Le site breitbart.com est-il sûr ?

La confiance de WOT

Score de sécurité du site web

77%
Le score de sécurité de WOT est basé sur notre technologie unique et sur les avis des experts de la communauté.
Ce site est-il revendiqué ?
Non
Avis de la Communauté
★ 4
L'algorithme de WOT
81%
Sécurité pour les Enfants
80%

Que dit la communauté ?

Laisser un commentaire

Quelle note entre 1 et 5 donneriez-vous à ce site ?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Faites part de vos commentaires et aidez la communautéLes commentaires doivent comporter au moins 15 caractèresChoisissez les tags qui décrivent le mieux ce site web
Logiciels malveillants ou virus
Mauvais service client
Hameçonnage
Escroquerie
Potentiellement illégal
Fallacieux ou contraire à l’éthique
Risques relatifs à la confidentialité
Suspect
Haine, discrimination
Escroquerie
Programme potentiellement indésirable
Publicités / fenêtres pop-up
Contenu pour adultes
Nudité accidentelle
Violent ou choquant
Annuler
Publier le commentaire
4
starstarstarstarempty-star

Basé sur 103 avis

Classer par :
Le plus récent
This is a pseudo-news site that offers political disinformation, pseudoscience, rumor, conspiracy and extremely biased opinion-based articles. The site is a deliberate attempt to manufacture political disinformation instead of reporting news in a factual manner with little or no bias. The site provides a platform for anonymous commenters who promote and amplify known conspiracy theories, disinformation, etc. and is not a reliable source of information whatsoever. This site continually fails fact-checks and is fraudulent in its intentions. See: ***** ***** ***** ***** A wise person would avoid this site – untrustworthy.
14
Truthful and accurate. A good source of FACTUAL information.
Utile
This is a safe site. No malware, I think that WOT safety ratings are being abused for political reasons. I look to WOT to tell me if visiting a certain website is dangerous for my computer. WOT should add a rating for actually safe or dangerous sites FOR MY COMPUTER and another rating for I'M TRYING TO CENSOR THIS WEBSITE FOR ITS POLITICAL VIEWS.
Utile
Excellent source of misinformation. Numerous failed fact checks almost all related to extreme right political propaganda. Loyal comrades here. The quality and reliability of this source has fallen precipitously since Andrew Breitbart's death.
2
Biased alt-right web page with misinformation.
2
Excellent source of news. Breitbart was founded by Andrew Breitbart who was not afraid of telling the truth no matter how much the Government & the Media Industrial Complex hated him for it. Sadly he is not around anymore as he passed away March 1, 2012.
Utile
No political correctness or censorship. It is a real journalism.
1
If WOT is going to be used to rate sites based on political affiliations, then it will lose its credibility. Breitbart is a web site that is unashamedly right leaning on the political playground. The Left will hate it, the Right will love it. But Wot is not here to serve any political agenda.
3
Dreadful site pedalling far-right misinformation, pseudo-science and extremist views - not to be trusted!
5
Objective, trustworthy news site.
1
Conservative 5 star news site.
1
Right wing disinformation and incitement to violence
3
It's a website which promotes lies, hatred and fascism. I really don't want to exist such websites based on lies, false and biased information
3
Breitbart carries out right-wing misinformation campaigns.
3
It's a shame that such a bad site as Breitbart can influence American politics ( better said Trump ). In a free country like the USA ( ???? ) you can't censor this unfortunately. But the site spreads fake news, rumour, lies, gossip and deliberate disinformation for the sake of politics and money.
4
Disinformation at its worst. Pure hate speech.
3
If WOT is going to be used to rate sites based on political affiliations, then it will lose its credibility. Breitbart is a web site that is unashamedly right leaning on the political playground. The Left will hate it, the Right will love it. But Wot is not here to serve any political agenda.
1
Almost as bad as inforwars
3
Breitbart came to existence sometime during the 90s or early 2000’s as a conservative way to convolute every message that has to do with politics, women’s health, and just about anything you can think of. I read them before anyone else even knew they existed and found that they did things like go undercover to underhandedly trick certain organizations into looking bad. This was on the news all over the place and I’m sure someone there has heard about it and the things that followed. Breitbart is full of misrepresentations and missed leading if not out right lies and as such should not be given a good review by anyone who actually cares about America instead of just one party and there anti-everything stance
6
I don't know how this site can have a green rating. It is complete propaganda, makes no sense, and is wildly unethical.
5
12345
...
6
Vérifiez si vous avez été compromisConnectez-vous à Google pour analyser votre historique de navigation.
Se connecter avec Google
Tel que vu sur
En vous connectant, vous acceptez la collecte et l'utilisation des données telles qu'elles sont décrites dans notre site web. Conditions d'utilisation et Politique de Confidentialité
alternative-placeholder

À propos de WOT

Nous avons passé en revue plus de 2 millions de sites web et ce n'est pas fini. WOT est une extension légère conçue pour vous aider à naviguer rapidement et en toute sécurité. Il nettoie votre navigateur, l'accélère et protège vos informations privées.

C'est votre site ?

Réclamez votre site web pour accéder aux outils commerciaux de WOT et entrer en contact avec vos clients.
Réclamer ce site
Ce site utilise des cookies à des fins d'analyse et de personnalisation. En continuant, vous acceptez notre politique en matière de cookies.
Accepter