Is wikipedia.org Safe?

Considered safe by WOT

4.7
starstarstarstarhalf-star
(665 Reviews)
Good site
Opinions, religion, politics
Alt. or controversial medicine
Popular
Claim this site
Share:
Share your thoughts...
K
starempty-star
Poor
starempty-star
Fair
starempty-star
Average
starempty-star
Good
starempty-star
Excellent
665 Reviews by the community
Sort by:
Newest
The most trustworthy online protection
m
2 weeks ago
Helpful
·
Report
n
a month ago
Helpful
·
Report
a
a month ago
Электронная энциклопедия можно узнать и подчеркнуть много информации
Helpful
·
Report
c
Feedback community
Helpful
·
Report
3 months ago
Helpful
·
Report
5 months ago
Отличный сайт для поиска информации.
Helpful
·
Report
e
5 months ago
Great source for infomarion.
Helpful
·
Report
K
6 months ago
Very well maintained site. Most information is correct, but do take it with a grain of salt as it is crowdsourced. Great privacy practices as far as I'm aware.
Helpful
·
Report
b
7 months ago
BACKEND RECOVER @ RESCUE TEAM . COM services are one of a kind. I came across their contact in my search for help recovering my stolen coin, and it was helpful. I invested $50,000 worth of coins with Coin-Flip 3 months ago but they ripped me off the return of investment and the investment capital as well. Thanks to the rescue team for recovering my money back. You can use their help should you find yourself in a similar situation.
Helpful
·
Report
m
8 months ago
Have some people who needs to hear this. If you have lost your investment trying investing or purchasing anything with any brokers company website and traders, kindly contact watchdogmoneyback@aol.com . They helped me recovered mine.
Helpful
·
Report
9 months ago
Popular wiki website
Helpful
·
Report
9 months ago
Amazing source of trustworthy information!
Helpful
·
Report
f
9 months ago
Good but not for formal articles
Helpful
·
Report
10 months ago
Great source for info!
Helpful
·
Report
A
11 months ago
What was conceived as a magnificent goal, a free library of humanity-valuable information that anyone can faithfully edit, is unfortunately marred by site owner biases, resulting in an unacceptable amount of articles that, taken on their own and with no other information, result in misleading conclusions and obvious biases. For just one of thousands of examples, "The Last of Us Part II", though widely regarded by audiences as being inferior to its predecessor and having a non-Metacritic-altered Metacritic user score below 5/10, is stated as having "universal acclaim" from critics with this severe audience rating barely mentioned and dismissed as "review bombing", even though the score was still non-positive after MetaCritic removed review bomb ratings (evidence: https://web.archive.org/web/20211117171403/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_of_Us_Part_II). Further numerous and concrete examples of "Wikipedia bias" can easily be found with an online search. Wikipedia is (like some of your school teachers may have stated), not a valid objective source, and should not be relied on by itself for accurate information. Reading its content by itself will provide an inaccurate picture of real world events, definitions, people, and places. It is a shame to see what could have been such a valuable database of information, corrupted by personal site-owner biases that a true scholar would absolutely never copy into their work.
Helpful
·
Report
1 year ago
Propaganda site, don't believe everything they tell you.
Helpful
·
Report
1 year ago
Не всегда актуальная и свежая информация. Очень много полезной информации wikipedia выручает во многом
Helpful
·
Report
1 year ago
Свободная энциклопедия на многих языках. Содержит множество информации, которая может быть как полезной, так и не достоверной. Но он постоянно улучшается и развивается.
Helpful
·
Report
r
ااسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته شركة حوسيال ذات مصداقية جيدة ولا عندنا اي شك في منتوجاته الاعلانية
Helpful
·
Report
s
1 year ago
جوسيال بوابتك الحقيقية وطريقك الصحيح
Helpful
·
Report
«
123
...
34
»

About this site

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.

Trustworthiness
94
/100
Child Safety
94
/100
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy
Accept