Is insideclimatenews.org Safe?

Trusted by WOT

Website security score

63%
WOT’s security score is based on our unique technology and community expert reviews.
Is this website claimed?
No
Community reviews
★ 3.7
WOT’s algorithm
74%
Child Safety
N/A

What does the community say?

Leave a review

How would you rate this website from 1 to 5?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Share your feedback and help the communityReviews must consist of at least 15 charactersChoose the tags that best describe this website
Malware or Viruses
Poor customer service
Phishing
Scam
Potentially illegal
Misleading or unethical
Privacy Risk
Suspicious
Hate, discrimination
Spam
Potential unwanted program
Ads / Pop-ups
Adult Content
Incidental nudity
Gruesome or shocking
Cancel
Post Review
3.7
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star

Based on 2 reviews

Sort by:
Newest
Site does not allow for users to confront misinformation presented in the articles. So, basically it's just a content mill to get ignorant people to donate. Everybody wants an easy explanation for climate change, but it's a BIG BIG topic that even the best of scientists cannot fully understand. The unfortunate truth (after months of research) is that the only solution to climate change is to reduce the human population down to 10% and then wait another 50 years for the earth to gradually recover. However, the amount of energy it would take to accomplish this (major WWIII) would drive climate change up at an unprecedented rate which would result in the need to wait 100 years for the earth to recover. However, given the current technology to provide food and medication, by that time the world population would have, again, increased to the point where climate change would be uncontrollable. Then, even if this were remotely possible, it would only account for the human contribution to climate change. It may be that human contribution to climate change is minimal compared to other "natural" events. So, then, why report the problem as one caused by humans? This takes us back to social media and "where the money is", politics, etc. So, like I said, it's really, really complicated. I welcome you to read the articles, but unless you have contributed at least 1 hour per day for at least a year of unbiased study, don't think you are ready to formulate an opinion on climate change. But here are a few topics to consider: Local climate Global climate Temperature change vs heat absorption Air temperature vs ocean temperature Ocean surface temperature vs deep water temperature Transport of heat via air (jetstreams) vs transport of heat via ocean currents Weather oscillations - yearly vs every 6 years vs every every 30 years vs ??? Politics: How do people profit from climate change? How do universities get money for research? How old and experienced are the children who create the articles you read? Control: How do governments use fear to control the masses? How might they leverage off of fear of climate change to control you? "Natural" causes of climate change: Coal mines burning in China Methane production from cattle Irreversible actions of the past: Atmospheric testing of nuclear bombs It goes on and on and on... You have no idea!
Helpful
It is an excellent green site. Of course if you worship the Koch Brothers you aren't gonna like it...
Helpful
Check If You’ve Been CompromisedConnect with Google to scan your browsing history.
Connect with Google
As seen on
By signing in, you agree to data collection and use as described in our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy
alternative-placeholder

About WOT

We reviewed more than 2 Million website and counting. WOT is a lightweight extension designed to help you browse quickly and securely. It will clean your browser, speed it up, and protect your private information.

Is this your website?

Claim your website to access WOT’s business tools and connect with your customers.
Claim This Website
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalization. By continuing, you agree to our cookie policy.
Accept