Is dinnerforthought.com Safe?

Unknown website

Website security score

37%
WOT’s security score is based on our unique technology and community expert reviews.
Is this website claimed?
No
Community reviews
★ 2.2
WOT’s algorithm
44%
Child Safety
N/A

What does the community say?

Leave a review

How would you rate this website from 1 to 5?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Share your feedback and help the communityReviews must consist of at least 15 charactersChoose the tags that best describe this website
Malware or Viruses
Poor customer service
Phishing
Scam
Potentially illegal
Misleading or unethical
Privacy Risk
Suspicious
Hate, discrimination
Spam
Potential unwanted program
Ads / Pop-ups
Adult Content
Incidental nudity
Gruesome or shocking
Cancel
Post Review
2.2
starstarempty-starempty-starempty-star

Based on 6 reviews

Sort by:
Newest
Scientifically validated information on real vaccine safety issues. For example the indisputable fact that the death rates of most diseases for which we are now vaccinated had dropped dramatically before vaccines were introduced.
Helpful
No facts on this website, just the usual recycled antivax lies, despite the fact that they've been debunked long ago. Just another blogger profiting by spreading fear and encouraging the spread of disease in the community. As always, sickness, injury and death result from these sort of antivax lies being propagated, but profit-driven sociopathic bloggers like this one just don't give a damn about the harm they cause.
Helpful
Losers, idiots and Big Pharma paid TROLLS negatively rate these health sites! If you can't agree with this valuable info., do us all a favor and eat a bullet BEFORE trolling on this site and WOT.
1
I don't use wot as in means of avoiding thoughts and content that don't line up with strangers. I will form my own opinion on what I read thank you. I use wot to know if a site will damage my computer with viruses, malware, adware, id theft etc. Anyone with half a brain realizes using wot as a means of showing you don't agree with something the author said is nothing more than a crude attempt at censorship and undermines the usefulness of the program for everyone. If I were the creator of wot I would block anyone who tries to lie about the safety of a site so they cannot damage my programs usefulness any further.
2
Just another self-edumacated anti-vax "researcher" who uses 200 words when ten will do. If you want actual in depth reading with the same length, pick up an actual science journal.
3
Ignore the ? WOT (Web Of Trust) rating. Drug industry trolls may again be trashing the WOT rating for a site that questions the safety and efficacy of vaccines. How much do they get paid to give bad WOT ratings to such sites as this?
2
Check If You’ve Been CompromisedConnect with Google to scan your browsing history.
Connect with Google
As seen on
By signing in, you agree to data collection and use as described in our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy
alternative-placeholder

About WOT

We reviewed more than 2 Million website and counting. WOT is a lightweight extension designed to help you browse quickly and securely. It will clean your browser, speed it up, and protect your private information.

Is this your website?

Claim your website to access WOT’s business tools and connect with your customers.
Claim This Website
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalization. By continuing, you agree to our cookie policy.
Accept