Is krxd.net Safe?

ORDURES aux Sites totalement ILLÉGAUX, aux mentions légales erronées, en WHOIS caché comme d'habitude chez les ESCROCS qui balancent des POURRIELS à répétition pour du PHISHING puis du SCAM ! A FUIR immédiatement de telles raclures de bidet... GARBAGES in the TOTALLY ILLEGAL Sites, without any legal notice, in WHOIS hidden as usual at the SWINDLERS which rocks repeated SPAMS for the PHISHING then the SCAM ! To RUN AWAY FROM immediately such scrapings of bidet ... SCHMUTZ in den völlig UNGESETZLICHEN Websiten, ohne eine gesetzliche Erwähnung, im versteckten WHOIS wie gewöhnlich bei den BETRÜGERN, die POURRIELS in Wiederholung für den PHISHING dann SCAM schaukelt ! Sofort solche Späne von Bidet zu VERMEIDEN... МУСОР в полностью НЕЗАКОННЫХ участках, без любого юридического уведомления, в WHOIS, скрытом как обычно в ЖУЛИКАХ, который трясет повторный SPAMS для PHISHING затем ЖУЛЬНИЧЕСТВО ! ИЗБЕГАТЬ немедленно таких очисток биде.... 垃圾中的完全非法的站点，而不受任何法律通告，在 WHOIS 中隐藏的象往常, 的岩石 重复 SPAMS 的网络钓鱼然后骗局 ！ 为避免（逃亡）立即这样的 scrapings 的坐浴盆...

spam source ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** krxd.net BravoNext S.A. – CHE-115.704.228 – Vicolo de’ Calvi 2, 6830, Chiasso, Svizzera. *****

Through the use of Ghostery, I conclude that this domain belongs to Krux Digital. "Krux delivers a cloud-based data management platform that helps companies protect, manage, and monetize consumer data across all digital screens and sources." About Us: ***** Website: ***** Privacy Policy: ***** Data Collected: Anonymous (Browser Information, Date/Time, Page Views , Serving Domains) Pseudonymous (IP Address (EU PII)) Data Sharing: Data is not shared with 3rd parties. Data Retention: Undisclosed Source for my info: *****

Ran into this on thesaurus.com, further research shows it to be owned by ***** who is owned by *****. In 3 years there has been 665 complaints filed with the ***** for web.com ***** Is absolutely disgusting and horrible in every single way. In no way do I want anything, cookie, beacon, or otherwise of theirs to interact with anything I own, E.G. my computer. They make me physically ill.

This is a script server website. There is no advertising page at this URL, but that does not mean it is not an active website as it is serving scripts to its client's websites. My preference is to block any third party scripts that are not required to display the client's website content. I use Firefox and NoScript. As there is no HTML webpage, this URL is not suitable for children.

On 08/10/2013, JackE1930 said: "What, this site gets a highly negative rating based on 2 votes? If there are many more votes saying that this is a bad site, why aren't the number of votes posted to show that a lot of people have had a bad experience. In fact why isn't it required for voters to leave some kind of comment of why they voted the way they did. I'm still not finding these ratings entirely trust worthy. Note: I tried going out to this website and found that it doesn't even exist any longer. " JackE1930, I understand that when fellow users don't add a comment specifying their decisions those decisions can't carry nearly as much weight as when they do. I wish everyone would, every time; but, that's probably not going to happen. We can still enjoy what data we do get, for free, from our fellow WOT members, though. As for the company's website no longer existing, and yet it's traffic-tracking software still working away on this many other websites: this raises the -biggest- alarm in my mind!

What, this site gets a highly negative rating based on 2 votes? If there are many more votes saying that this is a bad site, why aren't the number of votes posted to show that a lot of people have had a bad experience. In fact why isn't it required for voters to leave some kind of comment of why they voted the way they did. I'm still not finding these ratings entirely trust worthy. Note: I tried going out to this website and found that it doesn't even exist any longer.