed mindset. If you came here to find out whether something new and unusual in the medical field is OK or not, their answer is simply "no". That's the safe position no matter what. They love to use science to support their viewpoints, but resort to pure old emotion and logical fallacies when attacking anything new. The site certainly is NOT harmful, but not as scientific as the name implies.
1
This website is the best site for accurate analysis of information. Unfortunately, the anti-science people does not get the truth and down vote this website.
1
Artículos rigurosos sobre polémicas en el ámbito de la ciencia y de la medicina
Hilfreich
It does what it says on the tin, quality information on science based medicine and debunking of quackery.
2
Biased website. Anti-religious material also.
1
Lots of scripts but the blog runs fine without any of them. Good information.
5
The site's claims are unfounded. The use of junk pseudoscience is abundant. International scientific consensus all over the world disagrees with everything this page promotes. This page is pure junk.
6
Go to sites like this if you want science and reason behind your medicine. Hokey people who believe in things like snake oil and other scams are going to vote against sites like this.
7
An excellent resource for all topics relating to science and medicine. Here you can find in-depth analyses covering the full spectrum of 'alternative' medicine, including a critical examination of the scientific evidence (or lack thereof) in support of their use. Essays on medical ethics, academia, public health policy, and science in the media are also insightful. Criticism is also given to the legitimate shortcomings of the current state of the healthcare profession. This site is an essential reference for medical students, doctors, nurses and anyone else working in healthcare. Science-Based Medicine is everything that The Dr. Oz Show should have been.
6
Excellent, science-based website
4
To resume this site opinion; alternative medicine is full of side effects while there are full of benefits taking traditional drug medicine (they dont even discuss the very dangerous side effects of MOST pharmaceutical drugs). Yea...
5
David Gorski, the site owner, is a scammer, pulling in millions from BigPharma. By receiving the booty through a third party, his employer, Wayne State University, he covers his tracks just like all BigPharma front men. Don't believe it? lol. Just google: David Gorski, Riluzole,Sanofi-Aventis
4
Medical professionals dispelling health related myths.
8
A damn good site for #science and medical info, especially debunking #quackery. Should be in everyone's bookmarks. #medicine
11
The go-to site for any question about medical claims.
6
Fantastic site - this multi-author blog is devastatingly good at surgically dissecting pseudoscience, alt-med scams, and the craziness of anti-vaxxers.
9
12
Prüfen Sie, ob Sie kompromittiert wurdenVerbinden Sie sich mit Google, um Ihren Browserverlauf zu scannen.
Mit Google verbinden
Gesehen bei
Mit Ihrer Anmeldung stimmen Sie der Datenerfassung und -nutzung zu, wie sie in unserer Nutzungsbedingungen und Datenschutzrichtlinie
alternative-placeholder

Über WOT

Wir haben mehr als 2 Millionen Websites überprüft, Tendenz steigend. WOT ist eine leichtgewichtige Erweiterung, mit der Sie schnell und sicher surfen können. Es bereinigt Ihren Browser, beschleunigt ihn und schützt Ihre privaten Daten.

Ist das Ihre Website?

Melden Sie Ihre Website an, um Zugang zu WOTs Business-Tools zu erhalten und mit Ihren Kunden in Kontakt zu treten.
Diese Website beanspruchen
Diese Website verwendet Cookies für Analysezwecke und zur Personalisierung. Indem Sie fortfahren, erklären Sie sich mit unseren Cookie-Richtlinie.
Akzeptieren