Le site absoluterights.com est-il sûr ?

I'm beginning to wonder if WOT really cares about user's ratings, or if they exist solely to bash conservative; family-friendly; stand up for American Constitutional Rights people. This is a GOOD site, & like many others have posted, almost everyone who rated this site gave it ALL GREEN...meaning it's safe from malware, trojans, spam, pornography, criminal activity, etc. WHY, THEN, DOES WOT STILL GIVE IT THE "RED CIRCLE" TELLING EVERYONE IT'S "DANGEROUS"???? This seems to be a pattern of WOT & I wonder if it's WOT being pressured by "special interest groups" to assign poor or dangerous ratings to conservative sites or, even worse...does WOT have its own agenda? I'm not fond of being manipulated or lied to & I'm getting a strong feeling that there's more to WOT than what we're being told. I ask WOT ***** you really care about keeping malicious sites from harming people or do you just want people looking for traditional, family friendly, conservative views from finding others who believe the same way? It's time for WOT to speak up AND to review the comments made by WOT members on this & similar sites...then give sites the TRUE rating. It's time for the Truth! I'm fed-up with being told I have to "tolerate" opposing thoughts & views, when those who think otherwise don't have to tolerate MY views! TOLERANCE IS A TWO-WAY STREET, EVERYONE; FUNNY HOW ONLY THE CONSERVATIVE SIDE OF THE STREET IS THE SIDE THAT'S ALWAYS BLOCKED OFF!!!

REQUIRES PARENTAL DISCRETION! PARENTAL SUPERVISION REQUIRED: FOR ALL YOUNG ADULTS UNDER the AGES> 35-45 yrs.!!! If Your Parents have passed over? Check with ALL your Personal Personal Family Mentors. Please! Problematically Objectionable to: Citizens Not Prepared for Emergencies, Socialist & extreme Liberals. Two complaints: -lots of emails & very hard time getting videos to work with a Mac: All info.: pertinent, informative. Soon to be 66- It's proved to be TMI ! My COMPETENCE WITH: ISP, IT, Mac, DSL, etc. is woefully inadequate. Not sure 'bout spamming? SurvivalLife.com, constant email partner of the group. Not sure, after a few years, who else. Again, lots of emails! Again: Lots of email, Good Info.! DPT (WOT's -Josh McCord)

Only thing wrong with this site is the Left wing NUTS hate the truth and this site reports the TRUTH. They want you to be brain washed ROBOTS like they are and they want only THEIR points of view out there so they give ALL these sites a bad rep to try to keep you from hearing the truth. I have used this site for a LONG time and they have NEVER spammed, had virus issues or ANYTHING else that is bad or harmful. Well unless you want to be lied to all your life, then I guess this would be harmful to your AGENDA!

I really Don't understand how this WOT works. After reading all of the comments there is scarcely any negative comments at all. So why does this site have a negative warning? I opened the site and found nothing that merits a warning, not even a little. The content was slightly interesting, but certainly harmless. So the WOT warnings seem to be a waste of energy and of a very specific political bend, that is disappointing.

Useful, Informative, Entertaining, Good Customer Experience, and Child Friendly!!! Yes, this website is all of these!!! Absolute ***** must scare those who may have a fear of and/or animus towards individualism, individual freedom/liberty, self-sufficiency, personal accountability/responsibility. The concepts of limited government at the consent of the governed, and the rule of law may be issues that are also disliked by those who disapprove of this website and it's principles. This website should have green circles for all rating factors!

There's absolutely nothing on this site that should warrant it to have a rating of "Poor". Since when did informing people of their Constitutional rights become a bad thing. WOT needs to be honest & get it right. Otherwise, what's the purpose in even using WOT.

I have seen questionable negative ratings for both right- and left-leaning sites, which I see as the result of extremists from both ends having nothing better to do than to repeatedly make negative ratings in attempts to prevent free discussion. I'll bet they would be the first ones to claim they "really" believe in democracy, too.