Le site cn.com est-il sûr ?

This website is safe. ADMINUSLabs Clean site AegisLab WebGuard Clean site AlienVault Clean site Antiy-AVL Clean site AutoShun Unrated site Avira Clean site BitDefender Clean site C-SIRT Clean site CLEAN MX Clean site Comodo Site Inspector Clean site CyberCrime Clean site Dr.Web Clean site ESET Clean site See all results: *****

Russian Pill Domains like ***** pilulesenligne.com. and SEO crap on ***** [Querying whois.arin.net] [whois.arin.net] # # Query terms are ambiguous. The query is assumed to be: # "n 64.74.223.44" # # Use "?" to get help. # # # The following results may also be obtained via: # http://whois.arin.net/rest/nets;q=64.74.223.44?showDetails=true&showARIN=false&ext=netref2 # Internap Network Services Corporation PNAP-SEA-BLOCK4 (NET-64-74-0-0-1) ***** - ***** eNom INAP-SJE-ENOM-3077 (NET-64-74-223-0-1) ***** - ***** # # ARIN WHOIS data and services are subject to the Terms of Use # available at: ***** # Host 44.223.74.64.in-addr.arpa. not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)

this site is not a typosquat for ***** at all. it is used as a valid country code alternative for china. and those people who say all websites ending in "cn.com" are spam or phishing or typosquatting websites fundamentally understand nothing about the DNS and their reviews can't be relied upon - this is like saying all websites ending in .net or .info or .org are bad or good just because of your experience with one website! if the people using WOT don't know enough to understand this, then their reviews and opinions really can't be taken seriously. the only thing any site ending in ".cn.com" has in common with any other is that it uses the same domain ending (in the same way millions of sites use .net, .org, .com on its own, etc). absolutely ridiculous. there are lots of individual websites out there that are good and bad - but whether they're good or bad has nothing to do with the fact that they end in ".cn.com" or not! "

Typosquatter for cnn [dot] com. A more popular site that doesn't HOST ROGUE SEARCH ENGINES! In this case, it acts like a search engine when it actually isn't one AT ALL. "Borrowing" Googles search engine is legal (Because Google allows it). Claiming it's yours... not so.