Ist vaccinationdecisions.net sicher?

Judy Wilyman is an anti-vaccination conspiracy theorist. Despite claiming to have completed "research" to support her claims that no vaccines are safe and secret well funded lobby groups are behind a campaign to force vaccination, she has done no research. Her work has been roundly criticised and her theories debunked. All she has to offer is a collection of other authors anti-vaccination writings which she contends supports her bogus and dangerous claims.

This is an honest vaccination information site, Judy Wilyman's main point is that people should have the choice to make their own decision about vaccination, rather than being prosecuted/persecuted if they choose not to. The Australian government have actually asked the public to report to the police anyone who questions vaccinations! In a free society questions should be encouraged, but if vaccinations are questioned who does it hurt? The profits of the pharmaceutical companies ...

Dangerous website full of lies and propaganda directed against vaccines and vaccination. It's anti-science, anti-evidence and anti-medicine and it's a menace to public health and safety. Avoid this site if you value your health and your children's health. If you don't give a flying f*ck about either, slither head-first into the seething cesspool of lies, disinformation and derp that is Vaccination Decisions. Avoid like the plague.

This site attempts to legitimise one persons opinions on vaccination, attempting to dress it up as being "government immunisation policy" and "peer reviewed scientific literature" when it is demonstrably neither. The owner, Judy Wilyman, has been continually making derogatory remarks about a grieving family despite their ongoing requests for her to cease. Overall, a poor source of information, dressed up to look legitimate, whilst actively disgracing itself with implications of conspiracy.

Ms Wilyman's recent publications demonstrate her biased and unscholarly background. References below. WARNING You may be offended by the nature of her remarks about the parents of a dead infant in the article and the comments section. ***** *****

This is the site of a very active & notorious anti-vaccination campaigner. Her statement that the site gives a balanced view is untrue. The site gives misleading and untrue information about life-saving vaccines for dangerous childhood diseases. It is unbalanced and unscientific.