Is bolenreport.com Safe?

This website is full of scientific facts and peer reviewed independant research that makes big pharma very nervous because big pharma needs more then anything to keep you dumbed down and ignorant of the facts & peer-reviewed independant scientific literature. Because once you realize the lies and deception that big pharma has put on us then their profits suffer.

Dangerous quack site full of pseudo-science and disinformation. Every piece of alt-med woo gets a run here - cancer "cures", homeopathy, anti-vaccination, mercury causes autism, chelation, on and on and on, lies after lies, BS after BS, scam after scam. It's all mingled with a hefty dose of conspiracy theories and libellous attacks on real doctors. Whoever writes this stuff is clearly unhinged. AVOID!

It is not easy to go against popular opinion. We seem to place our destiny in the hands of of someone we trust. This trust may be real and authentic but misplaced because the trustee has been deceived. It is all about money for the guys at the top of the world order. Money and control. Honest Doctors go to school because they want to help people. The schools need funding and get it from pharmacist. Pharmacy are owned by world order control people. So now you have it.

I guess since they talk badly about the way WOT is being used to censor any opinion but their own the site automatically obtains a bad rating from WOT. Because the truth hurts I can see it being harmful to the new book burning society that has cropped up on the internet.

I was going to put it in my hall of shame just for bad design- and then I read some of the contents... It was loaded with conspiratorial anti-science and anti-vaccine bunk! It is a true shame that we are in the year 2013 and there still is a market for this kind of hogwash...

There is nothing bad/wrong with this site what so ever. It is NOT filled with misinformation or lies like so many others state here. It's quite obvious just who are the uninformed and uneducated with all the various modalities regarding alternative medicine. As someone who has practiced many years, I can personally tell you, most of them are very effective especially if used with proper methods and time frame. Before you poo poo these alternative medical sites, do some very heavy complete research with an open mind. You just may then find yourself being a 100% believer, not all bogus quackery at that!

Once again, WOT is being used to censor free speech, most likely by so called "quackbusters" (who are the biggest "quacks" of all). The site sells nothing, asks for no personal information, and places no cookies on your system, yet these folks claim it's very poor in areas it doesn't even engage in! Talk about close minded stupidity. Trustworthiness is the only category that can legitimately be rated for this site, and I don't doubt there may be some issues there. Enough to stifle free speech? I don't think so.

The criticisms are censorship, and they should be treated as such. Do your own research on vaccines, make up your own mind. Use your own judgment about the trustworthiness of any information about any medical procedure. You, and your child, are the ones who will bear the consequences. Not your doctor. Not the government. Not the pharmaceutical companies. And not people who try to tell you what information you should consider credible . . . including me.

All the users criticizing the site are either paid shills by their master (who Bolen reports on) or simply refuse to look outside the allopathic medical industry. The site has simply been given a negative rating by the usual anti-alternative health quacks who've made it their business to keep the public in the dark about innovative therapies.

I suspect the motives of some of the people who have evaluated this site. I fail to see what the evaluation has to do with vendor reliability (when nothing is being sold!), or with child safety. There is nothing here to harm a child who might view it, and children are unlikely to be interested in the contents, anyway. If the contention is that by mentioning an alternative approach to treating autism, the site is "harming children," I would answer that trying to stifle all information other than the standard views--which may one day change, as many other medical treatments have changed--people trying to keep others from viewing it may, indeed, be "harming children" themselves. I also cannot imagine how the site could be violating a viewer's privacy any more than most sites do that sell things and do put cookies on people's computers. This site doesn't even ask for viewers' names or email addresses. If the low ratings had been confined to "trustworthiness," that, at least, would be worthy of concern and more checking by the viewers. But as it is, these ratings make me suspicious. I generally like to check things out and feel that in matters like this, a bit of skepticism is always wise. But it cuts both ways. I have nothing but disdain for people and companies who fight dirty and, instead of openly arguing their cases, just give a site bad marks in hopes that it will deter others. Put your information out there, but don't try to stifle things you don't agree with. The public deserves a chance to sift through the information and make their own decisions. By the way, I came to this site through a link from a message on a forum whose information has enabled my husband to stay alive and well for several years now, his cancer shrunk to the point where an MRI is needed to be able to vizualize it, so I am extremely happy that I did have access to reliable information on alternative treatments. His allopathic doctors--all very fine and knowledgeable people--had said that all they could hope to do for his almost invariably fatal form of cancer was to put him through chemo and give him a few more months so he could "wind up his affairs". In my skepticism, I didn't really believe that things such as diet could save a cancer patient, but we followed the suggestions because nothing else offered any hope. Now I'm a believer, though I do realize that there is NO cancer treatment, allopathic or alternative, that is guaranteed to work in every case.

Inaccurate is too weak a word to describe this web page. Especially its description of the Amazing Meeting 2012. It was one of the more divided meetings in the history of the event, yet Bolen would have his readers believe that people were there to receive marching orders. Don't waste your time on this site.