Is elixa.com Safe?

Trusted by WOT
Verified Website

Website security score

29%
WOT’s security score is based on our unique technology and community expert reviews.
Is this website claimed?
Yes
Community reviews
★ 1.4
WOT’s algorithm
29%
Child Safety
N/A

What does the community say?

Leave a review

How would you rate this website from 1 to 5?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Share your feedback and help the communityReviews must consist of at least 15 charactersChoose the tags that best describe this website
Malware or Viruses
Poor customer service
Phishing
Scam
Potentially illegal
Misleading or unethical
Privacy Risk
Suspicious
Hate, discrimination
Spam
Potential unwanted program
Ads / Pop-ups
Adult Content
Incidental nudity
Gruesome or shocking
Cancel
Post Review
1.4
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star

Based on 6 reviews

Sort by:
Newest
It is another site loaded with the most hokey and superstitious snake oil. This sort of thing is downright dangerous.
Helpful
Being a Health Pro involved many years with alternative-natural modalities I find it insultingly absurd to read such unbelievable comments left by obviously uninformed uneducated lay people with pure lack of actual knowledge base what so ever or true factual research. That being said, I've just ordered several items from this supposedly bad website without hesitation BUT with full knowledge OF WHAT & WHY I'M DOING SO!. People do your own individual research and then act accordingly "Healthy Smiles"
Helpful
It is sad to see people make negative comments when they do not know a thing about the PEMF science or products. WOT NEEDS TO DO A BETTER JOB OF VETTING COMMENTS FROM THOSE WITH ZERO SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE. THIS IS A GOOD SITE!!!
1
The ONLY negative comment about this site states nothing about child safety, privacy, vendor reliability or trustworthiness. The only thing the comment does is state an opinion about the effectiveness of alternative medicine and specifically, colloidal silver. The comment speaks in broad, general terms. It's one thing to have an opinion. It's another to use your opinion to degrade someone's business when you've never dealt with them or used the product.
1
Colloidal silver and related products have found wide use in mainstream medicine for a very long time. Much scientific research backs up the claims. See ***** for a recent study. For details on how medicine uses silver, see ***** Curad puts it in bandages. Do you call them on their ethics? "Dubious scientific quality" indeed. Check your facts before you accuse others of having ethical issues. Ethics involves fairness and objectivity, qualities which you seem to lack. As far as the suit you cited, a judge in California threw it out of court. It came from the notorious Dr. Stephen Barrett. See ***** for a detailed expose of this scamster and shill for Big Pharma. He uses a tort mill to generate slews of cases designed to coerce money from those with whom he and Big Pharma disagree. Read up on nuisance or harassment suits. We live in a country that has a legal system in which one is innocent until proven guilty. Getting sued does not prove guilt. Elixa sells a number of products that people can use experimentally. If the product does not meet expectations, the customer can return it for a refund. Elixa does not diagnose or claim to treat or cure diseases. In business for well over 20 years, with thousands of happy customers, it seems unfair that one negative review can tarnish a well-earned reputation for excellent products and customer service.
1
Selling items of dubious scientific quality including the usual suspects like colloidal silver, LED light therapy, etc. Overpromises more than most sites of these kind, including quoting wikipedia on the 'benefits' of Colloidal Silver without including that all important first line: 'Silver is also promoted within alternative medicine in the form of colloidal silver, although it has not been shown to be safe or effective.[1]' This site promotes the sale of items that are either proven to not work at all, or have ambiguous benefits at best. Who profits? The site owners. I don't consider a vendor selling products that don't work as trustworthy. They have also been sued by the NCAHF in the past for misleading marketing tactics: *****
3
Check If You’ve Been CompromisedConnect with Google to scan your browsing history.
Connect with Google
As seen on
By signing in, you agree to data collection and use as described in our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy
alternative-placeholder

About WOT

We reviewed more than 2 Million website and counting. WOT is a lightweight extension designed to help you browse quickly and securely. It will clean your browser, speed it up, and protect your private information.
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalization. By continuing, you agree to our cookie policy.
Accept