Is thedoctorwithin.com Safe?

Suspicious website

Website security score

36%
WOT’s security score is based on our unique technology and community expert reviews.
Is this website claimed?
No
Community reviews
★ 2.1
WOT’s algorithm
43%
Child Safety
N/A

What does the community say?

Leave a review

How would you rate this website from 1 to 5?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Share your feedback and help the communityReviews must consist of at least 15 charactersChoose the tags that best describe this website
Malware or Viruses
Poor customer service
Phishing
Scam
Potentially illegal
Misleading or unethical
Privacy Risk
Suspicious
Hate, discrimination
Spam
Potential unwanted program
Ads / Pop-ups
Adult Content
Incidental nudity
Gruesome or shocking
Cancel
Post Review
2.1
starstarempty-starempty-starempty-star

Based on 13 reviews

Sort by:
Newest
This doctor keeps saying that he is not an anti vaccine guy and he belives in real honest vaccines that work. Then he continues bashing vaccine and says that there has never been a safty check for any vaccine. Therefore he really does not belive in any vaccine he just does not like to admit it. There are some useful information on his site and he is a good lecturer but he could easily comfuse and misslead people about vaccine and endanger public.
Helpful
Medical disinformation, quackery, and a complete lack of ethics. NO medical professional with a shred of conscience does telephone consultations or provides fake medical exemption certificates for anti-vaccine fanatics.
1
This website has very interesting information for people researching on different kinds of ways for treating illness. The real reason this site has a horrible rating is because there are paranoid people who just visit just to give a quick negative rating, without the use of logic.
Helpful
When will the insincere attempts at CENSORING ever end?! When a site doesn't sell anything and does not ask for a single item of personal information, how can there be any question of rating "vendor reliability" or "privacy"? The very fact that the site in question here has been given figures of 28 and 31 for those 2 items is a clear indication that certain people are deliberately and skewing the ratings. Their motives are suspect. The way to combat erroneous ideas is not to stamp out the freedom to do research, but to argue with good reasons and proofs for your own position! I find this particular site reasonable and very informative. Its arguments make sense. My husband got rid of liver cancer (It took several years, but there were no metastases, and in case anyone is scoffing that it probably wasn't really cancer: the diagnosis was arrived at by MRI and a liver biopsy.), with no allopathic treatments at all, only by following the Budwig Protocol. That protocol, by the way, prohibits artificially-derived supplements, allowing only the type that you might call "whole-food," such as herbs, seeds, powdered foods, and the like. It is vegetarian and relies on an emulsion of flax seed oil and cottage cheese, fresh foods, sunbathing, rest, and moderate exercise--none of which is at all harmful. I didn't believe in alternative medicine at one time, and my husband went to the Budwig Protocol only in desperation, having been told that chemo and the like would only buy him a few months to 'wind up his affairs'. But now, having him alive and feeling good quite few years later, I am a believer. It is an outrage that anyone would try to suppress the information about vitamins on this site.
2
If you are at all interested in your own health, then this site must be highly recommended!
2
Dr Tim O'Shea writes excellent medical comment, particularly on the subject of immunology and is a highly regarded speaker on the subject. A poor ranking here must be suspected to be the work of major pharmaceutical companies, whose extreme profitability could be affected by what the docter has to say. Just go to his site and look up the article on Swine Flu A.H.Munger
2
Very helpful website. This is yet another site poorly rated based on some people's opinions of the subject matter rather than than the safety of the site/content. If you are only willing to believe in allopathic remedies offered by Big Pharma and the doctors they train, and that no natural forms of healing ever took place for the thousands of years before Big Pharma came along, then this website is not for you. But if you are willing to believe that their are many natural alternatives, you may find this site useful as so many others have found.
3
I suppose I can see people who are staunch believers in allopathic being confused and frightened by this website. For anyone that bothers to do actual research, I would consider this site to be a useful resource, among many other resources.
4
This site is both safe and informative. Ignore the first rating that was placed via a mass rating tool.
5
Tim O’Shea is a serious researcher, his views are not mainstream by any means, but then ... mainstream isn't the only place where progress in understanding the workings of the human organism can fluorish.
6
Highly recommended for non-mainstream critical information.
7
the article is all about the evidence
8
Bizarre claims about vaccination. Lacking evidence. Hazardous for health, especially for children.
8
Check If You’ve Been CompromisedConnect with Google to scan your browsing history.
Connect with Google
As seen on
By signing in, you agree to data collection and use as described in our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy
alternative-placeholder

About WOT

We reviewed more than 2 Million website and counting. WOT is a lightweight extension designed to help you browse quickly and securely. It will clean your browser, speed it up, and protect your private information.

Is this your website?

Claim your website to access WOT’s business tools and connect with your customers.
Claim This Website
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalization. By continuing, you agree to our cookie policy.
Accept