Is www.christiananswers.net Safe?

Site does not reflect Christian values. Beware of wolf in sheep's clothing. By compromising Christian values this site makes it an easy slide into worldly value system. Better just to read your bible, pray, and ask God for wisdom. I am a Christian. Jesus is Lord. Don't up-rate this site just because they say they have Christian values. You need to REALLY read the articles and think about how they mislead people with worldly watered down concepts.

They mix modern science and Bible concepts to try to "prove" the garden of Eden was not in Iraq. The Bible describes the location of the garden of Eden and the location falls in Iraq. Just because these people hate the Iraq people doesn't mean that they should try and change biblical truth to undermine them. Muslim or not, the garden of Eden was located in that area. We don't need to try and pretend that the Tigris and Euphrates rivers moved just to undermine the Iraq people. I am a Christian, and I choose to love Muslims, becase my God tells me to love them.

Aweful site promoting ignorance whilst begging for money. E.g. the dishonest alteration of the 2nd law of thermodynamics to fit in with anti-science propaganda; this stood out like a sore thumb. Keep kids away unless you want them to fail at school and beyond.

This is just another in the seemingly endless flood of websites and other media propaganda, which, if successful, will drag all of humanity back to a new Dark Age from which, given the high tech measures required to extract the remaining resources which would be needed to rebuild our civilization -- humanity might never recover. It is past time for humanity to wake up and put ALL religions where they belong among the myths, fairy tales, and horror stories of humanity's childhood.

This page is dishonest and it's simply lying. Biologists know for a fact that the same hox genes produce the same structures in fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. The person who wrote this web page not only lies about these structures, but tries to give the impression that these are outmoded ideas in the greater scientific community.