Is daphnecaruanagalizia.com Safe?

Untrusted by WOT

Website security score

49%
WOT’s security score is based on our unique technology and community expert reviews.
Is this website claimed?
No
Community reviews
★ 2.9
WOT’s algorithm
58%
Child Safety
N/A

What does the community say?

Leave a review

How would you rate this website from 1 to 5?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Share your feedback and help the communityReviews must consist of at least 15 charactersChoose the tags that best describe this website
Malware or Viruses
Poor customer service
Phishing
Scam
Potentially illegal
Misleading or unethical
Privacy Risk
Suspicious
Hate, discrimination
Spam
Potential unwanted program
Ads / Pop-ups
Adult Content
Incidental nudity
Gruesome or shocking
Cancel
Post Review
2.9
starstarstarempty-starempty-star

Based on 10 reviews

Sort by:
Newest
The site owner was just murdered today by a car bomb. It's pretty obvious at this point that she made some very powerful people angry. And the only way to anger the powerful is with the truth. Otherwise they sue you and win in court. It's awful that her coverage of the Panama Papers (which are leaks based 100% in fact) got her killed. But it's now more important than ever to make sure her message gets out. We cannot allow thugs and murderers to shut the truth down.
Helpful
There is nothing wrong with the site. Negative rating is given by people who have different opinions and are intolerant to different views.
2
This site gives an alternative opinion. It is safe and clean
2
This is the lowest sort of website. It is dedicated to hate-mongering. I would give the example of the crass, tasteless celebration of the death of a political opponent on the very morning the death was announced. The site is full of scurrilous, unsubstantiated allegations of a personal nature, often made in order to warn dissenters off from saying anything negative about the site's proprietor. People's children, deceased family members are targeted specifically for the purpose of shutting up anyone who disagrees. On the whole a quite sickening, jaundiced, nasty little site which reflects the psychology of its owner.
4
Very good professional journalism!
3
The site seems clean and safe. Opinions on its content may vary, but that's not what these ratings should be about! Shame on who tries to black-list as "dangerous", "un-trust-worthy", etc. a site just because they disagree with its content. Note: as most sites with freely expressed opinions, it's definitely not 100% child-proof...
1
The site does not deserve sch a bad rating!
6
Hateful content: personal attacks under the disguise of 'journalism'.
4
apparently, because one criticizes in a heavy handed manner, others quickly take offence and try to discourage an ever increasing number of persons from reading this blog. Sorry but that is as devious as the trait they try to depict the blogger with.
5
REAL Journalism you don't get anywhere else. Toe-stepping is no concern.
4
Check If You’ve Been CompromisedConnect with Google to scan your browsing history.
Connect with Google
As seen on
By signing in, you agree to data collection and use as described in our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy
alternative-placeholder

About WOT

We reviewed more than 2 Million website and counting. WOT is a lightweight extension designed to help you browse quickly and securely. It will clean your browser, speed it up, and protect your private information.

Is this your website?

Claim your website to access WOT’s business tools and connect with your customers.
Claim This Website
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalization. By continuing, you agree to our cookie policy.
Accept