Is realfarmacy.com Safe?

This site is suspicious

2.6
starstarhalf-starempty-starempty-star
(49 Reviews)
Misleading or unethical
Suspicious
Claim this site
Ask our community
Share:

realfarmacy.com

2.6
starstarhalf-starempty-starempty-star
(49 Reviews)
Protect Your Phone
1. Get alerts about unsafe websites.
2. Block adult content.
3. Stay safe on the go.
Share your thoughts...
starempty-star
Poor
starempty-star
Fair
starempty-star
Average
starempty-star
Good
starempty-star
Excellent
49 Reviews by the community
Sort by:
Newest
Jan 21, 2020
starstarstarstarempty-star
Realfarmacy is being targeted by big-pharma/petrochem/agriculture for spreading viable alternatives to mainstream's exploitative addictive slavery and subjugation ... take note of the fake-fake-news hysteria by paid for trolls; who cannot supply substantial-factual-unbiased info to discredit ... therefore RF website tagged with slander of "misleading, unethical, suspicious."
Helpful
Sep 3, 2018
starstarstarstarstar
An excellent site! Excellent information regarding modern day health issues.
Helpful
Mar 31, 2018
#FakeNews many articles are old articles posted as new , out of context.
Helpful
1
Sep 20, 2017
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
This website is well known for "alternative medicine" and conspiracy theories, including anti-vaccination movement, which is far more dangerous to health than any sweeteners, which is one of the topics they're promoting. As it comes to this particular article on sweeteners that has drawn my attention, they are quiting real data but manipulating their outcomes. For example, from the first cited research paper: "When the 2 cohorts were combined, there was no significant association between soda intake and risks of NHL and multiple myeloma." The second research paper was re-evaluated with the following conclusion: "The increased incidence of lymphomas/leukaemias reported in treated rats was unrelated to aspartame, given the high background incidence of chronic inflammatory changes in the lungs and the lack of a positive dose–response relationship" There is much more of research demonstrating lack of cancirogenic effect of aspartame, which is the reason why it's not being banned - there's not scientific evidence to do this. The website on the other hand is cherry-picking papers that fit their agenda, and completely ignore anything that contradicts their views. So indeed, do your own research - but use PubMed rather than conspiracy websites.
Helpful
1
Sep 5, 2016
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
This site passes on loads of BS quack cure info. It is a major source of medical misinformation all propagated to be clickbait.
Helpful
1
starstarstarstarstar
Good site. Safe for the kids. This website is in no way malicious or obscene. I disagree with a lot of what they say here, but I also agree with a lot. I'm giving this a trustworthy rating because the stuff I agree with, mostly the anti-Pharma stance needs to be heard. Did anyone bother to read the disclamer at the bottom or is everyone simply pro-GMOs? While no site is perfect, it's a shame that professional trolls are allowed to continually smear ideologically-opposed or competitor websites. It is really undermining the intent and effectiveness of WOT. I Trust this website, but I also take each story with a grain of salt. Still, this website is worth checking out.
Helpful
Apr 16, 2016
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
The site promotes unscientific alarmist articles.
Helpful
1
Mar 7, 2016
starstarstarstarhalf-star
Natural medicine works, people discrediting them for not being experienced are incorrect in this matter. I can tell you from experience that nature (where all medicine comes from) works!
Helpful
1
Feb 19, 2016
starstarstarstarstar
I disagree with a lot of what they say here, but I also agree with a lot. I'm giving this a trustworthy rating because the stuff I agree with, mostly the anti-Pharma stance needs to be heard. The anti-vax stance bothers me, but I see a dangerous trend in demonizing people you disagree with. Giving an untrustworthy rating because you disagree with them is just wrong.  If we want to fight their arguments lets just use facts and not try censorship. Censorship actually gives credence to conspiracy theories.
Helpful
1
Jan 22, 2016
starstarstarstarhalf-star
It has interesting information on alternative medicine. Some may not agree to everything that's posted but sure that's just a matter of opinion and everyone is entitled to their opinion
Helpful
1
Dec 29, 2015
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Site is misleading. They try to make it look dangerous to be vaccinated. people who rely on this information put themselves at risk of diseases that varies in severity.
Helpful
Dec 25, 2015
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
This website could get people killed. Their irresponsible and refuted clams of "cures," especially for cancer, could cause desperate people to forego legitimate but expensive treatments that work for teas and make believe that would let the cancer kill them. The anti-vaccine garbage is inexcusable. NOT SAFE FOR CHILDREN
Helpful
2
Dec 19, 2015
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Another web site for the tinfoil hat crowd. I think the "stories" are nothing more than the author's dreams/fantasies written down.
Helpful
1
Jun 14, 2015
starstarstarstarstar
While no site is perfect, it's a shame that professional trolls are allowed to continually smear ideologically-opposed or competitor websites. It is really undermining the intent and effectiveness of WOT. Most of the yellow-red indicators and negative comments that I've run across lately, including here, seem to be nothing more than whiny, dis-informative hit-pieces. I actually took the time to research 5 random articles here and I found all five to be factual and reasonably objective. Sure, alternative medicine should be met with healthy skepticism because it has its fair share of cons and scams, but major pharmaceuticals are no innocent angels either.
Helpful
2
Jun 12, 2015
starstarhalf-starempty-starempty-star
The legal disclaimer sums it up. "Legal Disclaimer This site and the information referenced and herein does not constitute an attempt to practice medicine. Use of the site does not establish a doctor-patient relationship. Individuals should consult a qualified health care provider for medical advice and answers to personal health questions. While the site attempts to be as accurate as possible, it should not be relied upon as being comprehensive or error-free. The information presented on this web site is not intended to take the place of your personal physician’s advice and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. Discuss this information with your own physician or healthcare provider to determine what is right for you. All information is intended for your general knowledge only and is not a substitute for medical advice or treatment for specific medical conditions. We can not and do not give you medical advice. The information contained in this online site and emails is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge. The information should not be considered complete and should not be used in place of a visit, call, consultation or advice of your physician or other health care provider. We do not recommend the self-management of health problems. Information obtained through REALfarmacy.com is not exhaustive and does not cover all diseases, ailments, physical conditions or their treatment. Should you have any health care-related questions, call or see your physician or other health care provider promptly. You should never disregard medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read here." Basically, don't trust us, we are unqualfied to talk about this stuff.
Helpful
3
May 19, 2015
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Germ theory denialism, conspiracy theories, detox nonsense, cancer woo. A good site for filling in an anti-science BINGO card but worthless for anything else.
Helpful
3
Apr 28, 2015
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
--- This website promotes false health information * Conspiracy theories * Anti vaccination * Unscientific information * Pseudoscience * Their legal disclaimer on the top says : "for entertainment purposes only.""
Helpful
3
Mar 13, 2015
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Promotes untested medical theories which could lead people to quackery, and reject evidence based medicine, leading to unnecessary sickness or death.
Helpful
3
Jan 25, 2015
starstarhalf-starempty-starempty-star
The site is a nest of preposterous conspiracy theories -- the most dangerous of which involve convincing people not to vaccinate their children. The site appears to be safe to browse based on McAfee Site Advisor and other similar sources. My Suspicious rating is for the IQ-draining content of the anti-vaxxer disease cult, but not any malware that will infect my computer. In order to protect your children from infection, though, you might want to educate everyone you know about the dangers of the FUD spread on sites like this one.
Helpful
4
Dec 24, 2014
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Much like NaturalNews, which seems to form a substantial portion of the article references, this is a conglomeration of all manner of health, medicine, corporate and government conspiracy. A full reading of the articles reveals that the One True Cause of autism, cancer, obesity and every other disease known to man is fluoride. And wheat. And pesticides. And GM food, food additives, cell phones, toxins and vaccines. The Do it Yourself and Grow it Yourself sections might well have some reasonable and useful advice, but anything relating to the above topics is probably only useful as an insight into the minds of conspiracy theorists. Do not take anything written here as gospel without checking the claims with rbutr, or making a similar comparison.
Helpful
3
«
123
»

About this site

Share this: Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Pinterest Share on Tumblr Share on Google+ Share on Linkedin Share on Reddit !Share

Trustworthiness
53
/100
Child Safety
61
/100